Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 07:32 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 07:32

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Affiliations: SPG
Posts: 232
Own Kudos [?]: 3137 [45]
Given Kudos: 34
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92914
Own Kudos [?]: 618951 [11]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 04 Feb 2010
Posts: 45
Own Kudos [?]: 44 [6]
Given Kudos: 0
Schools:IESE '13
 Q50  V42
GPA: 3.07
WE 1: Engineer
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Jun 2009
Posts: 132
Own Kudos [?]: 333 [2]
Given Kudos: 6
 Q49  V22 GMAT 2: 700  Q50  V35
Send PM
Re: is n — 1 divisible by 3? [#permalink]
2
Kudos
dimitri92 wrote:
Given that n is an integer, is n — 1 divisible by 3?
(1) n^2 + n is not divisible by 3
(2) 3n +5 >= k+8 , where k is a positive multiple of 3


A,

St1 \(n^2 + n = n* (n +1)\) is not divisible by 3

which means neither n nor n+1 is divisble by 3 hence n-1 will be divisble by 3

St2 - 3n +5 >= k +8 = > 3n >= K

Now n can be a divisble by 3 or not

for .e g take n = 3 and k = 2 then n is divisble by 3 but if n =4 and k = 2 then n is not.

OA please?
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Status:<strong>Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.</strong>
Posts: 2279
Own Kudos [?]: 3594 [2]
Given Kudos: 235
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Schools: ISB '15 (M)
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Send PM
Re: is n — 1 divisible by 3? [#permalink]
1
Kudos
dimitri92 wrote:
Given that n is an integer, is n — 1 divisible by 3?
(1) n^2 + n is not divisible by 3
(2) 3n +5 >= k+8 , where k is a positive multiple of 3


IMO C.

n^2+n = n(n+1) is not divisible by 3 => n-1 is divisible by 3 IF N is no equal to 0,1,-1 else this wont hold true, thus not sufficient.


3n +5 >= k+8
=> 3n >= k+3 , take k = 3m as k is positive multiple of 3

=> 3n>=3m+3
=> n >= m+1 => n>1 Not sufficient.

But if we combine the both then n-1 is divisible by 3 when n>1
Thus C
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Jun 2009
Posts: 132
Own Kudos [?]: 333 [2]
Given Kudos: 6
 Q49  V22 GMAT 2: 700  Q50  V35
Send PM
Re: is n — 1 divisible by 3? [#permalink]
2
Kudos
gurpreetsingh wrote:
dimitri92 wrote:
Given that n is an integer, is n — 1 divisible by 3?
(1) n^2 + n is not divisible by 3
(2) 3n +5 >= k+8 , where k is a positive multiple of 3


IMO C.

n^2+n = n(n+1) is not divisible by 3 => n-1 is divisible by 3 IF N is no equal to 0,1,-1 else this wont hold true, thus not sufficient.


3n +5 >= k+8
=> 3n >= k+3 , take k = 3m as k is positive multiple of 3

=> 3n>=3m+3
=> n >= m+1 => n>1 Not sufficient.

But if we combine the both then n-1 is divisible by 3 when n>1
Thus C


n^2+n = n(n+1) is not divisible by 3 => n-1 is divisible by 3 IF N is no equal to 0,1,-1 else this wont hold true, thus not sufficient.


I guess you overlooked some facts,

Let me try to explain them with examples,

Say, n=0 then n(n+1) = 0 -> which is divisble by 3 and hence the st 1 is not valid for this example
Now let n=1 then n(n+1) - > 2 which is not diviable by 3 but then n-1 = 0 which is divisble by 3
Now let n=-1 then n(n+1) = 0 which is again divisble y 3 and hence St 1 does not hold true for this example as well.

Cheers,
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 May 2010
Posts: 102
Own Kudos [?]: 115 [0]
Given Kudos: 39
Send PM
Re: is n — 1 divisible by 3? [#permalink]
I completely understand how statement 1 is sufficient, but am going to have to review statement 2 further to understand why it is not sufficient. I understand the simple math just not the explanation that follows.

Good question though. Had me thinking. Thank you very much.
User avatar
Kaplan GMAT Instructor
Joined: 21 Jun 2010
Posts: 55
Own Kudos [?]: 452 [2]
Given Kudos: 2
Location: Toronto
Send PM
Re: Good one [#permalink]
2
Kudos
(1) states that n^2 + n is not divisible by 3.

Or, n*(n+1) is not divisible by 3.

Thus, neither "n" nor "n+1" is a multiple of 3.

Since every 3rd integer on the number line is a multiple of 3, this means that "n+2" is a multiple of 3. And, again, since every 3rd number is a mutiple of 3, (n+2)-3 or "n-1" is a multiple of 3.
Sufficient.

(2) is an inequality. Even if it said:

n-1>= a multiple of 3 (or n-1>= non-multiple of 3)

it would still be insufficient because you can be greater than a multiple of 3 (or a non-multiple of 3) with or without being a multiple of 3 yourself.
Insufficient.

Choose A.
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 356
Own Kudos [?]: 566 [0]
Given Kudos: 13
Send PM
Re: is n — 1 divisible by 3? [#permalink]
its MGMAT

The OE for statement 1.

Since we are told in Statement (1) that the product n^2+n is not divisible by 3, we know that neither n nor n +
1 is divisible by 3. Therefore it seems that n — 1 must be divisible by 3.
However, this only holds if the integers in the consecutive set are nonzero integers. Since Statement (1) does
not tell us this, it is not sufficient.

I dont buy this ...
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 08 Jan 2009
Posts: 245
Own Kudos [?]: 441 [1]
Given Kudos: 7
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V46
Send PM
Re: is n — 1 divisible by 3? [#permalink]
1
Kudos
sudhir18n wrote:
its MGMAT

The OE for statement 1.

Since we are told in Statement (1) that the product n^2+n is not divisible by 3, we know that neither n nor n +
1 is divisible by 3. Therefore it seems that n — 1 must be divisible by 3.
However, this only holds if the integers in the consecutive set are nonzero integers. Since Statement (1) does
not tell us this, it is not sufficient.

I dont buy this ...


Neither.

Here is my logic:

We know this from the question stem:
n = Set of all integers = {..., -6, -5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... }

1) n^2 + n is not divisible by 3

We now know:
n = {... -11, -8, -5, -2, 1, 4, 7, 10, ...} <--- very clear pattern here

We are interested in n-1 (but only from the above set, which meet our condition imposed on 1)
n - 1 = {..., -12, -9, -6, -3, 0, 3, 6, 9, ... }

Let's check these against what ware testing for, are these divisible by three? Very clearly, yes.

1 is sufficient.
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 1114
Own Kudos [?]: 4702 [0]
Given Kudos: 376
Send PM
Re: is n — 1 divisible by 3? [#permalink]
sudhir18n wrote:
its MGMAT

The OE for statement 1.

Since we are told in Statement (1) that the product n^2+n is not divisible by 3, we know that neither n nor n +
1 is divisible by 3. Therefore it seems that n — 1 must be divisible by 3.
However, this only holds if the integers in the consecutive set are nonzero integers. Since Statement (1) does
not tell us this, it is not sufficient.
I dont buy this ...


Thanks Sudhir. Please notify MGMAT. Product of three consecutive integers must be divisible by 3 irrespective of 0, -ves or +ves.

(n-1)n(n+1) must be divisible by 3.
n(n+1): Not Divisible
(n-1): must be divisible
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 23 Oct 2010
Posts: 235
Own Kudos [?]: 1111 [0]
Given Kudos: 73
Location: Azerbaijan
Concentration: Finance
Schools: HEC '15 (A)
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V38
Send PM
Re: Given that n is an integer, is n 1 divisible by 3? (1) n^2 + [#permalink]
Can experts say the final word regarding option (1)? I wonder whether A is sufficient
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 Jan 2013
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 27
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
GPA: 3
WE:Marketing (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Re: Given that n is an integer, is n 1 divisible by 3? (1) n^2 + [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
LalaB wrote:
Can experts say the final word regarding option (1)? I wonder whether A is sufficient


Given that n is an integer, is n — 1 divisible by 3?

(1) n^2 + n is not divisible by 3 --> n(n+1) is not divisible by 3 --> neither n nor n+1 is divisible by 3. Now, n-1, n and n+1 are three consecutive integers, thus one of them must be divisible by 3, so if n and n+1 are NOT, then n-1 must be. Sufficient.

(2) 3n +5 >= k+8 , where k is a positive multiple of 3. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hope it's clear.


Can you kindly explain why B is not sufficient...
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92914
Own Kudos [?]: 618951 [3]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Re: Given that n is an integer, is n 1 divisible by 3? (1) n^2 + [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
karjan07 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
LalaB wrote:
Can experts say the final word regarding option (1)? I wonder whether A is sufficient


Given that n is an integer, is n — 1 divisible by 3?

(1) n^2 + n is not divisible by 3 --> n(n+1) is not divisible by 3 --> neither n nor n+1 is divisible by 3. Now, n-1, n and n+1 are three consecutive integers, thus one of them must be divisible by 3, so if n and n+1 are NOT, then n-1 must be. Sufficient.

(2) 3n +5 >= k+8 , where k is a positive multiple of 3. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hope it's clear.


Can you kindly explain why B is not sufficient...


Sure.

(2) says that 3n +5 >= k+8 , where k is a positive multiple of 3 --> k=3x, for some positive integer x --> \(3n +5\geq{3x+8}\) --> \(3n-3\geq{3x}\) --> \(n-1\geq{x}\). So, basically we just have that n-1 is greater or equal to some positive integer x, thus it may or may not be a multiple of 3.

Hope it's clear.
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Feb 2013
Posts: 35
Own Kudos [?]: 206 [0]
Given Kudos: 35
Send PM
Re: Given that n is an integer, is n 1 divisible by 3? (1) n^2 + [#permalink]
Quote:
(2) says that 3n +5 >= k+8 , where k is a positive multiple of 3 --> k=3x, for some positive integer x --> \(3n +5\geq{3x+8}\) --> \(3n-3\geq{3x}\) --> \(n-1\geq{x}\). So, basically we just have that n-1 is greater or equal to some positive integer x, thus it may or may not be a multiple of 3.


Just to go a bit further on this, in what case would \(n-1\) be divisible by \(3\)? Say if you ended up with \(n-1\geq{3x}\) it would still be insufficient, is not it so? The fact that we have \(\geq\) seems to necessarily mean that \(n-1\) may not necessarily be divisible because we have so many options, or I am missing the point here?
User avatar
VP
VP
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1345
Own Kudos [?]: 2391 [0]
Given Kudos: 355
Concentration: Finance
Send PM
Re: Given that n is an integer, is n 1 divisible by 3? [#permalink]
dimitri92 wrote:
Given that n is an integer, is n — 1 divisible by 3?

(1) n^2 + n is not divisible by 3
(2) 3n +5 >= k+8 , where k is a positive multiple of 3


The product of three consecutive integers (n-1)(n)(n+1) must be divisible by 2

Statement 1

If n^2+n= n(n+1) is not divisible by three then (n-1) must be divisible by 3

Suff

Statement 2

If k is a multiple of three
Then we get that 3n >= k + 3
This only tell us that n >=1 but nothing else. Could be any number

Hence, answer is A

Hope it helps
Cheers!
J :)

That means that n
Intern
Intern
Joined: 22 Jun 2017
Posts: 13
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
Location: India
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V34
GPA: 4
Send PM
Re: Given that n is an integer, is n 1 divisible by 3? [#permalink]
n can not be 0 as o is multiple of every number and not and factor of ant number. OA seems wrong it should be A
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92914
Own Kudos [?]: 618951 [0]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Re: Given that n is an integer, is n 1 divisible by 3? [#permalink]
Expert Reply
amitpassionate wrote:
n can not be 0 as o is multiple of every number and not and factor of ant number. OA seems wrong it should be A


The OA is correct.

For (1) n cannot be 0, because in this case n^2 + n = 0, which IS divisible by 3, so it would contradict this statement. But how this changes the answer? Please re-read the solutions above.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 32674
Own Kudos [?]: 821 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Given that n is an integer, is n 1 divisible by 3? [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Given that n is an integer, is n 1 divisible by 3? [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92914 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne