Grockit CR Although only 2 percent of drivers on Lalaland s : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 07 Dec 2016, 11:41

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Grockit CR Although only 2 percent of drivers on Lalaland s

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 18 Sep 2011
Posts: 13
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 59 [2] , given: 5

Grockit CR Although only 2 percent of drivers on Lalaland s [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Oct 2012, 10:36
2
KUDOS
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

85% (hard)

Question Stats:

46% (02:49) correct 54% (01:48) wrong based on 279 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Grockit CR

Although only 2 percent of drivers on Lalaland’s highways drove sports cars, 25 percent of all vehicles ticketed for drunk driving in the past 90 days were sports cars. Clearly, sports car drivers on Lalaland highways are more likely to drive drunk than are drivers of other kinds of vehicles.
The conclusion drawn above depends on which of the following assumptions?

A. Drivers on Lalaland highways drive drunk more often than do drivers on highways not covered in the report.
B. Many of the vehicles ticketed for drunk driving were ticketed more than once during the time period covered by the report.
C. Drivers who are ticketed for drunk driving are more likely to drive drunk regularly than are drivers who are not ticketed.
D. The number of drivers ticketed for drunk driving was greater than the number of sportscars.
E. Drivers of sports cars are less likely to be ticketed for drunk driving than are drivers of other kinds of cars.

Got stumped on this one.. basically, misinterpreted the conclusion.
Instead of "Clearly, sports car drivers on Lalaland highways are more likely to drive drunk than are drivers of other kinds of vehicles" I went on with something like "Clearly, it is more likely that sports car drivers (than the drivers of other kinds of vehicles on Lalaland highways) drive drunk."

After reading the explanation (This argument makes the connection between the likelihood of driving drunk and the kind of car one drives. The unstated assumption is that those who are ticketed drive drunk more often than those who are not ticketed.) the argument and assumption appear pretty straight forward and so does the OA

I am just wondering isn't the line of thought/conclusion that I took more natural/real world.
Isn't the actual conclusion tad artificial and "logic for logic's sake" kind?
Can someone throw an OG question with similar line of tought/argument.

Many thanks | Supratim Choudhury
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Jun 2010
Posts: 368
Schools: IE'14, ISB'14, Kellogg'15
WE 1: 7 Yrs in Automobile (Commercial Vehicle industry)
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 366 [2] , given: 50

Re: Grockit CR-Although only 2 percent of drivers... [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Oct 2012, 19:07
2
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
supratim7 wrote:
Grockit CR

Although only 2 percent of drivers on Lalaland’s highways drove sports cars, 25 percent of all vehicles ticketed for drunk driving in the past 90 days were sports cars. Clearly, sports car drivers on Lalaland highways are more likely to drive drunk than are drivers of other kinds of vehicles.
The conclusion drawn above depends on which of the following assumptions?

A. Drivers on Lalaland highways drive drunk more often than do drivers on highways not covered in the report.
B. Many of the vehicles ticketed for drunk driving were ticketed more than once during the time period covered by the report.
C. Drivers who are ticketed for drunk driving are more likely to drive drunk regularly than are drivers who are not ticketed.
D. The number of drivers ticketed for drunk driving was greater than the number of sportscars.
E. Drivers of sports cars are less likely to be ticketed for drunk driving than are drivers of other kinds of cars.

Got stumped on this one.. basically, misinterpreted the conclusion.
Instead of "Clearly, sports car drivers on Lalaland highways are more likely to drive drunk than are drivers of other kinds of vehicles" I went on with something like "Clearly, it is more likely that sports car drivers (than the drivers of other kinds of vehicles on Lalaland highways) drive drunk."

After reading the explanation (This argument makes the connection between the likelihood of driving drunk and the kind of car one drives. The unstated assumption is that those who are ticketed drive drunk more often than those who are not ticketed.) the argument and assumption appear pretty straight forward and so does the OA

I am just wondering isn't the line of thought/conclusion that I took more natural/real world.
Isn't the actual conclusion tad artificial and "logic for logic's sake" kind?
Can someone throw an OG question with similar line of tought/argument.

Many thanks | Supratim Choudhury

This is an example of Scope shift in the conclusion. The premise is talking about "Vehicles Ticketed for drunk driving" and the conclusion is about "Sports car Driver". So there is a subtle scope shift in the Conclusion. So Option C bridges the logical Gap very well in the argument.

In-fact there is a similar OG question In OG 13, # 77.

A recent report determined that although only 3 percent of drivers on Maryland highways equipped their vehicles with radar detectors, 33 percent of all vehicles ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were equipped with them. Clearly, drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who do not.

The conclusion drawn above depends on which of the following assumptions?
_________________

Regards
SD
-----------------------------
Press Kudos if you like my post.
Debrief 610-540-580-710(Long Journey): http://gmatclub.com/forum/from-600-540-580-710-finally-achieved-in-4th-attempt-142456.html

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10439
Followers: 886

Kudos [?]: 191 [1] , given: 0

Re: Grockit CR Although only 2 percent of drivers on Lalaland s [#permalink]

Show Tags

04 Jul 2014, 01:37
1
KUDOS
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Director
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 568
Schools: Cambridge'16
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 40

Re: Grockit CR Although only 2 percent of drivers on Lalaland s [#permalink]

Show Tags

04 Jul 2014, 23:33
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Premise 1. Drivers-->2% sport car, 98% not sport ones
Premise 2. Ticketed for drunk--->25% sport car drivers, 75% not sport car ones
Conclusion: Sport car drivers are more likely to drive drunk than other drivers

Prethinking:
Ticketing for drunkness is indicator of any drivers to be drunk. i.e. if they drunk they will be ticketed.

Only C responds
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10439
Followers: 886

Kudos [?]: 191 [0], given: 0

Re: Grockit CR Although only 2 percent of drivers on Lalaland s [#permalink]

Show Tags

14 Mar 2016, 18:16
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Grockit CR Although only 2 percent of drivers on Lalaland s   [#permalink] 14 Mar 2016, 18:16
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
A recent report determined that although only 3 percent of drivers on 0 14 Jan 2015, 23:18
20 Although only 2 percent of drivers on Lalaland’s highways 6 24 Jul 2013, 10:39
8 A recent report determined that although only 2 percent of 11 06 Jul 2011, 13:05
A recent report determined that although only three percent 0 13 Dec 2008, 16:36
A recent report determined that although only three percent 0 01 Jan 2007, 22:40
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Grockit CR Although only 2 percent of drivers on Lalaland s

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.