Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Oct 2014, 04:21

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 08 Jul 2004
Posts: 606
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the [#permalink] New post 22 Mar 2005, 08:51
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (01:16) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer’s argument?

A. The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in other structures, such as houses and stores.
B. Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.
C. The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly different in quality from the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.
D. The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished.
E. The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930.
_________________

Regards, S

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 22 Mar 2005, 09:00
Wierd question. let me know if (D) is right.

(D) gives the motive to the builders or the carpenters to reduce the quality of the work they do.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 08 Jul 2004
Posts: 606
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 22 Mar 2005, 09:05
Anand, can you plz explain the question and the answer.
S
_________________

Regards, S

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5095
Location: Singapore
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 155 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 22 Mar 2005, 09:34
Guidebook writer:

1) I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930, quality of original carpentry work is superior to that in hotels built afterword
2) Clearly, carpenters working on 1930 worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built later.


Which of the following,if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer’s argument?

A. The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in other structures, such as houses and stores.
- out of scope

B. Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.
- out of scope

C. The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly different in quality from the materials available
to carpenters working after 1930.
- in that case, it supports the conclusion

D. The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished.
- out of scope

E. The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930.
- Sounds like the best choice among the 5. If average lenght of apprenticeship declined significantly since 1930, then it might be a case of lower-skilled carpenters after 1930, which results in lower quality of work.

I'll take E.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 619
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 22 Mar 2005, 09:36
any thing which comes close is D.

it gives a reason why the quality declined and has nothing to do with the skill.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5095
Location: Singapore
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 155 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 22 Mar 2005, 09:53
Ah yes, D makes sense now. The hotels would probably need to be rebuilt after demolition so this generates business for the carpenters.

Choice E would need another assumption to make it work.

D it is.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5095
Location: Singapore
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 155 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 22 Mar 2005, 09:59
Will probably have to wait a couple of days for more members to try out. But this is a good question. The answer choice touched on something really subtle. :-D
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2004
Posts: 459
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 22 Mar 2005, 10:09
D it is.

Author argues "skills of carpenters made the hotels superior",

but actually the "quality of orginal carpentry made the hotels superior".

so D
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 22 Mar 2005, 10:31
(E) is a trap i think.

Average training period decreased.
Assume average period before 1930 was 40 hours a week
Assume not the average is 30 hours a week.

Since it is average someone might be trainning for say 60 hours and few others might train for 20 hours a week.

If those who trained for 60 hours a week produced most of the furnitures then those furnitures will have superior quality.

Now to analyzing the argument

Premise
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward.

conclusion
Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.

The inherent assumption here is that there is no difference between capenters before 1930 and those after 1930. If there is no difference in all aspects (working conditions, training, time spent, quality of good and tools etc) only then the conclusion is valid. To weaken this argument we have to show that there is some difference between these carpenters.

(D) brings in a motive that differentiates these two carpenters form each other.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2005
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 22 Mar 2005, 12:29
ywilfred wrote:
E. The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930.
- Sounds like the best choice among the 5. If average lenght of apprenticeship declined significantly since 1930, then it might be a case of lower-skilled carpenters after 1930, which results in lower quality of work.

I'll take E.


E strengthens it rather than weakens it. D sounds best.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5095
Location: Singapore
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 155 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 22 Mar 2005, 22:09
cavalier wrote:
ywilfred wrote:
E. The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930.
- Sounds like the best choice among the 5. If average lenght of apprenticeship declined significantly since 1930, then it might be a case of lower-skilled carpenters after 1930, which results in lower quality of work.

I'll take E.


E strengthens it rather than weakens it. D sounds best.


I've changed it to D earlier. OA ?
  [#permalink] 22 Mar 2005, 22:09
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the az780 9 08 Feb 2008, 04:53
5 Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the JCLEONES 4 08 Jan 2008, 07:37
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the gregspirited 13 29 Nov 2007, 03:45
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the gamjatang 6 28 Dec 2005, 05:03
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the nakib77 19 17 Dec 2005, 10:34
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.