Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Jul 2014, 06:40

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Aug 2008
Posts: 234
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents [#permalink] New post 14 Nov 2008, 01:37
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents whose children attend private schools maintain that people making no use of a government service should not be forced to pay for it. Yet those who choose to buy bottled water rather than drink water from the local supply are not therefore exempt from paying taxes to maintain the local water supply.
Roger: Your argument is illogical. Children are required by law to attend school. Since school attendance is a matter not of choice, but of legal requirement, it is unfair for the government to force some parents to pay for it twice.
Which of the following responses by Gloria would best refute Roger’s charge that her argument is illogical?

(A) Although drinking water is not required by law, it is necessary for all people, and therefore my analogy is appropriate.
(B) Those who can afford the tuition at a high-priced private school can well bear the same tax burden as those whose children attend public schools.
(C) If tuition tax credits are granted, the tax burden on parents who choose public schools will rise to an intolerable level.
(D) The law does not say that parents must send their children to private schools, only that the children must attend some kind of school, whether public or private.
(E) Both bottled water and private schools are luxury items, and it is unfair that some citizens should be able to afford them while others cannot
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 24 Jul 2008
Posts: 32
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR:ANALOGY FOR EXEMPTION [#permalink] New post 14 Nov 2008, 02:33
IMO - D
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Posts: 108
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Re: CR:ANALOGY FOR EXEMPTION [#permalink] New post 14 Nov 2008, 08:38
D
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Posts: 309
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR:ANALOGY FOR EXEMPTION [#permalink] New post 14 Nov 2008, 12:32
between A and D
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Jun 2008
Posts: 82
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: CR:ANALOGY FOR EXEMPTION [#permalink] New post 14 Nov 2008, 12:59
IMO D.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Aug 2008
Posts: 234
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR:ANALOGY FOR EXEMPTION [#permalink] New post 14 Nov 2008, 13:19
OA is A guys...
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Oct 2008
Posts: 119
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

Re: CR:ANALOGY FOR EXEMPTION [#permalink] New post 15 Nov 2008, 18:13
An interesting one -- the answer is A, without any doubt. In order to understand why, we have to start by understanding exactly how Roger is attacking Gloria. Without knowing that, we can't reliably determine how to refute the attack.

Gloria's argument is obviously an analogy: Her evidence is that there is nothing wrong with forcing people to pay taxes to support the local water supply, even if they choose not to buy "non-government" water instead of using the "government" supply. She concludes (by analogy) that there is nothing wrong with forcing people to pay taxes to support schools, even if they choose to buy "non-government" education instead of using the "government" schools.

Roger replies by saying that because people are forced to attend school of some type by law, those who choose not to use "government" schools must pay twice, and this is unfair. He claims that this makes Gloria's argument illogical. Because her argument was constructed by analogy, the only way to make it "illogical" would be to show that the analogy does not hold -- i.e., that the two things being compared are NOT alike in the ways that they should be alike if the argument is to work.

Therefore, when Roger claims that his statement makes Gloria's argument "illogical", he is actually claiming that the critical piece of evidence in his argument -- the fact that people are forced to attend school by law -- is NOT true for water. Choice A refutes this by pointing out that people ARE forced to drink water, although the compulsion comes from physical necessity, not from law.

Choice D is unrelated to the structure of Gloria's argument, and so it can neither refute nor support the charge of illogicality. In fact, both Roger and Gloria have accepted the truth of Choice D from the outset. Roger states it, and neither of Gloria's statements would make sense if she did not accept Choice D as true.

_________________

Grumpy

Kaplan Canada LSAT/GMAT/GRE teacher and tutor

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Apr 2008
Posts: 452
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 1

Re: CR:ANALOGY FOR EXEMPTION [#permalink] New post 16 Nov 2008, 03:43
IMO A)
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Posts: 497
Schools: Kellogg, MIT, Michigan, Berkeley, Marshall, Mellon
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 13

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR:ANALOGY FOR EXEMPTION [#permalink] New post 16 Nov 2008, 09:16
what is the source of this question?

Thanks

_________________

mates, please visit my profile and leave comments
johnlewis1980-s-profile-feedback-is-more-than-welcome-80538.html

I'm not linked to GMAT questions anymore, so, if you need something, please PM me

I'm already focused on my application package :)

My experience in my second attempt
http://gmatclub.com/forum/p544312#p544312
My experience in my third attempt
630-q-47-v-28-engineer-non-native-speaker-my-experience-78215.html#p588275

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Aug 2008
Posts: 234
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR:ANALOGY FOR EXEMPTION [#permalink] New post 18 Nov 2008, 00:52
from the Gmat Verbal Sets..
Re: CR:ANALOGY FOR EXEMPTION   [#permalink] 18 Nov 2008, 00:52
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents pawan82 13 10 Nov 2006, 23:01
Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents vineetgupta 6 10 Nov 2006, 18:46
Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents gmatcrook 12 10 Aug 2006, 07:11
Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents ywilfred 3 07 Sep 2005, 06:23
Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents gmataquaguy 7 31 Jul 2004, 18:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.