Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 30 Sep 2014, 06:06

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 229
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents [#permalink] New post 10 Aug 2006, 07:11
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents whose children attend private schools maintain that people making no use of a government service should not be forced to pay for it. Yet those who choose to buy bottled water rather than drink water from the local supply are not therefore exempt from paying taxes to maintain the local water supply.

Roger: Your argument is illogical. Children are required by law to attend school. Since school attendance is a matter not of choice, but of legal requirement, it is unfair for the government to force some parents to pay for it twice.

Which of the following responses by Gloria would best refute Roger’s charge that her argument is illogical?

(A) Although drinking water is not required by law, it is necessary for all people, and therefore my analogy is appropriate.
(B) Those who can afford the tuition at a high-priced private school can well bear the same tax burden as those whose children attend public schools.
(C) If tuition tax credits are granted, the tax burden on parents who choose public schools will rise to an intolerable level.
(D) The law does not say that parents must send their children to private schools, only that the children must attend some kind of school, whether public or private.
(E) Both bottled water and private schools are luxury items, and it is unfair that some citizens should be able to afford them while others cannot.


OA Later..
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2922
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Aug 2006, 08:05
Between A and D, I choose A. Will explain if correct.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 73
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Aug 2006, 09:41
I will go with D.

Roger's argument was about " sending to school" being a mandatory law. But if we consider "D", it is clearly stated that sending to private schools is not mandatory.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1474
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 13

 [#permalink] New post 10 Aug 2006, 09:42
ps_dahiya wrote:
Between A and D, I choose A. Will explain if correct.


I second A. Won't spoonfeed though :-)
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 532
Location: US
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Aug 2006, 10:28
I will go with D...

A is not correct because since her analogy was not questioned she wont mentioned it in her reply
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 716
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Aug 2006, 11:22
I will go with D for Sure.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 229
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Aug 2006, 11:56
OA is A.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 03 Jul 2006
Posts: 179
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Aug 2006, 12:22
why not 'C' ?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 73
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Aug 2006, 13:30
Can somebody explain why is it 'A'?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 445
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Aug 2006, 18:16
Rogers argument is that attending school is mandatory, not optional.
Gloria argues that drinking water too is not left to a person's choice. So, her argument holds good. (A)
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Posts: 332
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Taxation [#permalink] New post 11 Aug 2006, 11:52
i didn't understand Gloria's point.. Isn't water-example a counter argument for her own argument ?? What's her point ??

Can any one explain ??
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1419
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Taxation [#permalink] New post 11 Aug 2006, 12:08
sharadGmat wrote:
i didn't understand Gloria's point.. Isn't water-example a counter argument for her own argument ?? What's her point ??

Can any one explain ??


Gloria's point is for paying tax... she just mentions "THOSE people who think otherwise" to make her point.

so A could be rephrased like this:

even though going to a private school is not a law, education is necessary for all, therefore nobody is exempt from paying tuition tax
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Posts: 332
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Taxation [#permalink] New post 11 Aug 2006, 22:27
u2lover wrote:
sharadGmat wrote:
i didn't understand Gloria's point.. Isn't water-example a counter argument for her own argument ?? What's her point ??

Can any one explain ??


Gloria's point is for paying tax... she just mentions "THOSE people who think otherwise" to make her point.

so A could be rephrased like this:

even though going to a private school is not a law, education is necessary for all, therefore nobody is exempt from paying tuition tax


thanks U2lover.. After rereading I am able to understand Gloria's point..
She is basically saying "everybody should pay school taxes', correct ?
Intially I thought she was saying "those sending their kids to private schools need to be exempt from taxes".. Her argument structure kind of confused me...
Re: CR: Taxation   [#permalink] 11 Aug 2006, 22:27
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents shrutisingh 11 14 Jul 2009, 22:57
Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents rdg 6 19 Feb 2007, 13:27
Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents pawan82 13 10 Nov 2006, 23:01
Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents vineetgupta 6 10 Nov 2006, 18:46
Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents ywilfred 3 07 Sep 2005, 06:23
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.