Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 28 Jun 2016, 10:33
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Government representative: Between 1996 and 2005, the gray

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2011
Posts: 213
GPA: 3.46
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 221 [0], given: 172

Premium Member
Government representative: Between 1996 and 2005, the gray [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Mar 2014, 08:39
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

77% (02:10) correct 23% (01:22) wrong based on 112 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Government representative: Between 1996 and 2005, the gray wolf popula­tion in Minnesota grew nearly 50 percent; the gray wolf population in Montana increased by only 13 percent during the same period. Clearly, the Minnesota gray wolf population is more likely to survive and thrive long term.

Environmentalist: But the gray wolf population in Montana is nearly 8 times the population in Minnesota; above a certain critical breeding number, the popula­ tion is stable and does not require growth in order to survive.

The environmentalist challenges the government representative's argument by doing which of the following?
(A) introducing additional evidence that undermines an assumption made by the representative
(B) challenging the representative's definition of a critical breeding number
(C) demonstrating that the critical breeding number of the two wolf popula­tions differs significantly
(D) implying that the two populations of wolves could be combined in order to preserve the species
(E) suggesting that the Montana wolf population grew at a faster rate than stated in the representative's argument

Please explain your reasoning for your answers. Will post OA soon :-)
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by mba1382 on 10 Mar 2014, 18:04, edited 1 time in total.
4 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 17 Sep 2013
Posts: 394
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V38
WE: Analyst (Consulting)
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 224 [4] , given: 139

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Government representative: Between 1996 and 2005, the gray [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Mar 2014, 09:25
4
This post received
KUDOS
A- The representative assumes that the % of growth is the only criterion for deciding whether or not a species is endangered.The Envormmentalist introduces another criterion , the critical breeding number, which undermines the assumption of the GR.

B- Naaa

C- The GR did not even consider Critical breeding ... in his argument

D- :shock:

E- Naaa
_________________

Appreciate the efforts...KUDOS for all
Don't let an extra chromosome get you down..:P

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 03 Dec 2013
Posts: 67
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 56 [1] , given: 35

Re: Government representative: Between 1996 and 2005, the gray [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Mar 2014, 11:55
1
This post received
KUDOS
I would go for A
Here goes my reasoning.

(A) introducing additional evidence that undermines an assumption made by the representative
Correct: Assumption made by GR is "the growth of population decides the probability of survival". This assumption is challenged and undermined by Environmentalist.

(B) challenging the representative's definition of a critical breeding number
Out of scope.

(C) demonstrating that the critical breeding number of the two wolf popula­tions differs significantly
Critical breeding number is never compared for two breeds. Irrelevant.

(D) implying that the two populations of wolves could be combined in order to preserve the species
Out of scope.

(E) suggesting that the Montana wolf population grew at a faster rate than stated in the representative's argument
Never done this. Irrelevant.
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2013
Posts: 273
Location: India
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 76 [1] , given: 29

Re: Government representative: Between 1996 and 2005, the gray [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Mar 2014, 19:20
1
This post received
KUDOS
Option A.
GR:GW pop. In Minnesota grew at a faster rate than that in Montana.
Conclusion-Minnesota's GW Pop is MORE LIKELY TO SURVIVE AND THRIVE IN THE LONG TERM.
The GR is assuming that ONLY GROWTH=long term survival.
The env. Undermines this assumption by contending that above a certain CB NUMBER(additional evidence),pop. DOESNT NEED GROWTH TO SURVIVE AND THRIVE IN THE LONG TERM.

Posted from my mobile device Image
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Mar 2012
Posts: 196
Schools: Schulich '16
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 4

Re: Government representative: Between 1996 and 2005, the gray [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Mar 2014, 02:20
clearly A..an easy question though.

The environmenatlist gives an additional evidence (critical breeding number) which undermines the the claim made by the representative.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 8067
Followers: 738

Kudos [?]: 152 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Government representative: Between 1996 and 2005, the gray [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Feb 2016, 05:10
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Government representative: Between 1996 and 2005, the gray   [#permalink] 05 Feb 2016, 05:10
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Experts publish their posts in the topic RATT Race: Between 1997 and 2005 souvik101990 9 22 Apr 2016, 10:05
Experts publish their posts in the topic Road to V42: Between 1996 and 2005, the gray wolf popula­tion souvik101990 2 04 Feb 2016, 23:40
Between 1971 and 1975, the government office that monitors rohitgoel15 5 14 Jul 2010, 02:57
2 Columnist on the arts: My elected government representatives noboru 6 26 Jun 2010, 13:31
Between 1950 and 1965, the federal government spent Swagatalakshmi 12 26 Nov 2006, 19:19
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Government representative: Between 1996 and 2005, the gray

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.