Half of the subjects in an experiment the experimental group : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 17 Jan 2017, 02:40

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Half of the subjects in an experiment the experimental group

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 149
Location: Montreal
Schools: Harvard, Yale, HEC
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 81 [1] , given: 18

Half of the subjects in an experiment the experimental group [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jan 2011, 11:30
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

5% (low)

Question Stats:

77% (02:06) correct 23% (00:53) wrong based on 369 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Half of the subjects in an experiment—the experimental group—consumed large quantities of a popular artificial sweetener. Afterward, this group showed lower cognitive abilities than did the other half of the subjects—the control group—who did not consume the sweetener. The detrimental effects were attributed to an amino acid that is one of the sweetener’s principal constituents.

Which of the following, if true, would best help explain how the sweetener might produce the observed effect?
(A) The government’s analysis of the artificial sweetener determined that it was sold in relatively pure form.
(B) A high level of the amino acid in the blood inhibits the synthesis of a substance required for normal brain functioning.
(C) Because the sweetener is used primarily as a food additive, adverse reactions to it are rarely noticed by consumers.
(D) The amino acid that is a constituent of the sweetener is also sold separately as a dietary supplement.
(E) Subjects in the experiment did not know whether they were consuming the sweetener or a second, harmless substance.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
Should E be an assumption the conclusion need ? I wonder why E is wrong.
I eliminated B because we do not know if the experimental group consumes a significant amount of sweetener to add to the "high level of amino acid"

What do you think?
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by JarvisR on 15 Jul 2015, 01:04, edited 1 time in total.
If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 168
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 5

Re: Half of the subjects in an experiment the experimental group [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jan 2011, 13:09
Half of the subjects in an experiment—the experimental group—consumed large quantities of a popular artificial sweetener. Afterward, this group showed lower cognitive abilities than did the other half of the subjects—the control group—who did not consume the sweetener. The detrimental effects were attributed to an amino acid that is one of the sweetener’s principal constituents.

Large quantites of the sweetener corresponds to the high level of amino acid in the blood (if true).

My comment on E):
It's kind of standard to conduct experiments with one controll group whom receives placebo-pills/"sugar pills".
_________________

12/2010 GMATPrep 1 620 (Q34/V41)
01/2011 GMATPrep 2 640 (Q42/V36)
01/2011 GMATPrep 3 700 (Q47/V39)
02/2011 GMATPrep 4 710 (Q48/V39)
02/2011 MGMAT CAT 1 650 (Q46/V32)
02/2011 MGMAT CAT 2 680 (Q46/V36)
02/2011 MGMAT CAT 3 710 (Q45/V41)

Retired Moderator
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1712
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 96

Kudos [?]: 909 [0], given: 109

Re: Half of the subjects in an experiment the experimental group [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jan 2011, 15:09
+1 B
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3085
Followers: 783

Kudos [?]: 6510 [0], given: 1007

Re: Half of the subjects in an experiment the experimental group [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jan 2011, 15:11
The key is in the words : large quantities. the solution was fairly simple ...
_________________
Manager
Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 149
Location: Montreal
Schools: Harvard, Yale, HEC
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 18

Re: Half of the subjects in an experiment the experimental group [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jan 2011, 07:44
yeah, agreed
Manager
Joined: 02 Oct 2010
Posts: 158
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 29

Re: Half of the subjects in an experiment the experimental group [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jan 2011, 22:38
I went for B and got it right.
I found it very confusing though.
Current Student
Joined: 08 Jan 2009
Posts: 326
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V46
Followers: 25

Kudos [?]: 136 [0], given: 7

Re: Half of the subjects in an experiment the experimental group [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jan 2011, 02:28
B.

I don't see a rationale for E. The question asks, how does the sweetner CAUSE the effect.

E has no cause, it merely explains the experiment procedure. As it has overtones of avoiding the placebo affect, it is a natural draw, but the question very clearly asks for a cause.

E is almost like choosing an option that says "both groups were given different drugs", ok, but so what? There is no causal link there that the question asks for.

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Posts: 85
Location: United States (AL)
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 22

Re: Half of the subjects in an experiment the experimental group [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jan 2011, 04:39
B for me too..
Intern
Joined: 27 Sep 2010
Posts: 23
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 70

Re: Half of the subjects in an experiment the experimental group [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jan 2011, 04:51
Why B is correct?
Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 649
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 219 [0], given: 51

Re: Half of the subjects in an experiment the experimental group [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2011, 09:50
b . whats the doubt ?
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

Intern
Joined: 25 Apr 2011
Posts: 8
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Half of the subjects in an experiment the experimental group [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2011, 09:56
B is correct.
The question asks a reason to explain why the sweetner caused lower cognitive ability?
Premise given is that an amino acid contained in the sweetner caused the detrimental effect.
High consumption of sweetner = high levels of amino acid because it's the principal constituent.
and B says that high levels of amino in blood causes brain malfunction. and Hence B is the answer.
_________________

"Eat, Drink, and be Merry. For tomorrow we die." - Dave Matthews.

Manager
Status: One last try =,=
Joined: 11 Jun 2010
Posts: 141
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 80 [0], given: 32

Re: Half of the subjects in an experiment the experimental group [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2011, 20:06
The conclusion: The detrimental effects were attributed to an amino acid that is one of the sweetener’s principal constituents. shows the cause-effect relationship: An amino acid in the sweetener ---> detrimental effects (lower cognitive ability)

I think it is a Strengthen, not an Assumption question.

Choice E does not strengthen the conclusion. The fact that subjects know what they are consuming or not does not shed any light about the cause-effect relationship above.
_________________

There can be Miracles when you believe

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10528
Followers: 917

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Re: Half of the subjects in an experiment the experimental group [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jun 2016, 11:21
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Intern
Status: Pursuit of Happiness
Joined: 10 Sep 2016
Posts: 31
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: HBS '19, CBS '19
GMAT 1: 590 Q44 V27
GMAT 2: 690 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.94
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 10 [1] , given: 61

GMATPrep Question: Sweetener and Cognitive Abilities [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2016, 14:43
1
KUDOS
Half of the subjects in an experiment--the experimental group--consumed large quantities of a popular artificial sweetener. Afterward, this group showed lower cognitive abilities than did the other half of the subjects--the control group--who did not consume the sweetener. The detrimental effects were attributed to an amino acid that is one of the sweetener’s principal constituents.

Which of the following, if true, would best support the conclusion that some ingredient of the sweetener was responsible for the experimental results?

A. Most consumers of the sweetener do not consume as much of it as the experimental group members did.
B. The amino acid referred to in the conclusion is a component of all proteins, some of which must be consumed for adequate nutrition.
C. The quantity of the sweetener consumed by individuals in the experimental group is considered safe by federal food regulators.
D. The two groups of subjects were evenly matched with regard to cognitive abilities prior to the experiment.
E. A second experiment in which subjects consumed large quantities of the sweetener lacked a control group of subjects who were not given the sweetener.

This is a good CR question from GMATPrep.

--
Need Kudos
_________________

If you find this post hepful, please press +1 Kudos

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 3697
Followers: 1288

Kudos [?]: 5832 [0], given: 66

Re: GMATPrep Question: Sweetener and Cognitive Abilities [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2016, 15:48
moulayabdesslam wrote:
Half of the subjects in an experiment--the experimental group--consumed large quantities of a popular artificial sweetener. Afterward, this group showed lower cognitive abilities than did the other half of the subjects--the control group--who did not consume the sweetener. The detrimental effects were attributed to an amino acid that is one of the sweetener’s principal constituents.

Which of the following, if true, would best support the conclusion that some ingredient of the sweetener was responsible for the experimental results?

A. Most consumers of the sweetener do not consume as much of it as the experimental group members did.
B. The amino acid referred to in the conclusion is a component of all proteins, some of which must be consumed for adequate nutrition.
C. The quantity of the sweetener consumed by individuals in the experimental group is considered safe by federal food regulators.
D. The two groups of subjects were evenly matched with regard to cognitive abilities prior to the experiment.
E. A second experiment in which subjects consumed large quantities of the sweetener lacked a control group of subjects who were not given the sweetener.

This is a good CR question from GMATPrep.

--
Need Kudos

Dear moulayabdesslam,
This is a great question! I'm happy to help.

For this and related question, it's good to have the general ideas of experimental design. See:
Medical Trials and the Placebo Effect on the GMAT Critical Reasoning

A. Most consumers of the sweetener do not consume as much of it as the experimental group members did.
The conclusion concerned the comparison of control group to experimental group. What people do in the outside world is not directly relevant to the conclusions based on this within-experiment comparison. This is not correct.

B. The amino acid referred to in the conclusion is a component of all proteins, some of which must be consumed for adequate nutrition.
That's fascinating but it doesn't help us at all in deciding whether this amino acid or anything else in the sweetener played a role in making the experimental group show lower cognitive abilities. This is not correct

C. The quantity of the sweetener consumed by individuals in the experimental group is considered safe by federal food regulators.
Well, that's certainly good: for legal and ethical reasons, we would hope that this is true, but other than keeping people alive, this plays no role in determining what caused the difference in abilities. This is not correct

D. The two groups of subjects were evenly matched with regard to cognitive abilities prior to the experiment.
Aha! This is interesting! Suppose this weren't true! For the sake of argument, suppose the challenge were mathematical in nature. Suppose the control group were a bunch of people with Ph.D.s in mathematics and experimental group were folks who could not get past Algebra One in school. Clearly, these two groups have differing mathematical abilities! If they perform differently on a math task, that's hardly a surprise, and probably not due to the sweetener or whatever is in it! If the two groups have different abilities, then that introduces a plausible alternative explanation for the differing performances in cognitive abilities. A good experimental design would guarantee that the folks in the two groups were evenly matched in cognitive skills, so that there was no pronounced difference in either direction, so that the result can only be attributable to the sweetener and nothing but the sweetener. This extraordinarily strengthens the conclusion!

E. A second experiment in which subjects consumed large quantities of the sweetener lacked a control group of subjects who were not given the sweetener.
The second experiment sounds poorly designed, and tells us nothing about the conclusion in the first experiment. This is incorrect.

The only possible answer is (D).

Let me know if you have any questions.

Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 3697
Followers: 1288

Kudos [?]: 5832 [0], given: 66

Re: Half of the subjects in an experiment the experimental group [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2016, 15:53
moulayabdesslam wrote:
Need Kudos

Dear moulayabdesslam,

My friend, I should have noticed this before my previous response, but you committed a breach of protocol on GMAT Club. Never never never post in a new thread a question that has already been posted. Many GMAT Prep questions are already here. Always always always search extensively for a question before posting it in a new thread. If a question has already been posted, ask your questions there (you may find your question has already been answered by the experts' responses in that pre-existing thread). This particularly question has already been posted, so I merged your topic into this one. If you wish for more kudos, the first step would be to learn all the protocols of GMAT Club and not to violate them.

Does all this make sense?
Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Intern
Status: Pursuit of Happiness
Joined: 10 Sep 2016
Posts: 31
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: HBS '19, CBS '19
GMAT 1: 590 Q44 V27
GMAT 2: 690 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.94
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 61

Re: Half of the subjects in an experiment the experimental group [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2016, 15:59
mikemcgarry wrote:
Dear moulayabdesslam,
This is a great question! I'm happy to help.

For this and related question, it's good to have the general ideas of experimental design. See:
Medical Trials and the Placebo Effect on the GMAT Critical Reasoning

A. Most consumers of the sweetener do not consume as much of it as the experimental group members did.
The conclusion concerned the comparison of control group to experimental group. What people do in the outside world is not directly relevant to the conclusions based on this within-experiment comparison. This is not correct.

B. The amino acid referred to in the conclusion is a component of all proteins, some of which must be consumed for adequate nutrition.
That's fascinating but it doesn't help us at all in deciding whether this amino acid or anything else in the sweetener played a role in making the experimental group show lower cognitive abilities. This is not correct

C. The quantity of the sweetener consumed by individuals in the experimental group is considered safe by federal food regulators.
Well, that's certainly good: for legal and ethical reasons, we would hope that this is true, but other than keeping people alive, this plays no role in determining what caused the difference in abilities. This is not correct

D. The two groups of subjects were evenly matched with regard to cognitive abilities prior to the experiment.
Aha! This is interesting! Suppose this weren't true! For the sake of argument, suppose the challenge were mathematical in nature. Suppose the control group were a bunch of people with Ph.D.s in mathematics and experimental group were folks who could not get past Algebra One in school. Clearly, these two groups have differing mathematical abilities! If they perform differently on a math task, that's hardly a surprise, and probably not due to the sweetener or whatever is in it! If the two groups have different abilities, then that introduces a plausible alternative explanation for the differing performances in cognitive abilities. A good experimental design would guarantee that the folks in the two groups were evenly matched in cognitive skills, so that there was no pronounced difference in either direction, so that the result can only be attributable to the sweetener and nothing but the sweetener. This extraordinarily strengthens the conclusion!

E. A second experiment in which subjects consumed large quantities of the sweetener lacked a control group of subjects who were not given the sweetener.
The second experiment sounds poorly designed, and tells us nothing about the conclusion in the first experiment. This is incorrect.

The only possible answer is (D).

Let me know if you have any questions.

Mike

Thank you, Mike, for a wonderful explanation! The Ph. D/Algebra One Class analogy made me laugh. As a friend says, rien de mieux que de joindre l'utilie à l'agréable! (Tr: Nothing is better than to join the useful to the pleasant).

Have a great evening!
Moulay

--
Need Kudos
_________________

If you find this post hepful, please press +1 Kudos

Re: Half of the subjects in an experiment the experimental group   [#permalink] 17 Oct 2016, 15:59
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Strengthen: Half of the subjects in an experiment... 5 18 Dec 2016, 21:51
In clinical trials of new medicines, half of the subjects receive the 0 11 Dec 2014, 19:19
20 In a recent study, a group of subjects had their normal dail 7 11 Nov 2013, 13:41
1 Half of the subjects in an experiment the experimental group 2 14 Aug 2012, 22:58
Half of the subjects in an experiment the experimental group 2 14 Aug 2012, 10:52
Display posts from previous: Sort by