Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) - Page 2
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 24 Jan 2017, 04:51

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 23 Jan 2012
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Oct 2012, 07:56
+1 for A

VP
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1420
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
Followers: 176

Kudos [?]: 1339 [0], given: 62

Re: Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Oct 2012, 00:43
I did the question in 1.22 and selected A as the answer. But when C starts blinking, then I started questioning my reasoning skills. After going through the posts, in search of the OE, finally I realised I am not the lonely soul.
No kidding, but seriously this one is a terrible question.
Has to be A.
_________________
Director
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 916
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 696 [0], given: 322

Re: Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jan 2013, 22:30
Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of stem cell research American
companies can conduct. Because of these restrictions, many American scientists who
specialize in the field of stem cell research have signed long-term contracts to work for
foreign companies
. Recently, Congress has proposed lifting all restrictions on stem cell
research. Which of the following conclusions can most properly be inferred from the
information above?
A) At least some foreign companies that conduct stem cell research work under fewer
restrictions than some American companies do. (Already stated in premise and RED in Color above , had there been equal restrictions in foreign companies the scientists wouldn't have moved in the first place.)
b) Because American scientists are under long-term contracts to foreign companies, there will
be a significant influx of foreign professionals into the United States.
c) In all parts of the world, stem cell research is dependent on the financial backing of local
government.
d) In the near future, American companies will no longer be at the forefront of stem cell
research.
e) If restrictions on stem cell research are lifted, many of the American scientists will break

E- Conclusion / As stated in RED that because of restrictions only,american scientists turned to foreign cos.
_________________

Rgds,
TGC!
_____________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
_____________________________________________________________________________

Manager
Joined: 04 Sep 2012
Posts: 144
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 27

Re: Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jan 2013, 16:06
Its between A and E only ,
e sounded bit extreme to me, - as researchers are getting some thing more attractive in foreign countries they will still not come back so chosen A.

But still not clear after reading the comments what is the OA.

But I am happy to be not walking alone here
_________________

Regards,
Abhinav

GMAT 1 - 580 (Q47 V23) http://gmatclub.com/forum/a-tight-slap-on-face-149457.html

GMAT 2 - 670 (Q48 V34) http://gmatclub.com/forum/670-one-month-off-from-office-and-2-months-hard-work-163761.html#p1297561

Intern
Joined: 13 Mar 2011
Posts: 10
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 4

Re: Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jan 2013, 21:33
Marcab wrote:
I did the question in 1.22 and selected A as the answer. But when C starts blinking, then I started questioning my reasoning skills. After going through the posts, in search of the OE, finally I realised I am not the lonely soul.
No kidding, but seriously this one is a terrible question.
Has to be A.

Same here Marcab, the blinking of C got me worried too!

it has to be A
_________________

Manager
Joined: 09 May 2013
Posts: 57
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 12

Re: Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jun 2013, 03:52
A
E can't because if they are good incentive and all they might not come back so these option is not "Must be true"

Posted from my mobile device
BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Posts: 1445
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
GMAT 3: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.35
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Followers: 301

Kudos [?]: 1246 [0], given: 816

Re: Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jun 2013, 07:50
Under no circumstances can the answer to this question be anything but A
_________________

ISB Preparation Kit | GMAT Debrief

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Manager
Joined: 14 Nov 2011
Posts: 149
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.61
WE: Consulting (Manufacturing)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 103

Re: Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jun 2013, 19:10
GetThisDone wrote:
Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of stem cell research American
companies can conduct. Because of these restrictions, many American scientists who
specialize in the field of stem cell research have signed long-term contracts to work for
foreign companies. Recently, Congress has proposed lifting all restrictions on stem cell
research. Which of the following conclusions can most properly be inferred from the
information above?
A) At least some foreign companies that conduct stem cell research work under fewer
restrictions than some American companies do.
b) Because American scientists are under long-term contracts to foreign companies, there will
be a significant influx of foreign professionals into the United States.
c) In all parts of the world, stem cell research is dependent on the financial backing of local
government.
d) In the near future, American companies will no longer be at the forefront of stem cell
research.
e) If restrictions on stem cell research are lifted, many of the American scientists will break

Hi,

Still no clear explanation for the OA (C). Can experts help?

My thinking - scientists changed their jobs/left US companies because they stem cell research was severely limited due to restrictions - basically they could not do the work they wanted to do in American companies.

A - Now, as long as they are able to the work they want to do, in non-American companies they will switch jobs. These non-American companies might or might not have more restrictions than American companies.
Also we do not know what type of restrictions we are talking about here. May be American companies denied completely the research on topic X, but the research on X, can be done in a non-American company. May be this non-American company has some restriction on funding..but still atleast research could be done there.
So the scientist will still have a motive to switch jobs.

Can someone explain C ?
Intern
Joined: 13 May 2013
Posts: 42
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 18

Re: Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jun 2013, 20:27
C is clearly wrong. C is jumping to the conclusion that since companies is the US are dependent on financial backing from their government than this is true for all parts of the world. It doesn't explicitly say this is true of US companies, but it is arguably common knowledge is the US. Also, anytime an answer choice says all it's probably going to be wrong. Do you see anything in the passage that leads to the conclusion that all parts of the world are dependent on financial backing from their local government? The passage doesn't even say anything about funding in other countries.
Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2012
Posts: 60
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 29

Re: Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jun 2013, 06:53
Well for the starters the answer cannot be A for the following reason:

At least some foreign companies that conduct stem cell research work under fewer
restrictions than some American companies do.

This implies that some American companies have similar restrictions as some foreign companies. It cannot be A for sure. Just one word (some) provides a nuance to the argument. If some did not exist, A would have been the best answer.

As far as C is concerned, I do not like it at all as it seems to be out of scope. But that is the OA.
Intern
Joined: 08 Nov 2012
Posts: 33
Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
GMAT 2: Q V
GMAT 3: Q V
GMAT 4: Q V
GPA: 3.7
WE: Business Development (Internet and New Media)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 18

Re: Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jun 2013, 23:08
The answer is clearly A. If scientists go to foreign companies then it means that restrictions there are not so severe. This is what A states.
Intern
Joined: 08 Nov 2012
Posts: 33
Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
GMAT 2: Q V
GMAT 3: Q V
GMAT 4: Q V
GPA: 3.7
WE: Business Development (Internet and New Media)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 18

Re: Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jun 2013, 23:12
targetgmatchotu wrote:
Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of stem cell research American
companies can conduct. Because of these restrictions, many American scientists who
specialize in the field of stem cell research have signed long-term contracts to work for
foreign companies
. Recently, Congress has proposed lifting all restrictions on stem cell
research. Which of the following conclusions can most properly be inferred from the
information above?
A) At least some foreign companies that conduct stem cell research work under fewer
restrictions than some American companies do. (Already stated in premise and RED in Color above , had there been equal restrictions in foreign companies the scientists wouldn't have moved in the first place.)
b) Because American scientists are under long-term contracts to foreign companies, there will
be a significant influx of foreign professionals into the United States.
c) In all parts of the world, stem cell research is dependent on the financial backing of local
government.
d) In the near future, American companies will no longer be at the forefront of stem cell
research.
e) If restrictions on stem cell research are lifted, many of the American scientists will break

E- Conclusion / As stated in RED that because of restrictions only,american scientists turned to foreign cos.

This is the inference question and hence it MUST pass the FACT TEST. The only answer that passes this test is A. E fails this test since there is nothing in the argument that mentions breaking the contracts.
Hope it helps.
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7131
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 2140

Kudos [?]: 13710 [0], given: 222

Re: Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Jun 2013, 19:53
GetThisDone wrote:
Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of stem cell research American
companies can conduct. Because of these restrictions, many American scientists who
specialize in the field of stem cell research have signed long-term contracts to work for
foreign companies. Recently, Congress has proposed lifting all restrictions on stem cell
research. Which of the following conclusions can most properly be inferred from the
information above?
A) At least some foreign companies that conduct stem cell research work under fewer
restrictions than some American companies do.
b) Because American scientists are under long-term contracts to foreign companies, there will
be a significant influx of foreign professionals into the United States.
c) In all parts of the world, stem cell research is dependent on the financial backing of local
government.
d) In the near future, American companies will no longer be at the forefront of stem cell
research.
e) If restrictions on stem cell research are lifted, many of the American scientists will break

The only thing wrong with this question is the given OA. Otherwise the question is very clear cut.

You need to find the conclusion. Look at the first two sentences of the argument:

Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of stem cell research American
companies can conduct. Because of these restrictions, many American scientists who
specialize in the field of stem cell research have signed long-term contracts to work for
foreign companies.

American companies have severe restrictions. Because of these restrictions, American scientists are signing contracts with foreign companies. We can conclude that some foreign companies do not have such severe limitations otherwise it doesn't make sense that american scientists are signing contracts with foreign companies because of these restrictions. Note that right now, congress has only proposed lifting all restrictions. The restrictions haven't been lifted yet and we don't know whether they will be lifted. It's just a proposal. Hence we cannot say that there are no restrictions in America. Still there are severe restrictions as mentioned in the
first sentence.

(C) - Financial backing is not even mentioned in the argument. 'Severe restrictions' could be any kind of restrictions - laws not allowing certain experiments etc. Also, where does the argument tell us that it is dependent on financial backing of local govt in ALL parts of the world?

(D) - We cannot conclude what will happen in the future. Since congress has proposed lifting all restrictions, if these restrictions do get lifted, American companies could still be at the forefront. Perhaps enough number of scientists have not left for foreign companies yet and the situation can be salvaged. We don't know. Also, American companies may still be at the forefront while some foreign companies come to the forefront too. The point is, we certainly cannot conclude this from the limited info.

(E) - We cannot conclude that American scientists will break their contracts. Perhaps the restrictions are being lifted so that more scientists do not sign contracts with foreign companies.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for \$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Mar 2012
Posts: 374
Schools: Schulich '16
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 4

Re: Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2013, 21:05
+1 A.

C would be my first choice to eliminate...as the passage doesnt suggest the given inf.

IRRELEVANT/

This is an INFERENCE question and the answer choice should comw solely from the argument.No outside inf.
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 3716
Followers: 1299

Kudos [?]: 5863 [0], given: 66

Re: Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2013, 12:45
I edited the question at the head of this post, correcting the OA. Clearly (A) is the correct OA, so I made that change.
Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10543
Followers: 920

Kudos [?]: 204 [0], given: 0

Re: Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2015, 07:19
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of   [#permalink] 27 Jan 2015, 07:19

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 36 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
8 Inference Revision: Government restrictions have severely limited 4 14 Feb 2015, 01:56
3 In several cities, the government is going ahead with 7 02 Oct 2012, 09:23
5 In several cities, the government is going ahead with 19 02 Apr 2010, 05:17
The more safety restrictions the government puts on 10 30 Nov 2008, 10:30
In several cities, the government is going ahead with 4 28 Dec 2007, 10:10
Display posts from previous: Sort by