Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

GMAT Diagnostic Test Question 12 [#permalink]
06 Jun 2009, 21:09

5

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

6

This post was BOOKMARKED

GMAT Diagnostic Test Question 12 Field: special characters, divisibility Difficulty: 700

If N = 1234@ and @ represents the units digit, is N a multiple of 5?

(1) @! is not divisible by 5 (2) @ is divisible by 9

A. Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but Statement (2) ALONE is not sufficient B. Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but Statement (1) ALONE is not sufficient C. BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient D. EACH statement ALONE is sufficient E. Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient _________________

Re: GMAT Diagnostic Test Question 11 [#permalink]
07 Jun 2009, 16:02

3

This post received KUDOS

Explanation Official Answer: C

1234@ to be divisible by 5, symbol "@" should represent either 0 or 5. So the question asks whether @ equals to 0 or 5.

(1) @! is not divisible by 5 --> @ can be 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 (note that 0!=1). Not sufficient. (2) @ is divisible by 9 --> @ can be 0 or 9 (note that zero is divisible by every integer except zero itself). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Intersection of the values for @ from (1) and (2) is @=0. Sufficient.

Solution 2:

From 1: @ could be 0, 1 or 2 or 3 or 4. If @ = 0, @! = 1, N is divisible by 5. If @ = 1, @! = 1, N is not divisible by 5. If @ = 2, @! = 2, N is not divisible by 5. If @ = 3, @! = 6, N is not divisible by 5. If @ = 4, @! = 24, N is not divisible by 5.

So @ could be 0, 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 but not >4. NSF

2: @ could be 0 or 9. NSF

From 1 and 2 together: @ is 0. So 1 and 2 are sufficient and OA is C. _________________

Yes, zero is divisible by any number, though this is usually not tested on the GMAT 0 *5 = 0, so similarly \(\frac{0}{5} = 0\). Again, this is outside of GMAT scope but helpful to know. _________________

I dont think this question represents a question likely to appear on gmat as the concepts tested in this q have never appeared in my experience. Suggestions?

I dont think this question represents a question likely to appear on gmat as the concepts tested in this q have never appeared in my experience. Suggestions?

Are you talking about 0! and \(\frac{0}{5}\) or is there something else? I believe these are two minor points that do come up as a part of the explanation but do not play a big role in the question _________________

I dont think this question represents a question likely to appear on gmat as the concepts tested in this q have never appeared in my experience. Suggestions?

Are you talking about 0! and \(\frac{0}{5}\) or is there something else? I believe these are two minor points that do come up as a part of the explanation but do not play a big role in the question

Yes I was talking about the 0! and 0/5. It is definitely good to know about it before the test date though. Thanks

Re: GMAT Diagnostic Test Question 11 [#permalink]
03 Dec 2009, 18:37

N = 1234@ and @ represents the units digit, is N a multiple of 5?

(1) @! is not divisible by 5 (2) @ is divisible by 9

======= (1)@! is not divisible by 5 so @ is not 0 or 5==> N is not a multiple of 5==> can answer the question (2)@ is divisible by 9 so @ is 0 or 9; if it is 0 ==> N is a multiple of 5; if @ is 9 N is not a multiple of 5==>Not sufficiency! I choose A Please give me the feedback !

Please explain how "@ could definitely be 0 or 9". I'm sorry but I just can't seem to grasp this one. I think that the answer is B becuse if 1234@ is divisible by 9, the only number that @ could possibly be is 8, and if @ is 8 then we definitely know that 1234@ is not divisible by 5, hence 2 is sufficient and the answer is B.

previous poster - it says that @ is divisible by 9, not 1234@ is divisible by 9.

Can someone cite an official source that claims 0 is divisible by every number? I've never heard this and couldn't find it with a quick google search. I understand the problem otherwise...but that seems like such a technicality that 0 is divisible by any number... not something real.

I can't find an official source citing that. Zero is divisible by any non-zero number. Think of it this way.

Any number multiplied by zero gives zero. Thus, zero is divisible by any number. Analogy:

\(3*3=9\) --> 9 is divisible by 3 \(3*0=0\) --> 0 is divisible by 3

\(\frac{9}{3} = 3\) --> 9 is divisible by 3 \(\frac{0}{3} = 0\) --> 0 is divisible by 3 (and any non-zero number)

I know it may seem weird. Folks, please correct me if I'm wrong.

I'm not 100% sure if you can face this concept on the GMAT though.

shammokando wrote:

previous poster - it says that @ is divisible by 9, not 1234@ is divisible by 9.

Can someone cite an official source that claims 0 is divisible by every number? I've never heard this and couldn't find it with a quick google search. I understand the problem otherwise...but that seems like such a technicality that 0 is divisible by any number... not something real.

I understand the technical aspects. But it's like how 1 is a factor to every number. It's obviously true but widely understood that you never need to specify or rely on that fact as a rule to solve something.

dzyubam wrote:

I can't find an official source citing that. Zero is divisible by any non-zero number. Think of it this way.

Any number multiplied by zero gives zero. Thus, zero is divisible by any number. Analogy:

\(3*3=9\) --> 9 is divisible by 3 \(3*0=0\) --> 0 is divisible by 3

\(\frac{9}{3} = 3\) --> 9 is divisible by 3 \(\frac{0}{3} = 0\) --> 0 is divisible by 3 (and any non-zero number)

I know it may seem weird. Folks, please correct me if I'm wrong.

I'm not 100% sure if you can face this concept on the GMAT though.

shammokando wrote:

previous poster - it says that @ is divisible by 9, not 1234@ is divisible by 9.

Can someone cite an official source that claims 0 is divisible by every number? I've never heard this and couldn't find it with a quick google search. I understand the problem otherwise...but that seems like such a technicality that 0 is divisible by any number... not something real.