Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 Oct 2014, 00:25

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Handwriting analysis also known as graphology is a poor way

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Aug 2005
Posts: 415
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Handwriting analysis also known as graphology is a poor way [#permalink] New post 18 Sep 2006, 15:55
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (01:38) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 7 sessions
Handwriting analysis—also known as graphology—is a poor way to predict personality types, even though it is used by 3,000 United States firms and by a majority of European companies. In a recent study, five graphologists scored no better than chance in predicting the occupations of forty professionals.
Which one of the following is an assumption necessary to the argument?
(A) People in the same occupation usually do not have the same personality type.
(B) Graphology is an effective means of predicting personality types in non-business contexts.
(C) There are more United States firms that do not use graphology than all the United States and European firms that do use it.
(D) There are several other techniques for predicting personality types that are more accurate than graphology.
(E) There is a correspondence between type of personality and choice of occupation.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 212
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Sep 2006, 17:28
E?....

The argument assumes that when the graphologists identify occupations, they are able to identify personalities.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1176
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Sep 2006, 17:47
think it is E.

The conclusion is about personality, whereas the evidence is about occupation.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 761
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Sep 2006, 18:10
E for me as well
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1026
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Sep 2006, 18:36
yeah..its E
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 170
Followers: 25

Kudos [?]: 103 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Sep 2006, 18:41
Yes it is E.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1136
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 20 Sep 2006, 00:26
Straight E.

conclusion: Handwriting analysis cannot predict personalities.
premise: 5 graphologistic could not predict occupations.
assumption: personalities are related to occupations.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 716
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 20 Sep 2006, 12:18
Straight E.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 02 Jun 2006
Posts: 1270
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 20 Sep 2006, 12:36
(E) There is a correspondence between type of personality and choice of occupation.

Knowing gmacvik's questions I am wondering if there is a trick here... :stupid
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 2135
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 87 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 20 Sep 2006, 13:01
crooked E
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Aug 2005
Posts: 415
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 20 Sep 2006, 16:49
no trick here.These are some of the questions, which I got wrong.
OA is E
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 10 Feb 2006
Posts: 664
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 0

Handwriting analysis also known as graphology is a poor way [#permalink] New post 23 Jul 2007, 08:12
Handwriting analysis—also known as graphology—is a poor way to predict personality types, even though it is used by 3,000 United States firms and by a majority of European companies. In a recent study, five graphologists scored no better than chance in predicting the occupations of forty professionals.
Which one of the following is an assumption necessary to the argument?
(A) People in the same occupation usually do not have the same personality type.
(B) Graphology is an effective means of predicting personality types in non-business contexts.
(C) There are more United States firms that do not use graphology than all the United States and European firms that do use it.
(D) There are several other techniques for predicting personality types that are more accurate than graphology.
(E) There is a correspondence between type of personality and choice of occupation.


Please support your conclusion with evidence. Thanks
_________________

GMAT the final frontie!!!.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Jun 2007
Posts: 374
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Jul 2007, 08:21
B, C & D are irrelevant to the argument.

down to A & E.

argument states handwriting predicts personality. argument states graphologists were unable to guess occupations of 40 professionals based on handwriting analysis.

the argument is assuming there is a connection between personality and occupation, since graphologists will deduce first personality using handwriting analysis and then conclude the occupations based on personality.

the best answer is E.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 216
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Jul 2007, 11:08
Easy E. Clearly find a connection between occupation and the tests.
2 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 47
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 54 [2] , given: 0

Re: CR - LSAT [#permalink] New post 21 Dec 2008, 00:06
2
This post received
KUDOS
HWA = Hand writing analysis
P = Personality
PO = Predicting Occupations

Since, HWA has no correlation with P.
HWA <----|----> P

Similarly from conclusion.
HWA <----|----> PO

This will happen only if P and PO are co-related. Or P<--->PO.

Straight E
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1435
Followers: 35

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 1

Re: CR - LSAT [#permalink] New post 21 Dec 2008, 13:13
Straight E. Fill the logic gap.

G is about personality types

Bunch of G specialists tried to predict occupations.

Assumption needed that PT and O has a link.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Dec 2011
Posts: 453
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 146 [0], given: 70

Re: Handwriting analysis also known as graphology is a poor way [#permalink] New post 15 Apr 2013, 20:10
Duplicates posts on the same topic has been merged.
Re: Handwriting analysis also known as graphology is a poor way   [#permalink] 15 Apr 2013, 20:10
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 Handwriting analysis also known as graphology is a poor way Nihit 9 09 May 2008, 13:20
Handwriting analysis also known as graphology is a poor way alimad 0 21 Dec 2008, 13:13
A firm that specializes in the analysis of handwriting Debankur Naskar 0 10 Aug 2005, 10:48
A firm that specializes in the analysis of handwriting riteshgupta1 0 24 Aug 2005, 15:00
A firm that specializes in the analysis of handwriting dipaksingh 0 16 Feb 2005, 16:15
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Handwriting analysis also known as graphology is a poor way

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.