|
Author |
Message |
|
GMAT Club Legend
Affiliations: HHonors Diamond, BGS Honor Society
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 5881
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2009
GMAT 1: 730 Q45 V45
WE: Business Development (Consumer Products)
Followers: 196
Kudos [?]:
1365
[0], given: 7
|
patents555 wrote: The email from the Admissions office indicates that the Admissions office will not give us any advice as to why we were placed on the waitlist.
This is GSB?
Thats kind of surprising.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2006
Posts: 166
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
The email I received from the GSB Admission Committee includes FAQs, including:
Quote: Can I speak with the Admission staff regarding my application?
We do not provide feedback to waitlisted applicants.
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club Legend
Affiliations: HHonors Diamond, BGS Honor Society
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 5881
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2009
GMAT 1: 730 Q45 V45
WE: Business Development (Consumer Products)
Followers: 196
Kudos [?]:
1365
[0], given: 7
|
flapjack wrote: The email I received from the GSB Admission Committee includes FAQs, including: Quote: Can I speak with the Admission staff regarding my application?
We do not provide feedback to waitlisted applicants.
Well thats bullsh1t.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2006
Posts: 166
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
The Admissions Committee used to give feedback - someone I know who applied in 2002 told me this. I'm not sure why they stopped doing so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club Legend
Affiliations: HHonors Diamond, BGS Honor Society
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 5881
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2009
GMAT 1: 730 Q45 V45
WE: Business Development (Consumer Products)
Followers: 196
Kudos [?]:
1365
[0], given: 7
|
flapjack wrote: The Admissions Committee used to give feedback - someone I know who applied in 2002 told me this. I'm not sure why they stopped doing so.
Too much work?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2006
Posts: 166
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
I'm sure it is a lot of work. But I heard that in 2002 there was an incredibly large number of applicants due to the slow economy.
I suspect they aren't giving feedback because they put far more people on the Wait List this year than they did in years past. (I don't really know if that is true - it's just my unsupported hunch.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club Legend
Affiliations: HHonors Diamond, BGS Honor Society
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 5881
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2009
GMAT 1: 730 Q45 V45
WE: Business Development (Consumer Products)
Followers: 196
Kudos [?]:
1365
[0], given: 7
|
flapjack wrote: I'm sure it is a lot of work. But I heard that in 2002 there was an incredibly large number of applicants due to the slow economy.
I suspect they aren't giving feedback because they put far more people on the Wait List this year than they did in years past. (I don't really know if that is true - it's just my unsupported hunch.)
It might be given the rank move. Hedging their bets so to speak.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 23 Oct 2006
Posts: 177
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
rhyme wrote: flapjack wrote: I'm sure it is a lot of work. But I heard that in 2002 there was an incredibly large number of applicants due to the slow economy.
I suspect they aren't giving feedback because they put far more people on the Wait List this year than they did in years past. (I don't really know if that is true - it's just my unsupported hunch.) It might be given the rank move. Hedging their bets so to speak.
Can you explain how putting more people on the waitlist would be hedging their bets?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Apr 2006
Posts: 499
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
7
[0], given: 0
|
Hey Rhyme - congrats on the acceptance - I have been on vacation all week and didnt see you got in - thats great news!
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club Legend
Affiliations: HHonors Diamond, BGS Honor Society
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 5881
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2009
GMAT 1: 730 Q45 V45
WE: Business Development (Consumer Products)
Followers: 196
Kudos [?]:
1365
[0], given: 7
|
homefry wrote: rhyme wrote: flapjack wrote: I'm sure it is a lot of work. But I heard that in 2002 there was an incredibly large number of applicants due to the slow economy.
I suspect they aren't giving feedback because they put far more people on the Wait List this year than they did in years past. (I don't really know if that is true - it's just my unsupported hunch.) It might be given the rank move. Hedging their bets so to speak. Can you explain how putting more people on the waitlist would be hedging their bets?
Well, it would depend on how they view their rank affecting yield this year. In all honesty, its pure conjecture - but it would go something like this -
1. App volume is up: suggests greater interest, possible increase in yield
2. #1 Rank on BW: could substantially increase yield
If yield jumps from say about 50% (an intelligent guess) to 60 or 70% (a total guess) this year, they need to be more careful about the number of admits they send out unless their want their class size to grow. Thus, the easiest way to do this is to admit some, but waitlist many. As you get back decisions throughout early 2007, your yield figures for the year will start to materialize and you can start to take people off the waitlist with reasonable confidence that you know their yield.
That said, one could also argue that #1 isn't true - that #2 makes the opposite of #1 happen. That is - application volume might go down - just like how that gorgeous blond in high school never dated anyone - you always assumed she was too good for you, but so did everyone else, and she went and developed a serious self-image problem, became a binge eater, and one day when purging over the toilet in her doctor's office she ripped her esophagus and bled to death on the cold linoleum flooring, still clutching a photo of you from 1992 when she first fell in love.
Similarly the GSB here might be getting fewer apps - precisely because people view it as too much of a stretch school. Even so, if thats the case, then those who get in are (presumably) more likely to accept, so again, there's an argument to leverage the waitlist.
Either way, I should have dated that blond in high school.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 15 Mar 2005
Posts: 230
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
rhyme wrote: Either way, I should have dated that blond in high school.
Yeah...right!
tell that your fiance !
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club Legend
Affiliations: HHonors Diamond, BGS Honor Society
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 5881
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2009
GMAT 1: 730 Q45 V45
WE: Business Development (Consumer Products)
Followers: 196
Kudos [?]:
1365
[0], given: 7
|
luminos24 wrote: rhyme wrote: Either way, I should have dated that blond in high school. Yeah...right! tell that your fiance ! 
LOL!
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club Legend
Affiliations: HHonors Diamond, BGS Honor Society
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 5881
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2009
GMAT 1: 730 Q45 V45
WE: Business Development (Consumer Products)
Followers: 196
Kudos [?]:
1365
[0], given: 7
|
I just realized this thing has almost 3000 views and 200 replies.
Wow.
Imagine what it'll be once R2 hits!
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club Legend
Affiliations: HHonors Diamond, BGS Honor Society
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 5881
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2009
GMAT 1: 730 Q45 V45
WE: Business Development (Consumer Products)
Followers: 196
Kudos [?]:
1365
[0], given: 7
|
When is the R2 decision date?
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 1124
Schools: Chicago Booth
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
38
[0], given: 0
|
rhyme wrote: When is the R2 decision date?
March 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club Legend
Affiliations: HHonors Diamond, BGS Honor Society
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 5881
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2009
GMAT 1: 730 Q45 V45
WE: Business Development (Consumer Products)
Followers: 196
Kudos [?]:
1365
[0], given: 7
|
helg wrote: rhyme wrote: When is the R2 decision date? March 28, 2007
Good lord... thats sooooooooo far away.
I wonder if they'll push it up again
Hows it going on the apps guys? R2 deadline creeping up!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 23 Oct 2006
Posts: 177
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
I just submitted for R2. I see on the status page, it says Recommendations verified by Office: NO
Do they call the recommenders or just look over it?
Rhyme, I recall you said that none of your recommenders were contacted. Do you know how long after the R1 deadline did this status change?
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club Legend
Affiliations: HHonors Diamond, BGS Honor Society
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 5881
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2009
GMAT 1: 730 Q45 V45
WE: Business Development (Consumer Products)
Followers: 196
Kudos [?]:
1365
[0], given: 7
|
homefry wrote: I just submitted for R2. I see on the status page, it says Recommendations verified by Office: NO
Do they call the recommenders or just look over it?
Rhyme, I recall you said that none of your recommenders were contacted. Do you know how long after the R1 deadline did this status change?
Hmm.. I have no idea. I think it was after my interview though. Oddly enough, mine says yes, but to the best of my knowledge they were not contacted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 1124
Schools: Chicago Booth
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
38
[0], given: 0
|
rhyme wrote: helg wrote: rhyme wrote: When is the R2 decision date? March 28, 2007 Good lord... thats sooooooooo far away. I wonder if they'll push it up again  Hows it going on the apps guys? R2 deadline creeping up!
Yes... it is... almost three months!
But I've got a plan!
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 1124
Schools: Chicago Booth
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
38
[0], given: 0
|
rhyme wrote: homefry wrote: I just submitted for R2. I see on the status page, it says Recommendations verified by Office: NO
Do they call the recommenders or just look over it?
Rhyme, I recall you said that none of your recommenders were contacted. Do you know how long after the R1 deadline did this status change? Hmm.. I have no idea. I think it was after my interview though. Oddly enough, mine says yes, but to the best of my knowledge they were not contacted.
Mine haven't been contacted either. So, I guess by "verified" the AdCom means just "read thru"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|