Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 24 Aug 2016, 06:04

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Governments have only one response to public criticism of

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 428
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 291 [1] , given: 14

Governments have only one response to public criticism of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Nov 2009, 07:38
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

83% (02:21) correct 17% (01:21) wrong based on 70 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Governments have only one response to public criticism of socially necessary services: regulation of the activity of providing those services. But governments inevitably make the activity more expensive by regulating it, and that is particularly troublesome in these times of strained financial resources. However, since public criticism of child-care services has undermined all confidence in such services, and since such services are socially necessary, the government is certain to respond.

Which one of the following statements can be inferred from the passage?
(A) The quality of child care will improve.
(B) The cost of providing child-care services will increase.
(C) The government will use funding to foster advances in child care.
(D) If public criticism of policy is strongly voiced, the government is certain to respond.
(E) If child-care services are not regulated, the cost of providing child care will not increase.
Director
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 914
Followers: 65

Kudos [?]: 478 [0], given: 17

Re: Government & Public criticisim [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Nov 2009, 08:19
LSAT stuff
I tried,took more than 2 mins but got the right answer
later i saw the OE

its a typical If-Then structure
IMO B
public criticism -->more regulation -->More expensive
see Pg 320 below at url.

gurpreet07 wrote:
Governments have only one response to public criticism of socially necessary services: regulation of the activity of providing those services. But governments inevitably make the activity more expensive by regulating it, and that is particularly troublesome in these times of strained financial resources. However, since public criticism of child-care services has undermined all confidence in such services, and since such services are socially necessary, the government is certain to respond.

Which one of the following statements can be inferred from the passage?
(A) The quality of child care will improve.
(B) The cost of providing child-care services will increase.
(C) The government will use funding to foster advances in child care.
(D) If public criticism of policy is strongly voiced, the government is certain to respond.
(E) If child-care services are not regulated, the cost of providing child care will not increase.

_________________

http://gmatclub.com/forum/math-polygons-87336.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/competition-for-the-best-gmat-error-log-template-86232.html

Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 428
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 291 [0], given: 14

Re: Government & Public criticisim [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Nov 2009, 09:02
nitya34 wrote:
LSAT stuff
I tried,took more than 2 mins but got the right answer
later i saw the OE

its a typical If-Then structure
IMO B
public criticism -->more regulation -->More expensive
see Pg 320 below at url.

gurpreet07 wrote:
Governments have only one response to public criticism of socially necessary services: regulation of the activity of providing those services. But governments inevitably make the activity more expensive by regulating it, and that is particularly troublesome in these times of strained financial resources. However, since public criticism of child-care services has undermined all confidence in such services, and since such services are socially necessary, the government is certain to respond.

Which one of the following statements can be inferred from the passage?
(A) The quality of child care will improve.
(B) The cost of providing child-care services will increase.
(C) The government will use funding to foster advances in child care.
(D) If public criticism of policy is strongly voiced, the government is certain to respond.
(E) If child-care services are not regulated, the cost of providing child care will not increase.

Even i got it right first time...but i used intuition and POE
Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 435
Schools: UT at Austin, Indiana State University, UC at Berkeley
WE 1: 5.5
WE 2: 5.5
WE 3: 6.0
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 110 [0], given: 16

Re: Government & Public criticisim [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Nov 2009, 14:38
IMO B for sure...
_________________

Never give up,,,

Manager
Joined: 24 Sep 2009
Posts: 111
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 2

Re: Government & Public criticisim [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Nov 2009, 19:37
gurpreet07 wrote:
Governments have only one response to public criticism of socially necessary services: regulation of the activity of providing those services. But governments inevitably make the activity more expensive by regulating it, and that is particularly troublesome in these times of strained financial resources. However, since public criticism of child-care services has undermined all confidence in such services, and since such services are socially necessary, the government is certain to respond.

Which one of the following statements can be inferred from the passage?
(A) The quality of child care will improve.
(B) The cost of providing child-care services will increase.
(C) The government will use funding to foster advances in child care.
(D) If public criticism of policy is strongly voiced, the government is certain to respond.
(E) If child-care services are not regulated, the cost of providing child care will not increase.

B.
G"overnments inevitably make the activity more expensive by regulating it", then childcare cost surely increases.
Then B.
_________________

http://www.online-stopwatch.com/
http://gmatsentencecorrection.blogspot.com/

Intern
Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Posts: 41
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 15

Re: Governments have only one response to public criticism of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Sep 2012, 02:38
Why E can't be answer ?
Intern
Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Posts: 41
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 15

Re: Governments have only one response to public criticism of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Sep 2012, 02:38
Why E can't be answer ?
Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Posts: 464
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GMAT 1: Q V0
GPA: 3.23
Followers: 25

Kudos [?]: 384 [0], given: 11

Re: Governments have only one response to public criticism of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jan 2013, 00:48
smartmanav wrote:
Why E can't be answer ?

It cannot be E because the stimulus did not say: It is ONLY through regulation that the cost will increase. There could be external factors that could also cause the cost to increase. Even if regulation does not happen, cost may still increase for other reasons.
_________________

Impossible is nothing to God.

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 3301
Followers: 1121

Kudos [?]: 4917 [1] , given: 54

Re: Governments have only one response to public criticism of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jan 2013, 13:14
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
gurpreet07 wrote:
Governments have only one response to public criticism of socially necessary services: regulation of the activity of providing those services. But governments inevitably make the activity more expensive by regulating it, and that is particularly troublesome in these times of strained financial resources. However, since public criticism of child-care services has undermined all confidence in such services, and since such services are socially necessary, the government is certain to respond.

Which one of the following statements can be inferred from the passage?
(A) The quality of child care will improve.
(B) The cost of providing child-care services will increase.
(C) The government will use funding to foster advances in child care.
(D) If public criticism of policy is strongly voiced, the government is certain to respond.
(E) If child-care services are not regulated, the cost of providing child care will not increase
.

The LSAT arguments are typically harder than GMAT CR arguments, so if you have run out of challenging GMAT CR practice questions, the LSAT questions can be an excellent source of further practice.

This argument is a complex syllogism.
General case: public complains --- government forced to regulate ---- more money spent on the necessary social service.
Then, we apply this general case scenario the specific example of child care
folks are complaining about child care --- the government will have to regulate it --- then it will cost more money to run the child care programs

Now, let's look at the answers:
(A) The quality of child care will improve.
We know that it's quite likely that the government will spend more money on child care to regulate it. Does this necessarily mean that the quality of the child care programs will improve. Perhaps in a magical fairyland, anything at which the government throws money automatically improves, but in the real world, there are oh-so-many examples of the best intentions of government spending going astray, and programs not improving despite increased spending. It's very helpful to have a real world sense of these things ---- both GMAT CR and LSAT argument questions are consistent with the push & pull of real world forces.
(A) is incorrect.

(B) The cost of providing child-care services will increase.
This is the direct result of the parallel logic. Notice --- we don't know to whom the costs increase: will that increased cost be paid by the parents who want childcare, or by the government (i.e. by all taxpayers)? We don't know, but this is irrelevant. Regardless of who pays, the cost will be increased. (B) is a promising and plausible answer.

(C) The government will use funding to foster advances in child care.
Similar to (A). Yes, the government is going to through money at the programs in the form of regulating it, but will these regulations produce radically improved programs? Of course, that's the idealized hope, but there's no guarantee that this will be the outcome.
(D) is incorrect.

(D) If public criticism of policy is strongly voiced, the government is certain to respond.
Very tricky. This passage is very specifically about "socially necessary services". The government funds a whole bunch of things that are not in the category of socially necessary services (the arts, environmental protection, diplomacy & foreign aid, etc. etc.) Will the government respond to strong criticism about any of these? We don't know. It's well outside the scope of this argument.
(D) is incorrect.

(E) If child-care services are not regulated, the cost of providing child care will not increase
This is the one about which smartmanav asked. Technically, this answer choice is relying on a logical mistake known as the equivalence of a conditional statement and its inverse. In formal language, the mistake is
Starting with (if P, then Q), we conclude (if not P, then not Q).
This is a logical fallacy.
Consider these examples:
Original: If I am in the SF Bay Area, then I am in California. True
Inverse: If I am not in the SF Bay Area, then I am not in California. False --- I could be in LA or San Diego or Tahoe or Yosemite or etc. California is a big state!

Original: If a shape is a square, then it is a quadrilateral. True
Inverse: If a shape is not a square, then it is not a quadrilateral. False --- it could be a trapezoid, a slanted rhombus, an elongated rectangle, etc. etc.

The argument makes the case that
If government regulates, then costs increase.
For the purposes of this question, we have to accept the prompt evidence as true.
Essentially, answer choice (E) leaps from here to the inverse:
If government does not regulate, then costs will not increase.
If the government does not regular child care, that particular source of cost increase is eliminated, but that is certainly not a guarantee that nothing else at all will cause the price to increase. There could be a labor dispute, lawsuits from parents, insurance increases, etc. etc. --- any one of a thousand other things that could cause the price of child care to increase. We don't have a guarantee that the cost of child care will increase, but we certainly can't conclude definitively that the cost won't increase. The truth is: if the government does not regular child care, we have absolutely no idea whether the cost of child care will increase or not. We can draw no conclusion. We have absolutely no grounds for concluding the inverse from the original conditional statement ---- this is a fundamental logical fallacy.
(E) is incorrect.

The only possible answer is (B).

Does all of this make sense?

Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Intern
Joined: 15 May 2014
Posts: 25
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 22

Re: Governments have only one response to public criticism of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Sep 2014, 06:46
gurpreet07 wrote:
Governments have only one response to public criticism of socially necessary services: regulation of the activity of providing those services. But governments inevitably make the activity more expensive by regulating it, and that is particularly troublesome in these times of strained financial resources. However, since public criticism of child-care services has undermined all confidence in such services, and since such services are socially necessary, the government is certain to respond.

Which one of the following statements can be inferred from the passage?
(A) The quality of child care will improve.
(B) The cost of providing child-care services will increase.
(C) The government will use funding to foster advances in child care.
(D) If public criticism of policy is strongly voiced, the government is certain to respond.
(E) If child-care services are not regulated, the cost of providing child care will not increase.

I got the question wrong at first too, however, I realized where I went wrong. Here's why B should be the answer:

1. Governments, when called into action regarding any public criticism, they enforce regulation
2. Government regulations make the activity more expensive
3. Child-care services has received public criticism
4. Therefore, government will respond by enforcing regulation (as this is the "Only" thing they do according to the argument)
5. Since whenever government regulates, the service gets more expensive, it is expected that the cost of providing child-care service will increase as well.
Re: Governments have only one response to public criticism of   [#permalink] 30 Sep 2014, 06:46
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
7 *70* Governments have only one response to public criticism 3 17 Apr 2015, 10:30
Governments have only one response to public criticism of 11 05 Jul 2011, 09:18
Governments have only one response to public criticism of 2 13 May 2011, 00:21
2 Governments have only one response to public criticism of 14 28 May 2010, 08:03
Recently, many critics of the U.S. government have pointed 9 31 Aug 2006, 08:57
Display posts from previous: Sort by