Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Jul 2014, 07:03

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 998
Location: South Korea
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the [#permalink] New post 28 Dec 2005, 05:03
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.


Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer’s argument?


A. The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in other structures, such as houses and stores.

B. Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.

C. The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly different in quality from the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.

D. The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished.

E. The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930.

_________________

Auge um Auge, Zahn um Zahn :twisted: !

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Posts: 555
Location: Germany
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 28 Dec 2005, 06:19
The conclusion that the carpentry work of hotels before the 30' were generally better than those afterwards is weakened if we know of the fact, that just those hotels built before the 30' that had an outstanding carpentry work survived until today.

I choose D
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 138
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 28 Dec 2005, 07:02
Absolute D. D basically conveys the message that the building built before 1930 which had bad carpentry have been demolished and the only good ones are remaining. So no wonder these are better than the buildings built after 1930.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 21 Sep 2003
Posts: 1071
Location: USA
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 28 Dec 2005, 09:16
Good one! Should be D.

Agree with plsubbu and allabout.

The EVIL Guide bookwriter :twisted: is forcing us to believe that all buildings built before 1930 have superior carpentry than the ones built after 1930.

For COMPARISON based CR questions:
1. Look at the sample that is being compared. Ask yourself, is the SAMPLE representative enough to make a GENERAL statement?
2. Is there any other sample that I can take and prove the argument is wrong?

Once we know that there is a problem with the sample, it can be countered in several ways:
1. The evil Guidebook writer might travelled only to a country where his observation is true. Another traveller might have the opposite experience from a different country where all bldgs built after 1930 have better carpentry. :lol:
2. Answer Choice D.

_________________

"To dream anything that you want to dream, that is the beauty of the human mind. To do anything that you want to do, that is the strength of the human will. To trust yourself, to test your limits, that is the courage to succeed."

- Bernard Edmonds

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 577
Location: NYC
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 28 Dec 2005, 12:45
edit.. i get it now.

_________________

Success is my only option, failure is not -- Eminem

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Posts: 78
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Hotels [#permalink] New post 28 Dec 2005, 13:59
gamjatang wrote:
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.


Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer’s argument?


A. The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in other structures, such as houses and stores.

B. Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.

C. The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly different in quality from the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.

D. The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished.

E. The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930.



I think it should be B. The conclusion is that carpenters worked more carefully with better skill before 1930. The evidence is that the capentry in buildings older than 1930 are in better shape than those in newer buidlings. To weaken that, B says that reasons other than carpenter's skill and effort has effects on the capentry that we see today.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 998
Location: South Korea
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 28 Dec 2005, 16:32
Yes, the Anwser is (D).

I believe that this type of logic flaw frequently apperas in gmat.

The article says X->Y, but the truth is Y->X.

_________________

Auge um Auge, Zahn um Zahn :twisted: !

  [#permalink] 28 Dec 2005, 16:32
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the fanatico 3 03 Apr 2011, 22:06
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the Puilunchristin 2 16 Jan 2006, 14:02
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the nakib77 19 17 Dec 2005, 10:34
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the saurya_s 10 22 Mar 2005, 08:51
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the drdas 7 03 Oct 2004, 17:37
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.