Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 30 Aug 2014, 08:44

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Garbage dumps do not harm wildlife. Evidence is furnished by

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 332
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Garbage dumps do not harm wildlife. Evidence is furnished by [#permalink] New post 10 Jul 2004, 03:31
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (01:34) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions
Garbage dumps do not harm wildlife. Evidence is furnished by the Masal-Mara reserve in Kenya, where baboons that use the garbage dumps on the reserve as a food source mature faster and have more offspring than do baboons on the reserve that do not scavenge on garbage. Each of the following statements, if true, casts doubt on the argument EXCEPT:

A) The baboons that feed on the garbage dump are of a different species from those that do not.

B) The life expectancy of baboons that eat garbage is significantly lower than that of baboons that do not eat garbage.

C) The cholesterol level of garbage-eating baboons is dangerously higher than that of baboons that do not eat garbage.

D) The population of hyenas that live near unregulated garbage landfills north of the reserve has doubled in the last two years.

E) The rate of birth defects for the baboon population on the reserve has doubled since the first landfills were opened.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 04 Jul 2004
Posts: 905
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Jul 2004, 04:19
IMO.. (D)

(live near unregulated garbage landfills north of the reserve..)
No mention of eating or some defect.

(B) (C) (E) are out, since they find some problem with garbage dumps.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 854
Location: Hyderabad
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Jul 2004, 06:47
D should be it!
All the other options are atleast related to the argument - D is totally way off!

Time Taken: 45s
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 159 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Jul 2004, 08:29
I would go with A. It was b/w A and D. (1m30)
D) If more hyenas are around garbage dumps, then it will make those areas dangerous to babboons who will not mature faster and have more offspring than do baboons on the reserve because they will be killed by hyenas. This does cast doubt on the argument
A) Even though the babboons are of another specie, they are still babboons and it does support the argument that those babboons who live near garbage dumps could mature faster
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Jun 2003
Posts: 151
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Jul 2004, 08:43
Agree..D is out of scope.

:rotate
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 971
Location: Florida
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Jul 2004, 10:54
Paul wrote:
I would go with A. It was b/w A and D. (1m30)
D) If more hyenas are around garbage dumps, then it will make those areas dangerous to babboons who will not mature faster and have more offspring than do baboons on the reserve because they will be killed by hyenas. This does cast doubt on the argument
A) Even though the babboons are of another specie, they are still babboons and it does support the argument that those babboons who live near garbage dumps could mature faster


Paul, your critique against D is valid and provoking, but I still go for D.

The evidence is based on baboons' feeding on garbage, their growth and other baboons who don't feed on garbage. This lead to a comparison between the same baboon species, ones who feed on garbage and ones who don't. But, if we say the later ones are of some other species, then the argument falls apart.

D says hyenas are nurturing..ah! so do baboons +ve.

anyway, hyenas hunt on grounds and baboons stay on trees :twisted: ah! hyenas can kill baboons when they come to feed on garbage ... man! this is garbage.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 159 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Jul 2004, 11:26
guys, the argument says: Garbage dumps do not harm wildlife
The question is: which answer does not cast doubt on that argument
A) How can the fact that the babboons are of a different specie hurt the argument? Should they be of one or the other specie, those different babboons are still part of wildlife. Hence, A does not cast doubt in the argument
Anybody else's view on this? Carsen, Oleg, ob, Bhai?
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 25 Dec 2003
Posts: 360
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Jul 2004, 11:46
Pardon me for the late entry ....(been busy with my son). Let us look at the argument.

Author says that the garbage assists the baboons and not harm them. And also gives evidence. What we shud look for is something that supports this. (Beware with the word EXCEPT), all but the one we choose shud contribute to the author.

A) The baboons that feed on the garbage dump are of a different species from those that do not. - NOT RELEVANT.

B) The life expectancy of baboons that eat garbage is significantly lower than that of baboons that do not eat garbage. - AGAINST THE AUTHOR.

C) The cholesterol level of garbage-eating baboons is dangerously higher than that of baboons that do not eat garbage. - AGAINST THE AUTHOR.

D) The population of hyenas that live near unregulated garbage landfills north of the reserve has doubled in the last two years. - GOOD ONE IN HERE. Hence D is the answer, that contributes to the authors statement. It also provides more evidence on the author's claim, that the Hyena (mammal) population has increased. D is the best.

E) The rate of birth defects for the baboon population on the reserve has doubled since the first landfills were opened. - AGAINST THE AUTHOR


I hope this helped.
_________________

Giving another SHOT

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 159 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Jul 2004, 12:05
Thanks Carsen. So if hyenas are part of wildlife, they would serve as an example that garbage dumps do help the growth of wildlife. I, for my part, saw hyenas as predators who would not help the growth of babboons but yes, hyenas and babboons are part of the same category: wildlife animals. I made an unwarranted assumption about hyenas killing babboons. D more directly refutes the claim and should be it then. :stupid2
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 25 May 2004
Posts: 282
Location: Ukraine
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Jul 2004, 12:50
Hi Paul,

I haven't posted in quite a while.

We are asked to strengthen the argument which states that garbage dumps do not harm wildlife.

A casts doubt on the argument since the scavengers of a different species may be genetically better equipped to mature faster and reproduce better, regardless of whether or not they feed on the garbage dumps.

B weakens the argument because if an organism’s life expectancy is low, it matures faster and is forced to produce more offspring to ensure the continuation of the species.

C shows that dumps are not that salutary.

D Bingo! It does tell us that dumps are beneficial (however odd that may sound).

E sends a strong message that dumps hurt wildlife.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 332
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Jul 2004, 20:46
OA is D.
  [#permalink] 10 Jul 2004, 20:46
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic Although John never means to do harm or hurt Jane, he goodyear2013 9 03 Jul 2014, 11:46
1 That pollution harms the environment is self-evident; that swatirpr 16 26 Nov 2009, 12:33
That pollution harms the environment is self-evident; that prude_sb 1 11 Feb 2007, 08:44
That pollution harms the environment is self-evident; that jjhko 6 30 Aug 2006, 20:06
Household garbage sonaketu 8 20 Mar 2005, 02:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Garbage dumps do not harm wildlife. Evidence is furnished by

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.