Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 27 Aug 2016, 15:38
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Jul 2009
Posts: 201
Location: Manchester UK
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 275 [2] , given: 6

Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Dec 2009, 14:23
2
This post received
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

60% (02:17) correct 40% (01:33) wrong based on 469 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930
the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters
working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have
worked on hotels built subsequently.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer's argument?

(A) The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in
other structures, such as houses and stores.
(8) Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.
(C) The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly different in quality from
the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.
(D) The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and
be demolished.
(E) The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
2 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 07 Oct 2009
Posts: 33
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [2] , given: 1

Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Dec 2009, 14:47
2
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
The answer is 'D'.

"The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished."....It means that most hotels built before 1930 have been put into disuse or demolished...only a few remain with has been compared with modern hotels(which may or may not have better carpentry).

It is like comparing two scores say 3/3 with 8/10....clearly first ratio is greater,but success rate is more in second as first one ignores failed cases.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Jul 2009
Posts: 201
Location: Manchester UK
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 275 [0], given: 6

Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Dec 2009, 14:53
that was wonderful comparison....
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 9250
Followers: 804

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Nov 2015, 07:44
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
2 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 1637
Location: United States
Schools: Stanford '19
GMAT 1: 550 Q39 V27
GMAT 2: 560 Q42 V26
GMAT 3: 560 Q43 V24
GMAT 4: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.56
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 194 [2] , given: 109

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Feb 2016, 16:02
2
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
sagarsabnis wrote:
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930
the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters
working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have
worked on hotels built subsequently.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer's argument?

(A) The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in
other structures, such as houses and stores.
(8) Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.
(C) The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly different in quality from
the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.
(D) The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and
be demolished.
(E) The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930.


to negate, we must prove that the skills of the carpenters did not get worse, or that the hotels which the writer visited were among the few of the ones built before 1930, which were built with high quality carpentry so that to last for a long time. it might be the case that carpets of some hotels from 1930 were not good, and thus, such hotels just simply did not last to live the writer's time...

A - other structures - irrelevant.
B - this might give alternative reason why the conditions of the carpets in hotels built after 1930 are worse. yet, it does not provide evidence that the quality is the same.
C - this actually strengthens the argument. same materials - but quality different. nowadays carpenters - bad.
D - ok, so the hotels built before 1930 are standing still, because they had better quality of carpentry. this means that there were hotels with lower quality, but which did not get to the writer's time... looks good. Now, the writer compares the hotels built before 1930, with exceptionally high quality, with hotels built after 1930, with "standard" quality. we can see that the comparison is not accurate.
E - this one strengthens the argument.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 03 Jul 2015
Posts: 81
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 41

Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Apr 2016, 21:26
Hi

I still dont understand why D is the correct answer?
Why are we assuming about demolition etc when it clearly says those hotels are still standing. Thats why he could visit them at first place.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 25 Mar 2016
Posts: 11
WE: Other (Other)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Apr 2016, 06:47
Argument and original statement has no match at all. Then How D?
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Status: Retaker
Joined: 25 Jun 2015
Posts: 5
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Marketing
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 59

Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Aug 2016, 07:36
The explanation provided for D absolutely do not make any sense. It's a general statement which has no effect on the argument OR it is at least strengthening the carpenters who worked before 1930s.

Couldn't zero in on any answer. POE might get us to D but still it cannot weaken the Original argument in any way.
Debatable question.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2015
Posts: 15
WE: Sales (Consulting)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 43

Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Aug 2016, 15:43
saran3h wrote:
The explanation provided for D absolutely do not make any sense. It's a general statement which has no effect on the argument OR it is at least strengthening the carpenters who worked before 1930s.

Couldn't zero in on any answer. POE might get us to D but still it cannot weaken the Original argument in any way.
Debatable question.


http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/formal-log ... reasoning/

Explained in detail!!
Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the   [#permalink] 14 Aug 2016, 15:43
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the marcodonzelli 6 19 Jan 2008, 08:17
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the s_positive 8 20 Oct 2007, 10:15
8 Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the singh_amit19 16 29 Sep 2007, 11:13
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the circkit 10 27 Jun 2007, 06:13
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the uvs_mba 6 08 Nov 2006, 01:19
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.