Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 15:57 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 15:57

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92900
Own Kudos [?]: 618811 [89]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92900
Own Kudos [?]: 618811 [25]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 12 Aug 2015
Posts: 3
Own Kudos [?]: 12 [4]
Given Kudos: 2
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 19 Oct 2012
Posts: 222
Own Kudos [?]: 538 [0]
Given Kudos: 103
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V35
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V38
GPA: 3.81
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: D01-29 [#permalink]
mystseen wrote:
Hi Bunuel -

What was your thought process in not setting T/M = 1/2 and T+R/J = 1/2 equal to each other? That is, T/M = T+R/J? I was stuck after I did such (algebraic mess, and leads you to the wrong conclusion). Would be great to learn your thought process.



Here the idea is to find the value of 'J'. Therefore, the focus should be to eliminate the extra variables where ever you can. I was also stuck with the same bit as you did, but i realized that one can eliminate the variable 'T' by substituting the variable 'T' in the other equation (Jack's equation) which kinda did the trick as I was left with an equation with only M, R and J.
Hope this helps a little bit.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 Jul 2015
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 5
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.6
Send PM
Re: D01-29 [#permalink]
I think this is a high-quality question and I agree with explanation.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 19 Jun 2014
Posts: 8
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: D01-29 [#permalink]
I think this is a high-quality question and I agree with explanation.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 12 Feb 2016
Posts: 3
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: D01-29 [#permalink]
This is definitely a high quality question. I solve it using a number of variable approach and i want to ask to some math expert whether it is correct.

===R================T===========W
*==(1/m)+(1/t)=========t==========(t/m)+(t/j) => in time = t M&J working together complete \((t/m)+(t/j)\)

**==1/j===========((mj/m+j-t)====== 1-((t/m)+(t/j)) J works at his constant rate \(1/j\) for the remaining time which is equal to \(((1/m)+(1/j))- t\)

We are asked to find j:
from ** we can multiply R*T=W and find a single equation in 3 unknowns therefore we need stat 1 and stat 2 which gives us 2 unknown to find the third one.
Is the process correct ?
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Mar 2016
Posts: 325
Own Kudos [?]: 195 [0]
Given Kudos: 197
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V34
GPA: 3.8
WE:Operations (Commercial Banking)
Send PM
Re: D01-29 [#permalink]
I think this is a high-quality question and I agree with explanation.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 11 Feb 2015
Posts: 73
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [0]
Given Kudos: 16
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: Duke '20 (A)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.7
WE:Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: D01-29 [#permalink]
I think this is a high-quality question and I agree with explanation.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 Nov 2016
Posts: 44
Own Kudos [?]: 67 [0]
Given Kudos: 21
Location: United States (MN)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.51
Send PM
Re: D01-29 [#permalink]
Maybe I don't understand this completely. I understand that T/M = (R+T)/J. If W is the total work done, then both of these equal W/2. Thus, it's clear that T/M=(R+T)/J=W/2.

How can you say that T/M=1/2, when you don't know how much work was done? Which part of this question allows us to say that W=1, thus T/M=(R+T)/J=1/2?? Ie, which part of the prompt restrict the variables such that we know W=1?
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92900
Own Kudos [?]: 618811 [0]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
Re: D01-29 [#permalink]
Expert Reply
brooklyndude wrote:
Maybe I don't understand this completely. I understand that T/M = (R+T)/J. If W is the total work done, then both of these equal W/2. Thus, it's clear that T/M=(R+T)/J=W/2.

How can you say that T/M=1/2, when you don't know how much work was done? Which part of this question allows us to say that W=1, thus T/M=(R+T)/J=1/2?? Ie, which part of the prompt restrict the variables such that we know W=1?


We consider the whole work to be done as 1 unit of work or as 100% of the work. So, T/M=1/2 means that Mac completed half (50%) of the work whatever this work is.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 Oct 2015
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 30
Send PM
Re: D01-29 [#permalink]
I think this is a high quality question and l agree with the explanation
Intern
Intern
Joined: 17 Jul 2018
Posts: 11
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 5
GMAT 1: 710 Q47 V39
GPA: 3.51
Send PM
Re: D01-29 [#permalink]
When you say "T/M" part of the job...why are we putting time over rate? W=RT...so I don't understand why we are putting the number of days, T (time), over the rate (M).

Same thing for the other equation.

Thank you
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92900
Own Kudos [?]: 618811 [0]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
Re: D01-29 [#permalink]
Expert Reply
leonsandcastle332 wrote:
When you say "T/M" part of the job...why are we putting time over rate? W=RT...so I don't understand why we are putting the number of days, T (time), over the rate (M).

Same thing for the other equation.

Thank you


Both M and T denote time:
Mac can finish the job in M days (the rate is 1/M, so job over time);
Mac worked for T days.

In T days Mac does T/M part of the job.

Consider this: say Mac needs 2 days to do the job. In 1 day he does 1/2 part of the job.

Hope it's clear.
VP
VP
Joined: 13 Apr 2013
Status:It's near - I can see.
Posts: 1479
Own Kudos [?]: 1601 [0]
Given Kudos: 1002
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Operations
GPA: 3.01
WE:Engineering (Real Estate)
Send PM
Re: D01-29 [#permalink]
I think this is a high-quality question and I agree with explanation. Great question as always.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 Feb 2018
Posts: 26
Own Kudos [?]: 25 [0]
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GPA: 3.35
WE:Military Officer (Military & Defense)
Send PM
Re: D01-29 [#permalink]
I think this is a high-quality question and I agree with explanation.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 14 Jan 2018
Status:Victory is never a one time thing.
Posts: 31
Own Kudos [?]: 55 [0]
Given Kudos: 147
Location: Oman
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 590 Q49 V21
GMAT 2: 650 Q47 V33
GPA: 3.8
Send PM
Re: D01-29 [#permalink]
I think this is a high-quality question and I agree with explanation.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 10 Aug 2014
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 5
Send PM
Re: D01-29 [#permalink]
I think this is a high-quality question and I agree with explanation. great
Intern
Intern
Joined: 26 Sep 2017
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V41
Send PM
Re: D01-29 [#permalink]
1
Kudos
I think this is a high-quality question and I agree with explanation.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 31 May 2019
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
Re: D01-29 [#permalink]
This is a great question
GMAT Club Bot
Re: D01-29 [#permalink]
 1   2   
Moderator:
Math Expert
92900 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne