Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 10:50 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 10:50

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 17 Oct 2012
Posts: 38
Own Kudos [?]: 1100 [247]
Given Kudos: 8
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 520 Q35 V26
GMAT 2: 670 Q48 V34
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42104 [43]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
VP
VP
Joined: 29 Aug 2012
Status:Chasing my MBB Dream!
Posts: 1057
Own Kudos [?]: 6255 [31]
Given Kudos: 330
Location: United States (DC)
WE:General Management (Aerospace and Defense)
Send PM
General Discussion
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 May 2013
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 19 [3]
Given Kudos: 10
Send PM
Re: In the field of eugenics, geneticists have thoroughly scrutinized the [#permalink]
3
Kudos
NeverSurrender wrote:
In the field of eugenics, geneticists have thoroughly scrutinized the human genome and its ability to shape certain traits to select and pre-determine an increasing impressive number of physiological characteristics in the unborn, each “ready to order” to parents’ specifications.

A) increasing impressive number of physiological characteristics in the unborn, each
B) increasingly impressive number of physiological characteristics in those not yet born, and each one
C) increasing impressive number of physiological characteristics in those unborn who are
D) increasingly impressive number of physiological characteristics in the unborn, all of them
E) increasingly impressive number of physiological characteristics in the unborn


A) increasing impressive number of physiological characteristics in the unborn, each -out
B) increasingly impressive number of physiological characteristics in those not yet born, and each one - wordy = out
C) increasing impressive number of physiological characteristics in those unborn who are - out
D) increasingly impressive number of physiological characteristics in the unborn, all of them -out
E) increasingly impressive number of physiological characteristics in the unborn -correct

IMO E
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Oct 2014
Posts: 160
Own Kudos [?]: 65 [2]
Given Kudos: 17
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V39
WE:Sales (Other)
Send PM
Re: In the field of eugenics, geneticists have thoroughly scrutinized the [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
In the field of eugenics, geneticists have thoroughly scrutinized the human genome and its ability to shape certain traits to select and pre-determine an increasing impressive number of physiological characteristics in the unborn, each “ready to order” to parents’ specifications.

A) increasing impressive number of physiological characteristics in the unborn, each

the number is "increasing impressive" doesn't make sense, incorrect.

B) increasingly impressive number of physiological characteristics in those not yet born, and each one

'those not yet born' reads very strangely, out.

C) increasing impressive number of physiological characteristics in those unborn who are

the number is "increasing impressive" doesn't make sense, incorrect.

D) increasingly impressive number of physiological characteristics in the unborn, all of them

"all of them" doesn't make sense if you get nitpicky but i'm not sure...could refer to too many things

E) increasingly impressive number of physiological characteristics in the unborn

I like this one the most although I personally feel it reads strangely. E
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 17 Oct 2012
Posts: 55
Own Kudos [?]: 530 [3]
Given Kudos: 53
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: In the field of eugenics, geneticists have thoroughly scrutinized the [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
souvik101990 wrote:
New Project - Reviving the hardest questions on GMAT Club. Kudos for every reply with an explanation in the first 24 hours!


In the field of eugenics, geneticists have thoroughly scrutinized the human genome and its ability to shape certain traits to select and pre-determine an increasing impressive number of physiological characteristics in the unborn, each “ready to order” to parents’ specifications.

A) increasing impressive number of physiological characteristics in the unborn, each
B) increasingly impressive number of physiological characteristics in those not yet born, and each one
C) increasing impressive number of physiological characteristics in those unborn who are
D) increasingly impressive number of physiological characteristics in the unborn, all of them
E) increasingly impressive number of physiological characteristics in the unborn


First split increasing Vs increasingly --> as we are modifying "number of physiological characteristics", which is modified by adjective -> "impressive" so we require and adverb to modify ADJECTIVE+NOUN construction so usage of "Increasingly" is appropriate.

A and C out.

In B, after COMMA+AND we require full clause so ",and each one “ready to order” to parents’ specifications." does not makes sense.

In D, "all of them “ready to order” to parents’ specifications." should be a full clause and them is ambiguous.

In E, “ready to order” to parents’ specifications- modifies "unborn".

So E should be right answer.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2015
Posts: 172
Own Kudos [?]: 149 [3]
Given Kudos: 242
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V36
GPA: 3.56
Send PM
Re: In the field of eugenics, geneticists have thoroughly scrutinized the [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
In the field of eugenics, geneticists have thoroughly scrutinized the human genome and its ability to shape certain traits to select and pre-determine an increasing impressive number of physiological characteristics in the unborn, each “ready to order” to parents’ specifications.

A. increasing impressive number of physiological characteristics in the unborn, each

--> We have two adjectives: increasing and impressive that are not joined correctly.

B. increasingly impressive number of physiological characteristics in those not yet born , and each one

--> , and requires complete sentence if it's not the case that we join similar items in a list.
those not yet born is wordy and awkward.

C. increasing impressive number of physiological characteristics in those unborn who are

--> We have two adjectives: increasing and impressive that are not joined correctly.
We do not have any proper reason to include those.

D. increasingly impressive number of physiological characteristics in the unborn, all of them

--> them is ambiguous: does them refer to characteristics or the unborn ?

E. increasingly impressive number of physiological characteristics in the unborn

--> correct.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 14 Oct 2012
Posts: 117
Own Kudos [?]: 258 [1]
Given Kudos: 1023
Send PM
Re: In the field of eugenics, geneticists have thoroughly scrutinized the [#permalink]
1
Kudos
My 2 cents:
I think this link is useful: https://grammarist.com/grammar/coordinate-adjectives/
Coordinate adjectives are adjectives that appear in sequence with one another to modify the same noun. For example, the adjectives in the phrases bright, sunny day and dark and stormy night are coordinate adjectives. Coordinate adjectives are usually separated with either commas or and, and "and" always comes before the final adjective.

Some sequential pairs or groups of adjectives that modify single nouns are not coordinate. For example, in the phrase harsh verbal warning, harsh and verbal are not coordinate adjectives because harsh modifies the phrase verbal warning.
If you ever have difficulty deciding whether a pair or group of adjectives is coordinate, try inserting and between them. If and would work, the adjectives are coordinate and hence do need a comma.


For example,
Forecasters warned of another day of hot, windy conditions across Southern California on Sunday. [Los Angeles Times]
In addition, their breathtakingly cruel and callous actions also led to a tribute plaque. [Liverpool Echo]
Obama stands accused of giving stuffy, cliche-ridden graduation speeches. [Standard-Examiner]

And these adjective pairs are not coordinate because they modify their nouns in different ways:
Amazon prepping multiple wallet-friendly tablets. [CNET]
With this in mind, I wanted to design a screen to identify dirt-cheap smaller companies. [Seeking Alpha]
The Red Wings are demonstrably a tough hockey team. [Detroit News (link now dead)]
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 2642
Own Kudos [?]: 7775 [4]
Given Kudos: 55
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Send PM
Re: In the field of eugenics, geneticists have thoroughly scrutinized the [#permalink]
4
Kudos
Expert Reply
I think there are definitely a few transcription errors here. First, notice that "an" shouldn't be underlined. As for E, it should have a comma at the end, at the very least.
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 16 May 2018
Posts: 40
Own Kudos [?]: 12 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: In the field of eugenics, geneticists have thoroughly scrutinized the [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
‘Increasingly impressive’ is the correct usage, (increasingly is used to modify adjectives). So A and C are out.

‘Each one’ is a modifier, so it cannot be connected with ‘and’, so B is wrong.

‘Number’ is the subject in D and it is singular. So it does not fir with ‘all of them’



So E is the right option
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 May 2018
Posts: 98
Own Kudos [?]: 74 [0]
Given Kudos: 75
Send PM
Re: In the field of eugenics, geneticists have thoroughly scrutinized the [#permalink]
Can somebody explain the meaning of the sentence?

ready to order what?

Thanks!
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 2642
Own Kudos [?]: 7775 [0]
Given Kudos: 55
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Send PM
Re: In the field of eugenics, geneticists have thoroughly scrutinized the [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Kanika3agg The intended meaning seems to be "made-to-order," as in put together according to the customer's specifications.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 May 2018
Posts: 98
Own Kudos [?]: 74 [0]
Given Kudos: 75
Send PM
Re: In the field of eugenics, geneticists have thoroughly scrutinized the [#permalink]
DmitryFarber wrote:
Kanika3agg The intended meaning seems to be "made-to-order," as in put together according to the customer's specifications.


DmitryFarber Thank you, I got this!

In the field of eugenics, geneticists have thoroughly scrutinized the human genome and its ability to shape certain traits to select and pre-determine an increasingly impressive number of physiological characteristics in the unborn “ready to order” to parents’ specifications.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Jul 2019
Posts: 47
Own Kudos [?]: 12 [0]
Given Kudos: 40
Send PM
Re: In the field of eugenics, geneticists have thoroughly scrutinized the [#permalink]
manhattan gmat says "a number of+plural comments noun" means many items i.e. plural then how come all of them is wrong?
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2020
Posts: 119
Own Kudos [?]: 93 [0]
Given Kudos: 78
Send PM
In the field of eugenics, geneticists have thoroughly scrutinized the [#permalink]
Why is increasing wrong? I have done a few problems that are in the form of adj+adj+noun. I know this usage depends on the context, but from this problem, I can't tell if "increasing" is modifying "impressive" or "number"!

An example of adj+adj+noun would be:

https://gmatclub.com/forum/reporting-th ... 67639.html

GMATNinja Could you help please?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Jan 2020
Posts: 250
Own Kudos [?]: 102 [0]
Given Kudos: 477
Send PM
Re: In the field of eugenics, geneticists have thoroughly scrutinized the [#permalink]
VeritasKarishma

In D, can't them refer to characteristics and consequently we can then say that these characteristics are ready to order
Director
Director
Joined: 16 Jun 2021
Posts: 994
Own Kudos [?]: 183 [0]
Given Kudos: 309
Send PM
Re: In the field of eugenics, geneticists have thoroughly scrutinized the [#permalink]
(A) increasing impressive number of physiological characteristics in the unborn, each
(B) increasingly impressive number of physiological characteristics in those not yet born, and each one
(C) increasing impressive number of physiological characteristics in those unborn who are
(D) increasingly impressive number of physiological characteristics in the unborn, all of them
(E) increasingly impressive number of physiological characteristics in the unborn

A , C out since it isn't sync with throughly so increasingly
B in thoae not yet born too wordy unborn is far better
D All of them doesn't have a subject id it the baby or the genetic characters hence
IMO E
Intern
Intern
Joined: 19 Aug 2020
Posts: 47
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 77
Location: United Kingdom
Send PM
Re: In the field of eugenics, geneticists have thoroughly scrutinized the [#permalink]
Hello,


I can't properly understand why "increasing" is wrong here ?

How do we know that an adjective ("increasing") modifying "number" is wrong ? In other words, how do we know that the increase should be modify "impressive" ?

More generally, is there a way to determine when a noun or a pronoun is being modified rather than everything else, requiring an adverb?


Thanks


NeverSurrender wrote:
In the field of eugenics, geneticists have thoroughly scrutinized the human genome and its ability to shape certain traits to select and pre-determine an increasing impressive number of physiological characteristics in the unborn, each “ready to order” to parents’ specifications.

(A) increasing impressive number of physiological characteristics in the unborn, each
(B) increasingly impressive number of physiological characteristics in those not yet born, and each one
(C) increasing impressive number of physiological characteristics in those unborn who are
(D) increasingly impressive number of physiological characteristics in the unborn, all of them
(E) increasingly impressive number of physiological characteristics in the unborn
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Posts: 5123
Own Kudos [?]: 4683 [1]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Send PM
Re: In the field of eugenics, geneticists have thoroughly scrutinized the [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Naptiste wrote:
Hello,


I can't properly understand why "increasing" is wrong here ?

How do we know that an adjective ("increasing") modifying "number" is wrong ? In other words, how do we know that the increase should be modify "impressive" ?

More generally, is there a way to determine when a noun or a pronoun is being modified rather than everything else, requiring an adverb?


Thanks


NeverSurrender wrote:
In the field of eugenics, geneticists have thoroughly scrutinized the human genome and its ability to shape certain traits to select and pre-determine an increasing impressive number of physiological characteristics in the unborn, each “ready to order” to parents’ specifications.

(A) increasing impressive number of physiological characteristics in the unborn, each
(B) increasingly impressive number of physiological characteristics in those not yet born, and each one
(C) increasing impressive number of physiological characteristics in those unborn who are
(D) increasingly impressive number of physiological characteristics in the unborn, all of them
(E) increasingly impressive number of physiological characteristics in the unborn


Hello Naptiste,

We hope this finds you well.

Having gone through the question and your query, we believe we can resolve your doubt.

In this question, you must consider the meaning of the sentence to determine whether the adjective or adverb is the correct form to use. Here, if the adjective "increasing" is applied it will modify "number", awkwardly implying that the number of physiological characteristics in the unborn is impressive and currently increasing; the meaning conveyed through the use of the adverb "increasingly" - that the number of physiological characteristics in the unborn continually grows more impressive is more logical.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Apr 2016
Posts: 209
Own Kudos [?]: 48 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V33
Send PM
Re: In the field of eugenics, geneticists have thoroughly scrutinized the [#permalink]
Could anybody explain why the option D is wrong :

an increasingly impressive number of physiological characteristics in the unborn, all of them

"all of them" looks fine with "An increasingly impressive number of physiological characteristics"

AjiteshArun : Could you please help in it ?
GMAT Club Bot
Re: In the field of eugenics, geneticists have thoroughly scrutinized the [#permalink]
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne