Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!
Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club
Registration gives you:
Tests
Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.
Applicant Stats
View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more
Books/Downloads
Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Statement 1: xy=6 => 5x = (6/x) + 7 => 5x^2 - 7x - 6 =0 => (x-2)(5x+3)=0 => x = 2 or x= -3/5. So the solutions sets are (x,y) = (2,3) and (-3/5,-10). In case 1, x-y<0 and in case 2, x-y>0. Insufficient.
Statement 2: x and y are consecutive integers with the same sign. Take x=k and y=k+1 => 5k = (k+1) + 7 => k=2. So one possible solution is x=2,y=3. Take y=k and x=k+1 => 5(k+1) = k + 7 => k = 1/2. So no solution possible in integers. Therefore x-y<0. Sufficient.
=> x = 2 or x= -3/5. So the solutions sets are (x,y) = (2,3) and (-3/5,-10). In both cases, x-y>0. Sufficient.
isn't st-1 insufficient because of the above solution set? if (x,y) = (2,3), then x-y=2-3 = -1. a 'no' if (x,y) = (-3/5,-10), then x-y=-3/5+10= 47/5. a 'yes'
Bunuel, I checked The link you gave . There m has to be greater than n. But here in this question, it is given that x and y are consecutive. Meaning of consecutive from google indicates that y follows x..
con·sec·u·tive /kənˈsekyətiv/ Adjective Following continuously. In unbroken or logical sequence. Synonyms successive - sequential - running - sequent - serial
So y has to be bigger than x right? _________________
hope is a good thing, maybe the best of things. And no good thing ever dies.
Bunuel, I checked The link you gave . There m has to be greater than n. But here in this question, it is given that x and y are consecutive. Meaning of consecutive from google indicates that y follows x..
con·sec·u·tive /kənˈsekyətiv/ Adjective Following continuously. In unbroken or logical sequence. Synonyms successive - sequential - running - sequent - serial
So y has to be bigger than x right?
Google is not conducting the test, GMAC does. _________________