Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
:D I gave my GMAT today. I got 520 ( Q - 44, Verbal - 19). Well my overall experience was good. I got low score in verbal as I had to guess half of the questions due to lack of time. I got 2-3 lengthy RC which took all my time. I guess, I did not plan the strategy. The Quant was easy. In fact, I ran out of time in this section too and had to guess 3-5 questions. Otherwise, I could get more. Considering the fact that I just studied for a month and out of that I studied seriously only in the last two weeks(over the weekends), I think it is not a bad score. I felt Quant was similar to Powerprep.
Can you tell me about the AWA section. Were the topics difficult ? or similar to the ones on the Official Guide. How would you compare the RC and other questions on Verbal with the questions on the POWERPREP/ETS official guide.
I am taking the exam in less than a week. Any reply will be helpful.
I cannot compare GMAT with OG as I never studied OG. But I think, PP is a close representation of your actual score. I got 540 on PP1 and 570 on PP2. I gave both within a week's time and also gave them without studying OG. So, I really don't know if PP will be an approximate representation of your GMAt score if you have given PP after studying OG. Verbal had SC, which were pretty long. 2-3 short sentences and rest were long. RC was not as boring as I had thought. They were interesting paragraphs and hence easy to answer. But, they were all long and hence I had to spend lot of time on them.
Check out this awesome article about Anderson on Poets Quants, http://poetsandquants.com/2015/01/02/uclas-anderson-school-morphs-into-a-friendly-tech-hub/ . Anderson is a great place! Sorry for the lack of updates recently. I...