Gamba: Mu oz claims that the Southwest Hopeville Neighbors : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 24 Jan 2017, 02:53

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Gamba: Mu oz claims that the Southwest Hopeville Neighbors

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Sep 2012
Posts: 338
Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Strategy
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V42
GPA: 3.88
WE: Medicine and Health (Health Care)
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 179 [1] , given: 31

Gamba: Mu oz claims that the Southwest Hopeville Neighbors [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Nov 2012, 04:27
1
KUDOS
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (02:34) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 36 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Gamba: Muñoz claims that the Southwest Hopeville Neighbors Association overwhelmingly opposes the new water system, citing this as evidence of citywide opposition. The association did pass a resolution opposing the new water system, but only 25 of 350 members voted, with 10 in favor of the system. Furthermore, the 15 opposing votes represent far less than 1 percent of Hopeville’s population. One should not assume that so few votes represent the view of the majority of Hopeville’s residents.

Of the following, which one most accurately describes
Gamba’s strategy of argumentation?

(A) questioning a conclusion based on the results of
a vote, on the grounds that people with certain
views are more likely to vote

(B) questioning a claim supported by statistical data
by arguing that statistical data can be
manipulated to support whatever view the
interpreter wants to support

(C) attempting to refute an argument by showing
that, contrary to what has been claimed, the
truth of the premises does not guarantee the
truth of the conclusion

(D) criticizing a view on the grounds that the view
is based on evidence that is in principle
impossible to disconfirm

(E) attempting to cast doubt on a conclusion by
claiming that the statistical sample on which
the conclusion is based is too small to be
dependable
_________________

"When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe, then you’ll be successful.” - Eric Thomas

If you have any questions
New!
Intern
Status: Edge of Extinction
Joined: 09 Sep 2012
Posts: 40
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 29

Re: Gamba: Muñoz claims that the Southwest Hopeville.. [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Nov 2012, 09:53
Analysis of Argument
Prephrase: Small sample size does not imply the same finding would hold for a larger sample size

(A) questioning a conclusion based on the results of a vote, on the grounds that people with certain views are more likely to vote Likelihood of voting based on views is out of scope of the argument. Incorrect.

(B) questioning a claim supported by statistical data by arguing that statistical data can be manipulated to support whatever view the interpreter wants to support Manipulation of statistical data is not implied, but rather that the samplesize of the data is not large enough. Shell game choice. Incorrect.

(C) attempting to refute an argument by showing that, contrary to what has been claimed, the truth of the premises does not guarantee the truth of the conclusion The problem is that the scope of the premise is not large enough, rather than the validity of the premise->conclusion logic itself. Interesting choice, nonetheless. Incorrect.

(D) criticizing a view on the grounds that the view is based on evidence that is in principle impossible to disconfirm Impossibility of proving is not part of the argument. Out of scope. Incorrect.

(E) attempting to cast doubt on a conclusion by claiming that the statistical sample on which the conclusion is based is too small to be dependable Matches prephrase. Correct.

Thanks Vomhorizon.
_________________

The only ability the GMAT is an indicator of...is the ability to do well on the GMAT.

VP
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1420
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
Followers: 176

Kudos [?]: 1339 [0], given: 62

Re: Gamba: Muñoz claims that the Southwest Hopeville.. [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Nov 2012, 22:24
vomhorizon wrote:
Gamba: Muñoz claims that the Southwest Hopeville Neighbors Association overwhelmingly opposes the new water system, citing this as evidence of citywide opposition. The association did pass a resolution opposing the new water system, but only 25 of 350 members voted, with 10 in favor of the system. Furthermore, the 15 opposing votes represent far less than 1 percent of Hopeville’s population. One should not assume that so few votes represent the view of the majority of Hopeville’s residents.

Of the following, which one most accurately describes
Gamba’s strategy of argumentation?

(A) questioning a conclusion based on the results of
a vote, on the grounds that people with certain
views are more likely to vote

(B) questioning a claim supported by statistical data
by arguing that statistical data can be
manipulated to support whatever view the
interpreter wants to support

(C) attempting to refute an argument by showing
that, contrary to what has been claimed, the
truth of the premises does not guarantee the
truth of the conclusion

(D) criticizing a view on the grounds that the view
is based on evidence that is in principle
impossible to disconfirm

(E) attempting to cast doubt on a conclusion by
claiming that the statistical sample on which
the conclusion is based is too small to be
dependable

"Munoz claims that X opposes Y, citing this as evidence of citywide opposition." In other words, Munoz tells X is representative of the general population of the town.
He gives the evidence, which is too weak.
Conclusion of the argument is that "one should not assume that so few votes represent the view of the majority of Hopeville’s residents."

Only E agrees with the above logic.
+1 E
_________________
Re: Gamba: Muñoz claims that the Southwest Hopeville..   [#permalink] 28 Nov 2012, 22:24
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Neighboring landholders: Air pollution from the giant 7 05 Aug 2010, 13:16
Neighboring landholders: Air pollution from the giant 2 07 Dec 2009, 13:06
When Alicia Green borrowed a neighbor s car without 16 07 Jun 2009, 08:51
When Alicia Green borrowed a neighbor s car without 9 28 May 2007, 07:44
When Alicia Green borrowed a neighbor s car without 5 28 May 2007, 07:32
Display posts from previous: Sort by