Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 04 May 2015, 00:35

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Given a series of n consecutive positive integers, where n >

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
2 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Finally Done. Admitted in Kellogg for 2015 intake
Joined: 25 Jun 2011
Posts: 563
Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: International Business, Strategy
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
GPA: 2.9
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 995 [2] , given: 217

Given a series of n consecutive positive integers, where n > [#permalink] New post 12 Jan 2012, 22:35
2
This post received
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  85% (hard)

Question Stats:

48% (02:42) correct 52% (01:45) wrong based on 147 sessions
Given a series of n consecutive positive integers, where n > 1, is the average value of this series an integer divisible by 3?

(1) n is odd
(2) The sum of the first number of the series and (n – 1) / 2 is an integer divisible by 3

For me the answer is D. can someone please let me know if you think its not correct? Unfortunately, I don't have an OA. This is how I solved it. Also, please let me know if there is any shortcut or any concept that you guys can see straight after reading the questions.

Statement 1 --> n is ODD. When there are ODD terms in the consecutive series the average will be an integer that will never be divisible by 3. Hence NO and therefore this statement is sufficient.

Statement 2 --> Let's say n=7 and 1st term = 3. So 3+(7-1/2) = 6. 6+3 = 9 which is divisible by 3. Average value will be 6 which is divisible by 3.

Lets say n = 13. Average value will be 9 which is divisible by 3. Therefore this statement is also sufficient to answer the question.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Best Regards,
E.

MGMAT 1 --> 530
MGMAT 2--> 640
MGMAT 3 ---> 610
GMAT ==> 730

Director
Director
User avatar
Status:
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Posts: 570
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V48
GRE 1: 1540 Q800 V740
Followers: 74

Kudos [?]: 321 [0], given: 11

Re: Series of n consecutive positive integers [#permalink] New post 13 Jan 2012, 03:19
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
The sum of n terms of a consecutive positive integer series = (n/2)[2a + n -1] where a is the first term

Average of the first n terms = (1/2) [2a+ n -1] = a + [(n-1)/2]

Using statement (1), if n is odd then the answer may or may not be divisible by 3. For example, take a=1 and n=5 to get average of first n terms as 3, which is divisible by 3. However, if a=1 and n=3 then the average of the first n terms is 2, which is not divisible by 3. Insufficient.

Using statement (2), a + [(n-1)/2] is divisible by 3. This means that a + [(n-1)/2] is divisible by 3. Therefore the average is divisible by 3. Sufficient.

Therefore the answer is (B).
_________________

GyanOne | http://www.GyanOne.com | +91 9899831738

Get a free detailed MBA profile evaluation

Top MBA Rankings and MBA Admissions blog


Image

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 581
Location: United States
Concentration: International Business, General Management
GPA: 3.86
WE: Accounting (Commercial Banking)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 85 [0], given: 16

Re: Series of n consecutive positive integers [#permalink] New post 13 Jan 2012, 03:45
GyanOne wrote:
The sum of n terms of a consecutive positive integer series = (n/2)[2a + n -1] where a is the first term

Average of the first n terms = (1/2) [2a+ n -1] = a + [(n-1)/2]

Using statement (1), if n is odd then the answer may or may not be divisible by 3. For example, take a=1 and n=5 to get average of first n terms as 3, which is divisible by 3. However, if a=1 and n=3 then the average of the first n terms is 2, which is not divisible by 3. Insufficient.

Using statement (2), a + [(n-1)/2] is divisible by 3. This means that a + [(n-1)/2] is divisible by 3. Therefore the average is divisible by 3. Sufficient.

Therefore the answer is (B).


Here how did you take n=1, in the question he said n>1 right?...can you please explain??
_________________

+1 Kudos If found helpful..

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 22 Aug 2011
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

Re: Series of n consecutive positive integers [#permalink] New post 13 Jan 2012, 22:40
For Statement II:

lets assume n=11 and the consecutive positive integer series be 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11

then 1+(11-1)/2 = 6 which is divisible by 3 and the average of (1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10+11) =33 which is divisible by 3
however, if we assume n=3 and take the consecutive positive integer series to be 2,3,4
the 2+(3-1)/2= 3 which is divisible by 3 but the average of (2+3+4) is not divisible by 3


I'm not sure if what im doing is right ;@
Expert Post
2 KUDOS received
Math Expert
User avatar
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 27170
Followers: 4226

Kudos [?]: 40968 [2] , given: 5576

Re: Series of n consecutive positive integers [#permalink] New post 16 Jan 2012, 17:05
2
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
enigma123 wrote:
Given a series of n consecutive positive integers, where n > 1, is the average value of this series an integer divisible by 3?
(1) n is odd
(2) The sum of the first number of the series and (n – 1) / 2 is an integer divisible by 3

For me the answer is D. can someone please let me know if you think its not correct? Unfortunately, I don't have an OA. This is how I solved it. Also, please let me know if there is any shortcut or any concept that you guys can see straight after reading the questions.

Statement 1 --> n is ODD. When there are ODD terms in the consecutive series the average will be an integer that will never be divisible by 3. Hence NO and therefore this statement is sufficient.

Statement 2 --> Let's say n=7 and 1st term = 3. So 3+(7-1/2) = 6. 6+3 = 9 which is divisible by 3. Average value will be 6 which is divisible by 3.

Lets say n = 13. Average value will be 9 which is divisible by 3. Therefore this statement is also sufficient to answer the question.


Responding to a pm.

Couple of things:
In any evenly spaced set (AP) the arithmetic mean (average) is equal to the median and can be calculated by the formula: (first term+last term)/2

Now, set of consecutive integers is an evenly spaced set (AP with common difference of 1) and in order mean=median to be an integer it has to have an odd number of terms. If there are an even number of terms mean=median will be integer/2.

For example:
{1, 2, 3} --> mean=median (middle term)=(3+1)/2=2;
{1, 2, 3, 4} --> mean=median=(1+4)/2=5/2=2.5.

Next, in AP if the first term is \(a\) and the common difference of successive members is \(d\), then the \(n_{th}\) term of the sequence is given by: \(a_ n=a+d(n-1)\). In case of consecutive integers (so when common difference=d=1) the formula becomes: \(a_ n=a+n-1\).

Check Number Theory for more on AP: math-number-theory-88376.html (specifically "Consecutive Integers" and "Evenly Spaced Set" chapters of it)

BACK TO THE ORIGINAL QUESTION.
Given a series of n consecutive positive integers, where n > 1, is the average value of this series an integer divisible by 3?

Basically we are asked whether: \(average=\frac{first \ term+last \ term}{2}\) is divisible by 3 or whether \(average=\frac{a+(a+n-1)}{2}=a+\frac{n-1}{2}\) is divisible by 3 (where \(a\) is the first term and \((a+n-1)\) is the \(n_{th}\), so last term).

(1) n is odd --> as n=odd then the average is definitely an integer, though it may or may not be divisible by 3: {2, 3, 4} - YES, {1, 2, 3} - NO. Not sufficient.

(2) The sum of the first number of the series and (n – 1) / 2 is an integer divisible by 3 --> we are directly given that \(a+\frac{n-1}{2}\) is divisible by 3. Sufficient.

Answer: B.

Important note: you should have spotted that there was something wrong with your solution as on the GMAT, two data sufficiency statements always provide TRUE information and these statements never contradict each other.

So we can not have answer NO from statement (1) and answer YES from statement (2) (as you got in your solution), because in this case statements would contradict each other.

Hope it helps.
_________________

NEW TO MATH FORUM? PLEASE READ THIS: ALL YOU NEED FOR QUANT!!!

PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 11 Rules for Posting!!!

RESOURCES: [GMAT MATH BOOK]; 1. Triangles; 2. Polygons; 3. Coordinate Geometry; 4. Factorials; 5. Circles; 6. Number Theory; 7. Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets; 9. PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders; 11. GMAT Prep Software Analysis NEW!!!; 12. SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS) NEW!!!; 12. Tricky questions from previous years. NEW!!!;

COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat

DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS ; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.


What are GMAT Club Tests?
25 extra-hard Quant Tests

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Director
Director
avatar
Status: Finally Done. Admitted in Kellogg for 2015 intake
Joined: 25 Jun 2011
Posts: 563
Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: International Business, Strategy
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
GPA: 2.9
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 995 [0], given: 217

Re: Series of n consecutive positive integers [#permalink] New post 19 Jan 2012, 15:54
You are a star Bunuel. Thanks for such a detailed explanation.
_________________

Best Regards,
E.

MGMAT 1 --> 530
MGMAT 2--> 640
MGMAT 3 ---> 610
GMAT ==> 730

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 4766
Followers: 295

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Given a series of n consecutive positive integers, where n > [#permalink] New post 24 Oct 2014, 07:58
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

GMAT Books | GMAT Club Tests | Best Prices on GMAT Courses | GMAT Mobile App | Math Resources | Verbal Resources

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 Jan 2014
Posts: 115
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 94

Re: Given a series of n consecutive positive integers, where n > [#permalink] New post 25 Oct 2014, 00:34
enigma123 wrote:
Given a series of n consecutive positive integers, where n > 1, is the average value of this series an integer divisible by 3?

(1) n is odd
(2) The sum of the first number of the series and (n – 1) / 2 is an integer divisible by 3

For me the answer is D. can someone please let me know if you think its not correct? Unfortunately, I don't have an OA. This is how I solved it. Also, please let me know if there is any shortcut or any concept that you guys can see straight after reading the questions.

Statement 1 --> n is ODD. When there are ODD terms in the consecutive series the average will be an integer that will never be divisible by 3. Hence NO and therefore this statement is sufficient.

Statement 2 --> Let's say n=7 and 1st term = 3. So 3+(7-1/2) = 6. 6+3 = 9 which is divisible by 3. Average value will be 6 which is divisible by 3.

Lets say n = 13. Average value will be 9 which is divisible by 3. Therefore this statement is also sufficient to answer the question.


B.

(1) n is odd
1,2,3 ; Ans = No.
2,3,4 ; Ans = Yes.
So insufficient.

(2) The sum of the first number of the series and (n – 1) / 2 is an integer divisible by 3
Let the series be a,a+1,a+2,...,a+(n-1)
acc to FS2 [a + (n-1)/2] mod 3 = 0
the avg of series is: na + ((n-1)(n)/2) = [n (a + (n-1)/2)]
since [a + (n-1)/2] mod 3 = 0
=> n*[a + (n-1)/2] is also div by 3.
hence, the avg is div by 3.
sufficient.
_________________

Illegitimi non carborundum.

Re: Given a series of n consecutive positive integers, where n >   [#permalink] 25 Oct 2014, 00:34
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Experts publish their posts in the topic Given that m and n are integers, is m > n ? pran21 1 03 Sep 2014, 10:09
4 Experts publish their posts in the topic If the sum of n consecutive integers is 1, where n > 1 danzig 3 24 Oct 2012, 13:18
1 Is the sum of a series of n consecutive integers even? I) n Skewed 7 18 Jan 2008, 09:10
If m and n are positive integers, are m and n consecutive acid_burn 8 15 Sep 2005, 09:45
Given a series n_k = ((-1)^k)*k, such that k is a positive sparky 4 27 May 2005, 19:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Given a series of n consecutive positive integers, where n >

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.