Having just completed Introductory Logic 9, I feel competent : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 03 Dec 2016, 16:07

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Having just completed Introductory Logic 9, I feel competent

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 03 Jul 2003
Posts: 652
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 91 [0], given: 0

Having just completed Introductory Logic 9, I feel competent [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Nov 2003, 12:00
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Having just completed Introductory Logic 9, I feel competent to instruct others in the intricacies of this wonderful discipline. Logic is concerned with correct reasoning in the form of syllogisms. A syllogism consists of three statements, two of which are premises, the third of which is the conclusion. Here is an example.

MAJOR PREMISE: The American buffalo is disappearing.
MINOR PREMISE: The Animal is an American buffalo.
CONCLUSION: Therefore, this animal is disappearing.

Once one has been indoctrinated into the mysteries of this arcane science, there is no statement he may not assert with complete confidence.

The main purpose of the author's argument is to

A) provide instruction in logic
B) supply a definition
C) cast doubt on the value of formal logic.
D) present an argument for the protection of American buffalo.
E) show the precise relationship between the premises and the conclusion of his example.

IтАЩve two questions,

1. What is the meaning of тАЬthere is no statement he may not assert with compete confidenceтАЭ
2. answer to the question and the underlying reasoning.
If you have any questions
New!
VP
Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Posts: 1348
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 May 2006, 12:19
Having just completed Introductory Logic 9, I feel competent to instruct others in the intricacies of this wonderful discipline. Logic is concerned with correct reasoning in the form of syllogisms. A syllogism consists of three statements, two of which are premises, the third of which is the conclusion. Here is an example.

MAJOR PREMISE: The American buffalo is disappearing.
MINOR PREMISE: The Animal is an American buffalo.
CONCLUSION: Therefore, this animal is disappearing.

Once one has been indoctrinated into the mysteries of this arcane science, there is no statement he may not assert with complete confidence.

The main purpose of the author's argument is to

A) provide instruction in logic
B) supply a definition
C) cast doubt on the value of formal logic.
D) present an argument for the protection of American buffalo.
E) show the precise relationship between the premises and the conclusion of his example.

E. show the precise relationship between the premises and the conclusion of his example.

[quote] 1. What is the meaning of â€œthere is no statement he may not assert with compete confidenceâ€
Director
Joined: 06 May 2006
Posts: 792
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

20 May 2006, 00:01
My vote goes to B.

A definition of 'Syllogism' has been given, with a supporting example, but no explanation of the example i.e. there is nothing that shows the 'the precise relationship between the premises and the conclusion of his example'.
VP
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1131
Location: India
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

20 May 2006, 00:31
I'll also go with E.
The author gives the relationship between the premises and conclusion and on the basis of that states that ' there is no statement he may not assert with complete confidence '.
Director
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 790
Location: BULGARIA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

20 May 2006, 01:32
Hmmm...I think it is A)
The main purpose of his argument is to provide instruction in logic. In his example the author gives an example of syllogism, which consists of 2 premises and a conclusion.
So think that the main purpose of his/her argument is instructive. or A)
Intern
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 15
Location: Indiana
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

20 May 2006, 04:30
[quote="kpadma"]Having just completed Introductory Logic 9, I feel competent to instruct others in the intricacies of this wonderful discipline. Logic is concerned with correct reasoning in the form of syllogisms. A syllogism consists of three statements, two of which are premises, the third of which is the conclusion. Here is an example.

MAJOR PREMISE: The American buffalo is disappearing.
MINOR PREMISE: The Animal is an American buffalo.
CONCLUSION: Therefore, this animal is disappearing.

Once one has been indoctrinated into the mysteries of this arcane science, there is no statement he may not assert with complete confidence.

The main purpose of the author's argument is to

A) provide instruction in logic
B) supply a definition
C) cast doubt on the value of formal logic.
D) present an argument for the protection of American buffalo.
E) show the precise relationship between the premises and the conclusion of his example.

Iâ€™ve two questions,

1. What is the meaning of â€œthere is no statement he may not assert with compete confidenceâ€
Director
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 659
Location: London
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

20 May 2006, 06:06
I go with B.
He is explaining the term Introductory Logic by giving a detailed explanation.
Intern
Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 27
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 May 2006, 02:13
[quote="kpadma"]Having just completed Introductory Logic 9, I feel competent to instruct others in the intricacies of this wonderful discipline. Logic is concerned with correct reasoning in the form of syllogisms. A syllogism consists of three statements, two of which are premises, the third of which is the conclusion. "syllogisms is defined here "'Here is an example.

MAJOR PREMISE: The American buffalo is disappearing.
MINOR PREMISE: The Animal is an American buffalo.
CONCLUSION: Therefore, this animal is disappearing.

Once one has been indoctrinated into the mysteries of this arcane science, there is no statement he may not assert with complete confidence.

The main purpose of the author's argument is to

A) provide instruction in logic
B) supply a definition -- so i dont think B is the answer
C) cast doubt on the value of formal logic.
D) present an argument for the protection of American buffalo.
E) show the precise relationship between the premises and the conclusion of his example.

Iâ€™ve two questions,

1. What is the meaning of â€œthere is no statement he may not assert with compete confidenceâ€
_________________

If not now WHEN !!

SVP
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1737
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 May 2006, 02:09
Will go with B here. The author is defining what logic is by giving examples and in conclusion saying its easy to apply in evry situation
Manager
Joined: 10 May 2006
Posts: 126
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 May 2006, 07:20
[quote="kpadma"]Having just completed Introductory Logic 9, I feel competent to instruct others in the intricacies of this wonderful discipline. Logic is concerned with correct reasoning in the form of syllogisms. A syllogism consists of three statements, two of which are premises, the third of which is the conclusion. Here is an example.

MAJOR PREMISE: The American buffalo is disappearing.
MINOR PREMISE: The Animal is an American buffalo.
CONCLUSION: Therefore, this animal is disappearing.

Once one has been indoctrinated into the mysteries of this arcane science, there is no statement he may not assert with complete confidence.

The main purpose of the author's argument is to

A) provide instruction in logic
B) supply a definition
C) cast doubt on the value of formal logic.
D) present an argument for the protection of American buffalo.
E) show the precise relationship between the premises and the conclusion of his example.

Iâ€™ve two questions,

1. What is the meaning of â€œthere is no statement he may not assert with compete confidenceâ€
Re: Logic Instructor CR   [#permalink] 22 May 2006, 07:20
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Psychologists have just completed an extensive study of 1 03 May 2012, 18:03
1 I have the feeling that Manhattan GMAT CR is harder than the 6 01 Mar 2009, 07:39
I have been trying CR questions based on logic i.e. A 4 08 Feb 2008, 09:41
Which of the following is the most logical completion of the 7 06 Dec 2006, 21:12
Which of the following most logically completes the 0 13 Apr 2013, 15:07
Display posts from previous: Sort by