Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 06:11 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 06:11

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Jun 2012
Posts: 54
Own Kudos [?]: 164 [14]
Given Kudos: 21
Send PM
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92912
Own Kudos [?]: 618935 [4]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2163
Own Kudos [?]: 1180 [0]
Given Kudos: 236
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE:General Management (Transportation)
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 18 Aug 2015
Posts: 16
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 9
Location: United States
GPA: 3.38
Send PM
Re: Given that p and q are positive, prime numbers greater than [#permalink]
Ok. I am really confused on this. If the first statement is not true, how can it be sufficient to answer the question. If the LCM is <140, then that proves this statement is false. Would any answer you arrive at using a false statement be false?
Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2163
Own Kudos [?]: 1180 [0]
Given Kudos: 236
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE:General Management (Transportation)
Send PM
Re: Given that p and q are positive, prime numbers greater than [#permalink]
mcm2112 wrote:
Ok. I am really confused on this. If the first statement is not true, how can it be sufficient to answer the question. If the LCM is <140, then that proves this statement is false. Would any answer you arrive at using a false statement be false?


Statements are always true
First statement says lcm is 140
Not that it is less than 140

Posted from my mobile device
Retired Moderator
Joined: 22 Aug 2013
Posts: 1186
Own Kudos [?]: 2499 [0]
Given Kudos: 459
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Given that p and q are positive, prime numbers greater than [#permalink]
mcm2112 wrote:
Ok. I am really confused on this. If the first statement is not true, how can it be sufficient to answer the question. If the LCM is <140, then that proves this statement is false. Would any answer you arrive at using a false statement be false?


Hi

When we consider a statement in DS questions, we have to take that statement to be completely true, and then try to arrive at an answer to the given question using the data of this statement.

So in case of first statement, we have to assume that LCM of 2p and 4q is 140 only, and then evaluate whether the required answer (product of 2p and 4q) can be found using this data.
If we can get a unique value for the required product, then we have found our answer and we conclude that the statement is sufficient,
But if we do not have a unique value, then the answer has not been found and we conclude that the statement is not sufficient.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 18 Aug 2015
Posts: 16
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 9
Location: United States
GPA: 3.38
Send PM
Re: Given that p and q are positive, prime numbers greater than [#permalink]
Apologies. I got it after correctly reading how mvictor explained the question.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Rotman '20
GMAT 1: 620 Q45 V36
GPA: 3.61
Send PM
Re: Given that p and q are positive, prime numbers greater than [#permalink]
can someone clarify the statement 2.
thanks
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92912
Own Kudos [?]: 618935 [0]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Re: Given that p and q are positive, prime numbers greater than [#permalink]
Expert Reply
akulsoni100 wrote:
can someone clarify the statement 2.
thanks


We know that p and q are primes greater than 3, so they are some odd primes.

(2) says: the Greatest Common Divisor (GCD) of 2p and 4q is 2. Now, since both p and q are primes greater than 3, then this will be true for any distinct p and q, for example, the GCD of 2*5 and 2*7 is 2. This is because primes do not share any common factor but 1.

The only case this won't be true is when p = q. For example, if p = q = 5, then GCD of 2*5 and 2*5 will be 10, not 2. So, this statement just implies that p≠q, thus any two different primes greater than 3 will satisfy this condition. Not sufficient.

Hope it's clear.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 32668
Own Kudos [?]: 821 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Given that p and q are positive, prime numbers greater than [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Given that p and q are positive, prime numbers greater than [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92912 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne