Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Given that n is an integer, is n — 1 divisible by 3? (1) n^2 + n is not divisible by 3 (2) 3n +5 >= k+8 , where k is a positive multiple of 3

IMO C.

n^2+n = n(n+1) is not divisible by 3 => n-1 is divisible by 3 IF N is no equal to 0,1,-1 else this wont hold true, thus not sufficient.

3n +5 >= k+8 => 3n >= k+3 , take k = 3m as k is positive multiple of 3

=> 3n>=3m+3 => n >= m+1 => n>1 Not sufficient.

But if we combine the both then n-1 is divisible by 3 when n>1 Thus C

n^2+n = n(n+1) is not divisible by 3 => n-1 is divisible by 3 IF N is no equal to 0,1,-1 else this wont hold true, thus not sufficient.

I guess you overlooked some facts,

Let me try to explain them with examples,

Say, n=0 then n(n+1) = 0 -> which is divisble by 3 and hence the st 1 is not valid for this example Now let n=1 then n(n+1) - > 2 which is not diviable by 3 but then n-1 = 0 which is divisble by 3 Now let n=-1 then n(n+1) = 0 which is again divisble y 3 and hence St 1 does not hold true for this example as well.

Given that n is an integer, is n — 1 divisible by 3? (1) n^2 + n is not divisible by 3 (2) 3n +5 >= k+8 , where k is a positive multiple of 3

IMO C.

n^2+n = n(n+1) is not divisible by 3 => n-1 is divisible by 3 IF N is no equal to 0,1,-1 else this wont hold true, thus not sufficient.

3n +5 >= k+8 => 3n >= k+3 , take k = 3m as k is positive multiple of 3

=> 3n>=3m+3 => n >= m+1 => n>1 Not sufficient.

But if we combine the both then n-1 is divisible by 3 when n>1 Thus C

n^2+n = n(n+1) is not divisible by 3 => n-1 is divisible by 3 IF N is no equal to 0,1,-1 else this wont hold true, thus not sufficient.

I guess you overlooked some facts,

Let me try to explain them with examples,

Say, n=0 then n(n+1) = 0 -> which is divisble by 3 and hence the st 1 is not valid for this example Now let n=1 then n(n+1) - > 2 which is not diviable by 3 but then n-1 = 0 which is divisble by 3 Now let n=-1 then n(n+1) = 0 which is again divisble y 3 and hence St 1 does not hold true for this example as well.

Cheers,

ok great catch ..but are you suggesting A or C then ?

I completely understand how statement 1 is sufficient, but am going to have to review statement 2 further to understand why it is not sufficient. I understand the simple math just not the explanation that follows.

Good question though. Had me thinking. Thank you very much.

Since we are told in Statement (1) that the product n^2+n is not divisible by 3, we know that neither n nor n + 1 is divisible by 3. Therefore it seems that n — 1 must be divisible by 3. However, this only holds if the integers in the consecutive set are nonzero integers. Since Statement (1) does not tell us this, it is not sufficient.

Since we are told in Statement (1) that the product n^2+n is not divisible by 3, we know that neither n nor n + 1 is divisible by 3. Therefore it seems that n — 1 must be divisible by 3. However, this only holds if the integers in the consecutive set are nonzero integers. Since Statement (1) does not tell us this, it is not sufficient.

I dont buy this ...

Neither.

Here is my logic:

We know this from the question stem: n = Set of all integers = {..., -6, -5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... }

1) n^2 + n is not divisible by 3

We now know: n = {... -11, -8, -5, -2, 1, 4, 7, 10, ...} <--- very clear pattern here

We are interested in n-1 (but only from the above set, which meet our condition imposed on 1) n - 1 = {..., -12, -9, -6, -3, 0, 3, 6, 9, ... }

Let's check these against what ware testing for, are these divisible by three? Very clearly, yes.

Since we are told in Statement (1) that the product n^2+n is not divisible by 3, we know that neither n nor n + 1 is divisible by 3. Therefore it seems that n — 1 must be divisible by 3. However, this only holds if the integers in the consecutive set are nonzero integers. Since Statement (1) does not tell us this, it is not sufficient. I dont buy this ...

Thanks Sudhir. Please notify MGMAT. Product of three consecutive integers must be divisible by 3 irrespective of 0, -ves or +ves.

(n-1)n(n+1) must be divisible by 3. n(n+1): Not Divisible (n-1): must be divisible _________________

Re: Given that n is an integer, is n 1 divisible by 3? (1) n^2 + [#permalink]

Show Tags

31 Mar 2013, 07:55

4

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

LalaB wrote:

Can experts say the final word regarding option (1)? I wonder whether A is sufficient

Given that n is an integer, is n — 1 divisible by 3?

(1) n^2 + n is not divisible by 3 --> n(n+1) is not divisible by 3 --> neither n nor n+1 is divisible by 3. Now, n-1, n and n+1 are three consecutive integers, thus one of them must be divisible by 3, so if n and n+1 are NOT, then n-1 must be. Sufficient.

(2) 3n +5 >= k+8 , where k is a positive multiple of 3. Not sufficient.

Re: Given that n is an integer, is n 1 divisible by 3? (1) n^2 + [#permalink]

Show Tags

02 Jun 2013, 13:25

Bunuel wrote:

LalaB wrote:

Can experts say the final word regarding option (1)? I wonder whether A is sufficient

Given that n is an integer, is n — 1 divisible by 3?

(1) n^2 + n is not divisible by 3 --> n(n+1) is not divisible by 3 --> neither n nor n+1 is divisible by 3. Now, n-1, n and n+1 are three consecutive integers, thus one of them must be divisible by 3, so if n and n+1 are NOT, then n-1 must be. Sufficient.

(2) 3n +5 >= k+8 , where k is a positive multiple of 3. Not sufficient.

Re: Given that n is an integer, is n 1 divisible by 3? (1) n^2 + [#permalink]

Show Tags

02 Jun 2013, 13:56

1

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

karjan07 wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

LalaB wrote:

Can experts say the final word regarding option (1)? I wonder whether A is sufficient

Given that n is an integer, is n — 1 divisible by 3?

(1) n^2 + n is not divisible by 3 --> n(n+1) is not divisible by 3 --> neither n nor n+1 is divisible by 3. Now, n-1, n and n+1 are three consecutive integers, thus one of them must be divisible by 3, so if n and n+1 are NOT, then n-1 must be. Sufficient.

(2) 3n +5 >= k+8 , where k is a positive multiple of 3. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hope it's clear.

Can you kindly explain why B is not sufficient...

Sure.

(2) says that 3n +5 >= k+8 , where k is a positive multiple of 3 --> k=3x, for some positive integer x --> \(3n +5\geq{3x+8}\) --> \(3n-3\geq{3x}\) --> \(n-1\geq{x}\). So, basically we just have that n-1 is greater or equal to some positive integer x, thus it may or may not be a multiple of 3.

Re: Given that n is an integer, is n 1 divisible by 3? (1) n^2 + [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Sep 2013, 06:12

Quote:

(2) says that 3n +5 >= k+8 , where k is a positive multiple of 3 --> k=3x, for some positive integer x --> \(3n +5\geq{3x+8}\) --> \(3n-3\geq{3x}\) --> \(n-1\geq{x}\). So, basically we just have that n-1 is greater or equal to some positive integer x, thus it may or may not be a multiple of 3.

Just to go a bit further on this, in what case would \(n-1\) be divisible by \(3\)? Say if you ended up with \(n-1\geq{3x}\) it would still be insufficient, is not it so? The fact that we have \(\geq\) seems to necessarily mean that \(n-1\) may not necessarily be divisible because we have so many options, or I am missing the point here? _________________

There are times when I do not mind kudos...I do enjoy giving some for help

Re: Given that n is an integer, is n 1 divisible by 3? (1) n^2 + [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Apr 2014, 04:25

Bunuel wrote:

LalaB wrote:

Can experts say the final word regarding option (1)? I wonder whether A is sufficient

Given that n is an integer, is n — 1 divisible by 3?

(1) n^2 + n is not divisible by 3 --> n(n+1) is not divisible by 3 --> neither n nor n+1 is divisible by 3. Now, n-1, n and n+1 are three consecutive integers, thus one of them must be divisible by 3, so if n and n+1 are NOT, then n-1 must be. Sufficient.

(2) 3n +5 >= k+8 , where k is a positive multiple of 3. Not sufficient.

Part 2 of the GMAT: How I tackled the GMAT and improved a disappointing score Apologies for the month gap. I went on vacation and had to finish up a...

I’m a little delirious because I’m a little sleep deprived. But whatever. I have to write this post because... I’M IN! Funnily enough, I actually missed the acceptance phone...

So the last couple of weeks have seen a flurry of discussion in our MBA class Whatsapp group around Brexit, the referendum and currency exchange. Most of us believed...

This highly influential bestseller was first published over 25 years ago. I had wanted to read this book for a long time and I finally got around to it...