Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 01 Nov 2014, 03:09

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 23 Oct 2011
Posts: 286
Followers: 27

Kudos [?]: 378 [1] , given: 19

Premium Member
Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of [#permalink] New post 28 Apr 2012, 18:50
1
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

62% (02:07) correct 38% (01:04) wrong based on 413 sessions
Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of stem cell research American
companies can conduct. Because of these restrictions, many American scientists who
specialize in the field of stem cell research have signed long-term contracts to work for
foreign companies. Recently, Congress has proposed lifting all restrictions on stem cell
research. Which of the following conclusions can most properly be inferred from the
information above?
A) At least some foreign companies that conduct stem cell research work under fewer
restrictions than some American companies do.
b) Because American scientists are under long-term contracts to foreign companies, there will
be a significant influx of foreign professionals into the United States.
c) In all parts of the world, stem cell research is dependent on the financial backing of local
government.
d) In the near future, American companies will no longer be at the forefront of stem cell
research.
e) If restrictions on stem cell research are lifted, many of the American scientists will break
their contracts to return to American companies.




Main CR Qs link - Main link - cr-qs-600-700-level-131508.html
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

********************
Push +1 kudos button please, if you like my post.

Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesKnewton GMAT Discount CodesGMAT Pill GMAT Discount Codes
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 Dec 2010
Posts: 17
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Conclusion - # 3 [#permalink] New post 09 May 2012, 14:21
Quote:
Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of stem cell research American
companies can conduct. Because of these restrictions, many American scientists who
specialize in the field of stem cell research have signed long-term contracts to work for
foreign companies. Recently, Congress has proposed lifting all restrictions on stem cell
research. Which of the following conclusions can most properly be inferred from the
information above?
A) At least some foreign companies that conduct stem cell research work under fewer
restrictions than some American companies do.
b) Because American scientists are under long-term contracts to foreign companies, there will
be a significant influx of foreign professionals into the United States.
c) In all parts of the world, stem cell research is dependent on the financial backing of local
government.
d) In the near future, American companies will no longer be at the forefront of stem cell
research.
e) If restrictions on stem cell research are lifted, many of the American scientists will break
their contracts to return to American companies.


The answer should not be C. IMO, it is almost certainly that OA is A. If american scientist signed with foreign companies because of the restrictions in the US, then it is implied that foreign companies have fewer restrictions.

No where does it say anything about backing, let alone financial government backing.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Feb 2012
Posts: 115
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 600 Q49 V23
GPA: 3.8
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 15

Re: CR - Conclusion - # 3 [#permalink] New post 10 May 2012, 08:38
mohankumarbd wrote:
Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of stem cell research American
companies can conduct. Because of these restrictions, many American scientists who
specialize in the field of stem cell research have signed long-term contracts to work for
foreign companies. Recently, Congress has proposed lifting all restrictions on stem cell
research. Which of the following conclusions can most properly be inferred from the
information above?
A) At least some foreign companies that conduct stem cell research work under fewer
restrictions than some American companies do.
b) Because American scientists are under long-term contracts to foreign companies, there will
be a significant influx of foreign professionals into the United States.
c) In all parts of the world, stem cell research is dependent on the financial backing of local
government.
d) In the near future, American companies will no longer be at the forefront of stem cell
research.
e) If restrictions on stem cell research are lifted, many of the American scientists will break
their contracts to return to American companies.




Main CR Qs link - Main link - cr-qs-600-700-level-131508.html





The answer to this one should be a D. C has nothing to do with the research.
Please give OA and OE.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Dec 2011
Posts: 82
Location: Canada
Concentration: Accounting, Finance
GMAT Date: 09-08-2012
GPA: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 2

Reviews Badge
Re: CR - Conclusion - # 3 [#permalink] New post 11 May 2012, 11:36
mohankumarbd wrote:
Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of stem cell research American
companies can conduct. Conclusion Because of these restrictions, many American scientists who
specialize in the field of stem cell research have signed long-term contracts to work for
foreign companies.
Conclusion Recently, Congress has proposed lifting all restrictions on stem cell
research.

Which of the following conclusions can most properly be inferred from the
information above?


A) At least some foreign companies that conduct stem cell research work under fewer
restrictions than some American companies do. Relates to conclusion and states facts that we know are true.

b) Because American scientists are under long-term contracts to foreign companies, there will
be a significant influx of foreign professionals into the United States. Deceptive answer, but we do not know this to be true, some could break there contracts.

c) In all parts of the world, stem cell research is dependent on the financial backing of local
government. Nothing to do with financing is stated, irrelevant!

d) In the near future, American companies will no longer be at the forefront of stem cell
research. Does not say this, they could or could not.

e) If restrictions on stem cell research are lifted, many of the American scientists will break
their contracts to return to American companies. Does not say this, could or could not happen.

Main CR Qs link - Main link - cr-qs-600-700-level-131508.html


+1 A.

Please check your source on this one, I have found the answer to be A. http://gmat-cr.blogspot.ca/2009/07/conc ... s-and.html
_________________

Thanks = +1 Kudos

Study from reliable sources!!

Thursdays with Ron: http://www.manhattangmat.com/thursdays-with-ron.cfm

Gmat Prep Questions:
CR gmatprepsc-105446.html
SC gmatprepsc-105446.html

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Apr 2011
Posts: 224
Schools: Mccombs business school, Mays business school, Rotman Business School,
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 18

Re: CR - Conclusion - # 3 [#permalink] New post 13 Jun 2012, 00:46
the answer must not be C because it is out of scope. But E is very much tempting. how do i eliminate E here.
_________________

some people are successful, because they have been fortunate enough and some people earn success, because they have been determined.....

please press kudos if you like my post.... i am begging for kudos...lol

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Posts: 129
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 14

Re: CR - Conclusion - # 3 [#permalink] New post 13 Jun 2012, 05:49
mohankumarbd wrote:
Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of stem cell research American
companies can conduct. Because of these restrictions, many American scientists who
specialize in the field of stem cell research have signed long-term contracts to work for
foreign companies. Recently, Congress has proposed lifting all restrictions on stem cell
research. Which of the following conclusions can most properly be inferred from the
information above?
A) At least some foreign companies that conduct stem cell research work under fewer
restrictions than some American companies do.
b) Because American scientists are under long-term contracts to foreign companies, there will
be a significant influx of foreign professionals into the United States.
c) In all parts of the world, stem cell research is dependent on the financial backing of local
government.
d) In the near future, American companies will no longer be at the forefront of stem cell
research.
e) If restrictions on stem cell research are lifted, many of the American scientists will break
their contracts to return to American companies.




Main CR Qs link - Main link - cr-qs-600-700-level-131508.html


In GMAT, you always look for the best answer. And the best way to find the best answer is by elimination.

A. There is no mention or reference of "some" companies having restrictions. So this choice is eliminated.
B. Based on the given information, there is no mention of immigration being dependent on research restriction. So B is eliminated.
C. What is the restriction in the form of? It does not look like the companies need permission from the government to continue research. It's only funding that is required. So maybe the American companies depend on government funding to continue research. This looks probable. We'll come back to it.
D. It is not said whether American companies "are" at the forefront of stem cell research.
E. This sounds probable, but not as a conclusion/inference, but an assumption. This is the most probable assumption taken by the government.

Hence the best choice is C.
_________________

Shouvik
http://www.Edvento.com
admin@edvento.com

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 171
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT Date: 07-23-2012
WE: Programming (Telecommunications)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 4

Re: CR - Conclusion - # 3 [#permalink] New post 13 Jun 2012, 07:43
+1 for A. Please provide OA.

A is correct since scientist are making contracts in other countries so there must be some countries which are not restricted to do the research.
E is not mentioned or cannot be deduced from the sentence.
_________________

FOCUS..this is all I need!

Ku-Do!

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 Jan 2012
Posts: 303
Weight: 170lbs
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V42
GMAT 2: 740 Q48 V42
WE: Analyst (Other)
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 37

Re: CR - Conclusion - # 3 [#permalink] New post 13 Jun 2012, 08:18
A - Yes, this is somewhat reasonable to infer. It's definitely not perfect, though.
B - Not really. Don't see how this is related at all.
C - Not really. This passage doesn't mention financial backing at all. The only way that this is possible is if the reader is supposed to know that research industries are generally funded largely in part by federal grants. The usage of "restrictions" here certainly implies regulations as opposed to "restrictions [in funding]".
D - Not really. Are they even at the forefront now?
E - Not really. Certainly could be possible, but we can't infer it from the passage.

A it is.

If C is really the OA, then I place my vote in the this-is-a-terrible-question hat. What's the source and real OA?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 May 2012
Posts: 83
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 650 Q51 V25
GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V38
GMAT 3: Q V
GPA: 4
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 14

Re: CR - Conclusion - # 3 [#permalink] New post 13 Jun 2012, 09:10
mohankumarbd wrote:
Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of stem cell research American
companies can conduct. Because of these restrictions, many American scientists who
specialize in the field of stem cell research have signed long-term contracts to work for
foreign companies. Recently, Congress has proposed lifting all restrictions on stem cell
research. Which of the following conclusions can most properly be inferred from the
information above?
A) At least some foreign companies that conduct stem cell research work under fewer
restrictions than some American companies do.
b) Because American scientists are under long-term contracts to foreign companies, there will
be a significant influx of foreign professionals into the United States.
c) In all parts of the world, stem cell research is dependent on the financial backing of local
government.
d) In the near future, American companies will no longer be at the forefront of stem cell
research.
e) If restrictions on stem cell research are lifted, many of the American scientists will break
their contracts to return to American companies.




Main CR Qs link - Main link - cr-qs-600-700-level-131508.html


+1 for A

B, C, D are all out of scope.
E is tempting, but again not certain.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 818
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
Schools: Ross '17, Duke '17
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 44

Kudos [?]: 246 [0], given: 43

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: CR - Conclusion - # 3 [#permalink] New post 14 Jun 2012, 00:47
This is tough and terrible question. It cannot be C as the OA.
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you :)

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 03 Aug 2011
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of [#permalink] New post 16 Jul 2012, 20:34
A :P
Director
Director
User avatar
Status: Final Countdown
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 564
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 75

Re: Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of [#permalink] New post 16 Jul 2012, 23:59
A) At least some foreign companies that conduct stem cell research work under fewer
restrictions than some American companies do.

*SOUNDS GOOD -HOLD

b) Because American scientists are under long-term contracts to foreign companies, there will
be a significant influx of foreign professionals into the United States.

*What if the restriction is in US based company but the research is in other countries?the influx of scientist may go to other countries where the US based companies are located.

* Foreign professionals may or may not come, but the issue raised is for the american scientists only, we can se it in the passage as "......Because of these restrictions, many American scientists who
specialize in the field of stem cell research have signed long-term contracts...."


c) In all parts of the world, stem cell research is dependent on the financial backing of local
government.

*America is not a part of the world?

*Financial backing is not mentioned anywhere, "restrictions"are mentioned that can be for any type, financial or moral or anything else... may be the research is been funded/proposed/encouraged by the Anthropological or pharmaceutical association of a country !!!
Restrictions was there which may be because of the anticipation illegal business involved for a particular time horizon!!

d) In the near future, American companies will no longer be at the forefront of stem cell
research.

*Near future will be bright anyways once the restrictions will be over.

e) If restrictions on stem cell research are lifted, many of the American scientists will break
their contracts to return to American companies.

Sounds a little extreme, but if possible for the scientists they will surely would not mind breaking their agreement because they left US companies ONLY when there were restrictions.

(E) wins.
_________________

" Make more efforts "
Press Kudos if you liked my post

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Posts: 30
Location: Venezuela
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 24 [1] , given: 5

Re: Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of [#permalink] New post 17 Jul 2012, 07:17
1
This post received
KUDOS
In this argument, a cause-and-effect relationship is presented between American scientists signing long-term contracts with foreign companies and the government's restrictions on stem cell research. This cause-and-effect relationship is the key to the correct answer.

(A) CORRECT. If American scientists signed the contracts because of U.S. restrictions, we can infer that the new companies they signed with were under fewer restrictions. Therefore, at least some foreign companies must work under fewer restrictions than some American companies do.

(B) While it is possible that once the restrictions are banned American companies will want to hire more scientists and will seek them overseas, there are too many unknowns between the premises we have have been given and this conclusion. It is doubtful that an increase in the number of immigrating stem cell research scientists would have a significant impact on the number of foreign professionals overall.

(C) This passage is about government restrictions; we are given no information about financial backing. Beware of extreme statements such as in all parts of the world.

(D) We are not given any information regarding America's current or future position in terms of stem cell research. Though restrictions and scientists switching companies are two issues related to a company's prosperity, we are given no information about how these directly affect America's position.

(E) We are not given any information that will help us predict the behavior of the scientists in the future.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Posts: 459
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 5

Re: Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of [#permalink] New post 17 Jul 2012, 07:41
+ 1 A

From all the above options, A is the strongest one but I'm still confused how to eliminate option C.
_________________

GGG (Gym / GMAT / Girl) -- Be Serious

Its your duty to post OA afterwards; some one must be waiting for that...

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 Aug 2012
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 3

Re: Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of [#permalink] New post 10 Sep 2012, 07:41
This is from the Manhattan CR Guide 4th Edition.
Official Answer is A, explanations are the same posted above by santivilla.

A though doesn't make sense to me.

At least some foreign companies that conduct stem cell research work under fewer
restrictions than SOME American companies do.


Why some? The government put a restricition, therefore ALL American companies should be affected by the same exact restrictive measure not just some of them. Otherwise scientists would go to those American companies without said restrictions and not all the way to Europe.

My answer would be D but it's deeply flawed too. Definitely an horrible question.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 06 Oct 2009
Posts: 98
Location: Mexico
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
GMAT 1: 610 Q42 V34
GPA: 3.85
WE: Sales (Commercial Banking)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 3

Re: Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of [#permalink] New post 10 Sep 2012, 20:40
IMO A

As the foreign companies are the ones hiring long term, they must have some sort of advantage Vs local companies.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1726
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 68

Kudos [?]: 341 [0], given: 109

Re: Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of [#permalink] New post 10 Sep 2012, 22:11
+1 A

If the foreign companies have the same number of restrictions, or less, the scientis wouldn't want to work in those companies. Those companies wouldn't have something attractive for the scientists.
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Apr 2012
Posts: 28
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 8

Re: Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of [#permalink] New post 11 Sep 2012, 02:57
Why A? In the text it is stated, that all restrictions were left so they work under the same conditions.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2012
Posts: 43
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 36

Re: Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of [#permalink] New post 11 Sep 2012, 06:46
The answer is clearly A. It still leaves some probability by using 'some'.

c is wrong as it uses 'all countries', which is a very strong statement.
_________________

If you think you are lost, you are.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2011
Posts: 21
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT Date: 09-14-2012
GRE 1: 1330 Q720 V610
WE: Information Technology (Other)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 6

Re: Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of [#permalink] New post 11 Sep 2012, 10:15
so when the argument says " Recently, Congress has proposed lifting all restrictions on stem cell research."
it now means there are no restrictions on American companies and thus how can foreign companies have lower restrictions than no restrictions :shock:

this is one thing which i think went against A.
_________________

Everybody says I'm Fine!

Re: Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of   [#permalink] 11 Sep 2012, 10:15
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
The more safety restrictions the government puts on twilight 10 30 Nov 2008, 10:30
The fewer government restrictions there are on advertising a GMATT73 8 02 Nov 2005, 23:42
In several cities, the government is going ahead with rahulraao 16 04 Oct 2005, 17:03
The fewer government restrictions there are on advertising a GMATT73 4 28 Sep 2005, 05:39
In several cities, the government is going ahead with christoph 9 14 Feb 2005, 13:32
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 35 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.