Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 27 Apr 2015, 13:19

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

GMATPrep Question - Math_DS

 Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 118
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

GMATPrep Question - Math_DS [#permalink]  19 Aug 2006, 04:17
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Here a GMATPrep question. Kindly disregard the marked answer.
Attachments

math_DS1.JPG [ 91.02 KiB | Viewed 569 times ]

_________________

All the best!!
shinewine

 Kaplan Promo Code Knewton GMAT Discount Codes Veritas Prep GMAT Discount Codes
Intern
Joined: 26 Apr 2005
Posts: 19
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]  19 Aug 2006, 09:53
I think it is D
Statement 1 tells us N(ft at y)/N(pt at y) < N(ft at Z)/N(pt at Z)
for 100 Ft and 100 Pt, i can have 20ft/30pt for y and then 80ft/70pt for X

thus x > Z
suff..

Statement 2
Take if Z has 100 FT and 100 parttime
X has more than half full time and Y has more than half parttime..
meaning
N(ft at X)/N(pt at X) will always be > 1 (say 51/49...51 full time and 49 partime at X )
Sufficient

Hence D
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 04 Jul 2006
Posts: 1268
Location: Madrid
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 154 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]  20 Aug 2006, 00:08
Inituition says D here!

Let's see if I have the math to confirm it. Employees are either full time or part time. So we can simplify the question a little

If px, py and pz are the precentages of the employees of div. X, div. Y and Z that all full time, and nx, ny and nz the numbers of employees in X, Y and Z (nz=nx+ny) the question is equivalent to:

Is px > pz?

In general pz(nx+ny)=nypy+nxpx
ny(pz-py)+nxpz=nxpx

(1) says that pz-py > 0

So, nxpz<nxpx and pz<px SUFF

Really, when you think about it, it makes sense that either pz is between py and pz or px=py=pz ... (1) says py<pz , so it must be that pz<px

(2) Suppose pz ≥ px. Thus py ≥ pz and 1-px≥ 1-pz≥ 1-py

pxnx> 0.5nzpz So nx>0.5nz (a)

(1-py)ny>0.5(1-pz)nz. So ny>0.5nz (b)

Adding (a) and (b) we get, nx+ny>nz

However, as there is no overlap between divisions X and Y, this can't be true.

Thus px>pz SUFF

Answer D
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Apr 2006
Posts: 499
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]  20 Aug 2006, 13:53
Yeah I would go with D on this, both seem to work for solutions.
Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 118
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]  20 Aug 2006, 13:54
kevincan wrote:
Inituition says D here!

Let's see if I have the math to confirm it. Employees are either full time or part time. So we can simplify the question a little

If px, py and pz are the precentages of the employees of div. X, div. Y and Z that all full time, and nx, ny and nz the numbers of employees in X, Y and Z (nz=nx+ny) the question is equivalent to:

Is px > pz?

In general pz(nx+ny)=nypy+nxpx
ny(pz-py)+nxpz=nxpx

(1) says that pz-py > 0

So, nxpz<nxpx and pz<px SUFF

Really, when you think about it, it makes sense that either pz is between py and pz or px=py=pz ... (1) says py<pz , so it must be that pz<px

(2) Suppose pz ≥ px. Thus py ≥ pz and 1-px≥ 1-pz≥ 1-py

pxnx> 0.5nzpz So nx>0.5nz (a)

(1-py)ny>0.5(1-pz)nz. So ny>0.5nz (b)

Adding (a) and (b) we get, nx+ny>nz

However, as there is no overlap between divisions X and Y, this can't be true.

Thus px>pz SUFF

Answer D

Wao... simply amazing..thank you..
_________________

All the best!!
shinewine

[#permalink] 20 Aug 2006, 13:54
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Math DS (m05q29) 12 18 Oct 2007, 10:27
1 GMATPRep Maths DS 1 16 Mar 2008, 14:32
Is it a error in the OG 11 in Maths DS question no 141? 2 02 Mar 2008, 04:03
Math DS questions - Help with solution 3 13 Jun 2007, 07:11
Help with a kaplan math DS question - Mistake in book? 6 25 Oct 2005, 14:58
Display posts from previous: Sort by

GMATPrep Question - Math_DS

 Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.