finder_003 wrote:
Hardin argued that grazing land held in common (that is, open to any user) would always be used less carefully than private grazing land. Each rancher would be tempted to overuse common land because the benefits would accrue to the individual, while the costs of reduced land quality that results from overuse would be spread among all users. But a study comparing 217 million acres of common grazing land with 433 million acres of private grazing land showed that the common land was in better condition.
The answer to which of the following questions would be most useful in evaluating the significance, in relation to Hardin's claim, of the study described above?
a. Was the private land that was studied of comparable quality to the common land before either was used for grazing?
b. Did any of the ranchers whose land was studied use both common and private land?
c.Were the users of the common land that was studied at least as prosperous as the users of the private land?
d. Did the ranchers whose land was studied tend to prefer using common land before either was used for grazing?
e. Were there any owners of herds who used only common land, and no private land for grazing.
Any ideas??? Thanks!!!!
A.
We need to assess whether the land quality is equal before makign such a claim as the argument does.
close
