Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 08 Dec 2016, 06:43

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 22 Jul 2009
Posts: 201
Location: Manchester UK
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 358 [4] , given: 6

Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Dec 2009, 13:23
4
KUDOS
16
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

62% (02:17) correct 38% (01:38) wrong based on 736 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930
the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters
working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have
worked on hotels built subsequently.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer's argument?

(A) The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in
other structures, such as houses and stores.
(8) Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.
(C) The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly different in quality from
the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.
(D) The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and
be demolished.
(E) The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Intern
Joined: 07 Oct 2009
Posts: 33
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [2] , given: 1

Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Dec 2009, 13:47
2
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED

"The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished."....It means that most hotels built before 1930 have been put into disuse or demolished...only a few remain with has been compared with modern hotels(which may or may not have better carpentry).

It is like comparing two scores say 3/3 with 8/10....clearly first ratio is greater,but success rate is more in second as first one ignores failed cases.
Manager
Joined: 22 Jul 2009
Posts: 201
Location: Manchester UK
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 358 [0], given: 6

Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Dec 2009, 13:53
that was wonderful comparison....
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10441
Followers: 886

Kudos [?]: 191 [0], given: 0

Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Nov 2015, 06:44
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
SVP
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2085
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: Stanford '19
GMAT 1: 550 Q39 V27
GMAT 2: 560 Q42 V26
GMAT 3: 560 Q43 V24
GMAT 4: 650 Q49 V30
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 248 [2] , given: 124

Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Feb 2016, 15:02
2
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
sagarsabnis wrote:
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930
the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters
working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have
worked on hotels built subsequently.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer's argument?

(A) The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in
other structures, such as houses and stores.
(8) Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.
(C) The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly different in quality from
the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.
(D) The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and
be demolished.
(E) The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930.

to negate, we must prove that the skills of the carpenters did not get worse, or that the hotels which the writer visited were among the few of the ones built before 1930, which were built with high quality carpentry so that to last for a long time. it might be the case that carpets of some hotels from 1930 were not good, and thus, such hotels just simply did not last to live the writer's time...

A - other structures - irrelevant.
B - this might give alternative reason why the conditions of the carpets in hotels built after 1930 are worse. yet, it does not provide evidence that the quality is the same.
C - this actually strengthens the argument. same materials - but quality different. nowadays carpenters - bad.
D - ok, so the hotels built before 1930 are standing still, because they had better quality of carpentry. this means that there were hotels with lower quality, but which did not get to the writer's time... looks good. Now, the writer compares the hotels built before 1930, with exceptionally high quality, with hotels built after 1930, with "standard" quality. we can see that the comparison is not accurate.
E - this one strengthens the argument.
Manager
Joined: 03 Jul 2015
Posts: 81
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 41

Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2016, 20:26
Hi

I still dont understand why D is the correct answer?
Why are we assuming about demolition etc when it clearly says those hotels are still standing. Thats why he could visit them at first place.
Intern
Joined: 25 Mar 2016
Posts: 11
WE: Other (Other)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Apr 2016, 05:47
Argument and original statement has no match at all. Then How D?
Intern
Status: Preparing Applications and looking for consultants
Joined: 25 Jun 2015
Posts: 10
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 610 Q48 V30
GMAT 2: 700 Q48 V37
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 61

Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Aug 2016, 06:36
The explanation provided for D absolutely do not make any sense. It's a general statement which has no effect on the argument OR it is at least strengthening the carpenters who worked before 1930s.

Couldn't zero in on any answer. POE might get us to D but still it cannot weaken the Original argument in any way.
Debatable question.
Intern
Joined: 17 Feb 2015
Posts: 16
WE: Sales (Consulting)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 44

Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Aug 2016, 14:43
saran3h wrote:
The explanation provided for D absolutely do not make any sense. It's a general statement which has no effect on the argument OR it is at least strengthening the carpenters who worked before 1930s.

Couldn't zero in on any answer. POE might get us to D but still it cannot weaken the Original argument in any way.
Debatable question.

http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/formal-log ... reasoning/

Explained in detail!!
Intern
Joined: 08 May 2016
Posts: 27
Location: United States
WE: Project Management (Aerospace and Defense)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 24

Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2016, 15:03
I got this wrong, but what a beautiful question! Thought: current year isn't mentioned explicitly. I wonder how things would have changed it it were.
_________________

Manager
Joined: 18 Sep 2015
Posts: 97
GMAT 1: 610 Q43 V31
GMAT 2: 610 Q47 V27
GMAT 3: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 4: 700 Q49 V35
WE: Project Management (Health Care)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 609

Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Oct 2016, 01:56
sagarsabnis wrote:
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930
the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters
working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have
worked on hotels built subsequently.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer's argument?

(A) The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in
other structures, such as houses and stores.
(8) Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.
(C) The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly different in quality from
the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.
(D) The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and
be demolished.
(E) The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930.

This is the logical chain: More skills/care/effort --> better quality of carpentry
If we find somthing else that led to better carpentry we will weaken this conclusion.

Choice D says: Less liklehood that a hotel be demolished <-correlated-> better quality.
- it might be the case that people did not want their hotel to be demolished so they invested in better quality of carpentry.

Hence D is correct
Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the   [#permalink] 23 Oct 2016, 01:56
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the 8 22 Apr 2008, 17:20
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the 6 19 Jan 2008, 07:17
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the 13 29 Nov 2007, 03:45
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the 8 20 Oct 2007, 09:15
9 Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the 16 29 Sep 2007, 10:13
Display posts from previous: Sort by