Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Nov 2014, 09:20

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Posts: 447
GMAT 1: Q V
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 80 [0], given: 157

Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents [#permalink] New post 28 May 2010, 03:59
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

38% (02:28) correct 62% (01:44) wrong based on 27 sessions
Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents whose children attend private schools maintain that people making no use of a government service should not be forced to pay for it. Yet those who choose to buy bottled water rather than drink water from the local supply are not therefore exempt from paying taxes to maintain the local water supply.
Roger: Your argument is illogical. Children are required by law to attend school. Since school attendance is a matter not of choice, but of legal requirement, it is unfair for the government to force some parents to pay for it twice.

Which of the following responses by Gloria would best refute Roger’s charge that her argument is illogical?

(A) Although drinking water is not required by law, it is necessary for all people, and therefore my analogy is appropriate.
(B) Those who can afford the tuition at a high-priced private school can well bear the same tax burden as those whose children attend public schools.
(C) If tuition tax credits are granted, the tax burden on parents who choose public schools will rise to an intolerable level.
(D) The law does not say that parents must send their children to private schools, only that the children must attend some kind of school, whether public or private.
(E) Both bottled water and private schools are luxury items, and it is unfair that some citizens should be able to afford them while others cannot.
_________________

If you found the reply to be helpful, give kudos.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Apr 2010
Posts: 79
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 1

Re: Govt or Private Schools [#permalink] New post 28 May 2010, 05:22
IMO D

Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents whose children attend private schools maintain that people making no use of a government service should not be forced to pay for it. Yet those who choose to buy bottled water rather than drink water from the local supply are not therefore exempt from paying taxes to maintain the local water supply.
Roger: Your argument is illogical. Children are required by law to attend school. Since school attendance is a matter not of choice, but of legal requirement, it is unfair for the government to force some parents to pay for it twice.

Which of the following responses by Gloria would best refute Roger’s charge that her argument is illogical?
(A) Although drinking water is not required by law, it is necessary for all people, and therefore my analogy is appropriate.
(B) Those who can afford the tuition at a high-priced private school can well bear the same tax burden as those whose children attend public schools.
(C) If tuition tax credits are granted, the tax burden on parents who choose public schools will rise to an intolerable level.
(D) The law does not say that parents must send their children to private schools, only that the children must attend some kind of school, whether public or private.
-- the law makes mandatory for children to attend school not necessarily private school..
(E) Both bottled water and private schools are luxury items, and it is unfair that some citizens should be able to afford them while others cannot.
BSchool Thread Master
avatar
Joined: 19 Feb 2010
Posts: 401
Followers: 20

Kudos [?]: 129 [0], given: 76

Re: Govt or Private Schools [#permalink] New post 28 May 2010, 06:47
BlueRobin wrote:
Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents whose children attend private schools maintain that people making no use of a government service should not be forced to pay for it. Yet those who choose to buy bottled water rather than drink water from the local supply are not therefore exempt from paying taxes to maintain the local water supply.
Roger: Your argument is illogical. Children are required by law to attend school. Since school attendance is a matter not of choice, but of legal requirement, it is unfair for the government to force some parents to pay for it twice.

Which of the following responses by Gloria would best refute Roger’s charge that her argument is illogical?

(A) Although drinking water is not required by law, it is necessary for all people, and therefore my analogy is appropriate.
(B) Those who can afford the tuition at a high-priced private school can well bear the same tax burden as those whose children attend public schools.
(C) If tuition tax credits are granted, the tax burden on parents who choose public schools will rise to an intolerable level.
(D) The law does not say that parents must send their children to private schools, only that the children must attend some kind of school, whether public or private.
(E) Both bottled water and private schools are luxury items, and it is unfair that some citizens should be able to afford them while others cannot.


Very interesting question. I didn't find an answer that would perfectly refute Roger's charge. But I think the closest is D.
In the reasoning of both Gloria and Roger, choice matters. Gloria mentions those who choose bottled water over locally supplied water. Roger argues that parents can't choose, they are forced by law to send children to school. Therefore, I think that to be able to refute Roger's charge that Gloria's argument is illogical, we need an answer choice that makes the point about the "choice" vs "law force".
A doesn't play down Roger's claim that education is forced by law, just supports that drinking water is not required. Not that relevant for me.
B. Affordability is not the issue.
C. Tax burden is not the issue.
D. Corrects Roger's assumption that parents are 'forced' to send their children to private school.
E. Fair or just is not the issue.

Please reveal the OA.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2009
Posts: 67
Location: Astoria, NYC
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 1

Re: Govt or Private Schools [#permalink] New post 28 May 2010, 09:18
D refutes rogers statements
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 24 Aug 2007
Posts: 956
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain
Followers: 55

Kudos [?]: 752 [0], given: 40

Re: Govt or Private Schools [#permalink] New post 01 Jun 2010, 00:59
D cant be wrong. We need a premise from Gloria to support her claim not from Roger to support his claim. OA is A. Please check the discussion:

cr-doubt-80908.html
_________________

Want to improve your CR: cr-methods-an-approach-to-find-the-best-answers-93146.html
Tricky Quant problems: 50-tricky-questions-92834.html
Important Grammer Fundamentals: key-fundamentals-of-grammer-our-crucial-learnings-on-sc-93659.html

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Posts: 447
GMAT 1: Q V
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 80 [1] , given: 157

Re: Govt or Private Schools [#permalink] New post 01 Jun 2010, 05:31
1
This post received
KUDOS
OA is A

BlueRobin wrote:
Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents whose children attend private schools maintain that people making no use of a government service should not be forced to pay for it. Yet those who choose to buy bottled water rather than drink water from the local supply are not therefore exempt from paying taxes to maintain the local water supply.
Roger: Your argument is illogical. Children are required by law to attend school. Since school attendance is a matter not of choice, but of legal requirement, it is unfair for the government to force some parents to pay for it twice.

Which of the following responses by Gloria would best refute Roger’s charge that her argument is illogical?

(A) Although drinking water is not required by law, it is necessary for all people, and therefore my analogy is appropriate.
(B) Those who can afford the tuition at a high-priced private school can well bear the same tax burden as those whose children attend public schools.
(C) If tuition tax credits are granted, the tax burden on parents who choose public schools will rise to an intolerable level.
(D) The law does not say that parents must send their children to private schools, only that the children must attend some kind of school, whether public or private.
(E) Both bottled water and private schools are luxury items, and it is unfair that some citizens should be able to afford them while others cannot.


What is the argument?

Gloria: tax must be paid for attending private school, just as tax is paid for bottled water even though normal water is available, since its a preference tax needs to be paid.

Roger:That is the most outrageous thing i heard, because children need to attend school by law and theyre already doing a big favour by going to school so they should not be taxed.

Gloria if she says:Even though drinking water is not required by law, every body needs it, and even though they are not being forced by law the people are paying for their preference, since she compared public schools private schools with normal water bottled water where drinking water is not required by law, and people are paying for a preference so why should they not pay for their preference when attending school.
_________________

If you found the reply to be helpful, give kudos.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Posts: 178
Location: Singapore
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 5

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Govt or Private Schools [#permalink] New post 01 Jun 2010, 07:31
Thanks for explanation. Required some critical reading and then reasoning...
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Posts: 447
GMAT 1: Q V
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 80 [0], given: 157

Re: Govt or Private Schools [#permalink] New post 01 Jun 2010, 11:49
Thanks, Can i ask you how ur working on improving your CR, as even i felt that the answer was not A at first, after seeing the OA i corrected myself.

It is really confusing and convoluted anyway rather than a simple answer.

Are you following Powerscore Gmat Bible.
_________________

If you found the reply to be helpful, give kudos.

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 657
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 89 [0], given: 51

Re: Govt or Private Schools [#permalink] New post 25 Apr 2011, 09:53
these are exactly the kind of questions which i get wrong and which hurt my verbal score.
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

VP
VP
avatar
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1362
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 147 [0], given: 10

Re: Govt or Private Schools [#permalink] New post 25 Apr 2011, 23:53
Between A and D,D supports Roger's argument about Law.Hence POE.
OA has to be A.
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Re: Govt or Private Schools   [#permalink] 25 Apr 2011, 23:53
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents bholakc 13 02 Sep 2011, 08:10
3 Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents shrutisingh 11 14 Jul 2009, 22:57
Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents sidbidus 10 18 Jun 2007, 17:57
Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents johnycute 1 03 Jun 2007, 00:10
Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents gmatcrook 12 10 Aug 2006, 07:11
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.