Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Oct 2014, 05:12

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Gambling experts contend that with a sufficiently advanced

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
4 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Keep fighting!
Affiliations: IIT Madras
Joined: 31 Jul 2010
Posts: 238
WE 1: 2+ years - Programming
WE 2: 3+ years - Product developement,
WE 3: 2+ years - Program management
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 182 [4] , given: 104

Gambling experts contend that with a sufficiently advanced [#permalink] New post 02 Oct 2010, 08:05
4
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

56% (02:38) correct 44% (01:36) wrong based on 154 sessions
Gambling experts contend that with a sufficiently advanced computer technology, a skilled technician will soon be able to win almost every time he or she bets on horse racing. Yet such a claim could never be evaluated, for losses would simply be blamed on immature technology or the technician's lack of proficiency.

Which of the following, if true, would be most useful as a basis for arguing against the author's claim that the gambling experts' contention cannot be evaluated?

-Some technicians using advanced computers have been able to gamble successfully more than half the time.
-Gambling experts readily admit that it is not yet possible to produce the necessary computer equipment.
-There is a direct correlation between the sophistication of computer technology available to a programmer and the gambling success he or she achieves with it.
-Certain rare configurations of computer data can serve as a basis for precise gambling predictions.
-Even without computer assistance, skilled gamblers can make a steady living from gambling.

Don't forget KUDOS if you like the question. This is from KAPLAN CAT.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesKnewton GMAT Discount CodesVeritas Prep GMAT Discount Codes
1 KUDOS received
Ms. Big Fat Panda
Ms. Big Fat Panda
User avatar
Status: Three Down.
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1879
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, Organizational Behavior
Followers: 349

Kudos [?]: 1415 [1] , given: 196

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Gambling software [#permalink] New post 02 Oct 2010, 08:17
1
This post received
KUDOS
Gambling experts say:

Provided there's advanced enough technology: Skilled technician will win almost every time.

hemanthp wrote:
Gambling experts contend that with a sufficiently advanced computer technology, a skilled technician will soon be able to win almost every time he or she bets on horse racing. Yet such a claim could never be evaluated, for losses would simply be blamed on immature technology or the technician's lack of proficiency.

Which of the following, if true, would be most useful as a basis for arguing against the author's claim that the gambling experts' contention cannot be evaluated?

-Some technicians using advanced computers have been able to gamble successfully more than half the time. This would support the gambling expert's view point. We are asked to find something that would render the proposition useless
-Gambling experts readily admit that it is not yet possible to produce the necessary computer equipment. This is a tricky one. It might appear right at first glance, but think about it - the gambling expert says "IF you have the tech, you can win almost every time" and this one says, "The tech is not available yet" so this indirectly alludes to a possible scenario that it WOULD be possible if only the tech had been available. Doesn't weaken the expert's argument. Hence incorrect
-There is a direct correlation between the sophistication of computer technology available to a programmer and the gambling success he or she achieves with it. This is correct. So if the computer technology is not as advanced, then even a skilled technician won't be able to bet on the right one every time/win. Directly contradicts his reasoning, hence correct
-Certain rare configurations of computer data can serve as a basis for precise gambling predictions. Supports the argument!
-Even without computer assistance, skilled gamblers can make a steady living from gambling. We don't care about this as it doesn't relate to the proposition at all

Don't forget KUDOS if you like the question. This is from KAPLAN CAT. - I notice that it's already there in your signature, please don't post questions simply for the purpose of attaining kudos. Make your contributions valuable instead and users will automatically feel inclined to give you kudos :)
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Keep fighting!
Affiliations: IIT Madras
Joined: 31 Jul 2010
Posts: 238
WE 1: 2+ years - Programming
WE 2: 3+ years - Product developement,
WE 3: 2+ years - Program management
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 182 [0], given: 104

Re: Gambling software [#permalink] New post 02 Oct 2010, 08:37
Wow PANDA ..you are good at CR. All these are the ones I got wrong.
Ms. Big Fat Panda
Ms. Big Fat Panda
User avatar
Status: Three Down.
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1879
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, Organizational Behavior
Followers: 349

Kudos [?]: 1415 [0], given: 196

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Gambling software [#permalink] New post 02 Oct 2010, 08:43
I think for CR you need to look at the nitty-gritty details. The second choice in this question for instance - that would be mildly tricky and I am hazarding a guess that it's an answer that most people would choose but get wrong.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: ISB, Hyderabad
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 176
WE 1: 4 years Software Product Development
WE 2: 3 years ERP Consulting
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 15

Re: Gambling software [#permalink] New post 02 Oct 2010, 21:44
Missed the against in the question and got the option D. I hate it when I read the question wrong.
_________________

-AD

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 08 Sep 2010
Posts: 236
Location: India
WE 1: 6 Year, Telecom(GSM)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 87 [0], given: 21

Re: Gambling software [#permalink] New post 03 Oct 2010, 00:08
Got it by reading Your Book whiplash.Now only i tried using ur way.Thanks.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Nov 2009
Posts: 90
Schools: Wharton..:)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 14

Re: Gambling software [#permalink] New post 03 Oct 2010, 02:56
conclusion :: such a claim could never be evaluated,
ask urself ? wht is " such a claim"..?
ans- such a claim is tht thr is no technology tht can help u in assessing the correct performance of the gambler BECAUSE evn the losses would be tempered..

so anything tht helps u in assessing the performance of a gambler is ur ans ..

go ahead ans solve ans should be B..:)
_________________

" What [i] do is not beyond anybody else's competence"- warren buffett
My Gmat experience -http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-710-q-47-v-41-tips-for-non-natives-107086.html

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 17
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [1] , given: 8

Re: Gambling software [#permalink] New post 04 Nov 2010, 04:14
1
This post received
KUDOS
Option C is correct.
In my opinion, C tells us that there is a logical link between the technology available and the success rate achievable. Thus, at least in future, such evaluation could be possible when such advanced technology is available.

HTH
--
Aman
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1726
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 67

Kudos [?]: 330 [0], given: 109

Re: Gambling software [#permalink] New post 04 Nov 2010, 18:52
+1 C 8-)
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Aug 2010
Posts: 66
Schools: UNC Kenan-Flagler, IU Kelley, Emory GSB
WE 1: 5 yrs
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 50

Re: Gambling software [#permalink] New post 09 Nov 2010, 02:27
hemanthp wrote:
Gambling experts contend that with a sufficiently advanced computer technology, a skilled technician will soon be able to win almost every time he or she bets on horse racing. Yet such a claim could never be evaluated, for losses would simply be blamed on immature technology or the technician's lack of proficiency.

Which of the following, if true, would be most useful as a basis for arguing against the author's claim that the gambling experts' contention cannot be evaluated?

-Some technicians using advanced computers have been able to gamble successfully more than half the time.
-Gambling experts readily admit that it is not yet possible to produce the necessary computer equipment.
-There is a direct correlation between the sophistication of computer technology available to a programmer and the gambling success he or she achieves with it.
-Certain rare configurations of computer data can serve as a basis for precise gambling predictions.
-Even without computer assistance, skilled gamblers can make a steady living from gambling.

Don't forget KUDOS if you like the question. This is from KAPLAN CAT.


Hi Whiplash... I don't think I understood your explanation of the correct answer.

I get really lost it in such timekiller CRs :(. Though I got it correct, my reasoning isn't in line with the others.

My take on this is:
We have to prove that author is wrong - i.e. gambling experts' claim can be evaluated. i.e. there is no scope of blame game when there is a loss. i.e. the output is measurable.

C states that there is a direct correlation between technology and the level of success achieved by a technician. Hence, proficiency can be measured. This is sufficient to prove the author wrong.

Thats why i thought its the correct answer. Am i missing something??
_________________

The night is at its darkest just before the dawn... never, ever give up!


Last edited by yossarian84 on 09 Nov 2010, 07:38, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Posts: 59
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: Gambling software [#permalink] New post 09 Nov 2010, 07:31
argmnt :

advcd tech -> gmblr wins gamblng
But this can not be evaluted
If relation b\w 2 items establishes then this activity can be evaluated

ans = C that establishes relation b\w 2 items so one can be evaluated wrt to other
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1691
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 299 [0], given: 36

Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Gambling software [#permalink] New post 27 Mar 2011, 06:47
The answer is C, it provides evidence against speaker's claim.
_________________

Formula of Life -> Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant)

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2010
Posts: 121
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 6

Re: Gambling software [#permalink] New post 27 Mar 2011, 18:10
Answer is C...
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Apr 2010
Posts: 165
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 31

Re: Gambling software [#permalink] New post 27 Mar 2011, 18:51
B is not the answer because - we don't have gambling experts opinion if the equipment will be produced later on.
C is the answer.
_________________

Consider me giving KUDOS, if you find my post helpful.
If at first you don't succeed, you're running about average. ~Anonymous

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 31
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: Gambling software [#permalink] New post 27 Mar 2011, 23:05
what does the last sentence of the argument mean:
Yet such a claim could never be evaluated, for losses would simply be blamed on immature technology or the technician's lack of proficiency.

cant get how the clause after 'for' is related to 'Yet such a claim could never be evaluated'

plz help
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2010
Posts: 220
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 680 Q44 V39
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 5

Re: Gambling software [#permalink] New post 28 Mar 2011, 01:54
I remember getting this one correct on the test. Answer is C as mentioned by many.
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Matriculating
Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 929
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 200 [0], given: 123

Reviews Badge
Re: Gambling software [#permalink] New post 28 Mar 2011, 18:00
Nobody is telling about D. I read this post and no explanation.

Posted from my mobile device Image
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Jun 2012
Posts: 150
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 37

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Gambling experts contend that with a sufficiently advanced [#permalink] New post 04 Oct 2013, 06:56
Premise:
With advanced computer technology = success for skilled T
Author Disagrees, as losses can be bcoz immature technology or the technician's lack of proficiency.
How can this be untrue? If there is a known correlation between technology & success

C. There is a direct correlation between the sophistication of computer technology available to a programmer and the gambling success he or she achieves with it. ---> Talks about correlation. If you know x advance = x success. you cant blame technology.
D. Certain rare configurations of computer data can serve as a basis for precise gambling predictions. --> Only Certain rare configurations of computer data = success Not necessary computer technology or skill
_________________

Please give Kudos if you like the post

Re: Gambling experts contend that with a sufficiently advanced   [#permalink] 04 Oct 2013, 06:56
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
The owners of gambling casinos are keen to attract divineacclivity 3 03 Nov 2012, 00:59
1 Due to significant advances in biotechnology, experts agdimple333 6 13 Jun 2011, 10:23
1 expert in sondenso 6 26 Apr 2008, 01:33
Futuristic's gambling laboratory has decided that 6-sided Futuristic 15 09 Sep 2006, 15:44
1 Gambling experts contend that with a sufficiently advanced mrmikec 18 11 Jun 2006, 21:28
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Gambling experts contend that with a sufficiently advanced

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.