|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 03 Jul 2003
Posts: 716
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
4
[0], given: 0
|
Having just completed Introductory Logic 9, I feel competent [#permalink]
 23 Nov 2003, 13:00
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Having just completed Introductory Logic 9, I feel competent to instruct others in the intricacies of this wonderful discipline. Logic is concerned with correct reasoning in the form of syllogisms. A syllogism consists of three statements, two of which are premises, the third of which is the conclusion. Here is an example.
MAJOR PREMISE: The American buffalo is disappearing.
MINOR PREMISE: The Animal is an American buffalo.
CONCLUSION: Therefore, this animal is disappearing.
Once one has been indoctrinated into the mysteries of this arcane science, there is no statement he may not assert with complete confidence.
The main purpose of the author's argument is to
A) provide instruction in logic
B) supply a definition
C) cast doubt on the value of formal logic.
D) present an argument for the protection of American buffalo.
E) show the precise relationship between the premises and the conclusion of his example.
IтАЩve two questions,
1. What is the meaning of тАЬthere is no statement he may not assert with compete confidenceтАЭ
2. answer to the question and the underlying reasoning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Posts: 1356
Followers: 6
Kudos [?]:
17
[0], given: 0
|
Re: Logic Instructor CR [#permalink]
19 May 2006, 13:19
kpadma wrote: Having just completed Introductory Logic 9, I feel competent to instruct others in the intricacies of this wonderful discipline. Logic is concerned with correct reasoning in the form of syllogisms. A syllogism consists of three statements, two of which are premises, the third of which is the conclusion. Here is an example.
MAJOR PREMISE: The American buffalo is disappearing.
MINOR PREMISE: The Animal is an American buffalo.
CONCLUSION: Therefore, this animal is disappearing.
Once one has been indoctrinated into the mysteries of this arcane science, there is no statement he may not assert with complete confidence.
The main purpose of the author's argument is to
A) provide instruction in logic
B) supply a definition
C) cast doubt on the value of formal logic.
D) present an argument for the protection of American buffalo.
E) show the precise relationship between the premises and the conclusion of his example.
E. show the precise relationship between the premises and the conclusion of his example.
[quote] 1. What is the meaning of “there is no statement he may not assert with compete confidenceâ€
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 06 May 2006
Posts: 791
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
7
[0], given: 0
|
My vote goes to B.
A definition of 'Syllogism' has been given, with a supporting example, but no explanation of the example i.e. there is nothing that shows the 'the precise relationship between the premises and the conclusion of his example'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1134
Location: India
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
22
[0], given: 1
|
I'll also go with E.
The author gives the relationship between the premises and conclusion and on the basis of that states that ' there is no statement he may not assert with complete confidence '.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 811
Location: BULGARIA
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
6
[0], given: 0
|
Hmmm...I think it is A)
The main purpose of his argument is to provide instruction in logic. In his example the author gives an example of syllogism, which consists of 2 premises and a conclusion.
So think that the main purpose of his/her argument is instructive. or A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 15
Location: Indiana
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Re: Logic Instructor CR [#permalink]
20 May 2006, 05:30
[quote="kpadma"]Having just completed Introductory Logic 9, I feel competent to instruct others in the intricacies of this wonderful discipline. Logic is concerned with correct reasoning in the form of syllogisms. A syllogism consists of three statements, two of which are premises, the third of which is the conclusion. Here is an example.
MAJOR PREMISE: The American buffalo is disappearing.
MINOR PREMISE: The Animal is an American buffalo.
CONCLUSION: Therefore, this animal is disappearing.
Once one has been indoctrinated into the mysteries of this arcane science, there is no statement he may not assert with complete confidence.
The main purpose of the author's argument is to
A) provide instruction in logic
B) supply a definition
C) cast doubt on the value of formal logic.
D) present an argument for the protection of American buffalo.
E) show the precise relationship between the premises and the conclusion of his example.
I’ve two questions,
1. What is the meaning of “there is no statement he may not assert with compete confidenceâ€
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 666
Location: London
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
6
[0], given: 0
|
I go with B.
He is explaining the term Introductory Logic by giving a detailed explanation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 27
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Re: Logic Instructor CR [#permalink]
21 May 2006, 03:13
[quote="kpadma"]Having just completed Introductory Logic 9, I feel competent to instruct others in the intricacies of this wonderful discipline. Logic is concerned with correct reasoning in the form of syllogisms. A syllogism consists of three statements, two of which are premises, the third of which is the conclusion. "syllogisms is defined here "'Here is an example.
MAJOR PREMISE: The American buffalo is disappearing.
MINOR PREMISE: The Animal is an American buffalo.
CONCLUSION: Therefore, this animal is disappearing.
Once one has been indoctrinated into the mysteries of this arcane science, there is no statement he may not assert with complete confidence.
The main purpose of the author's argument is to
A) provide instruction in logic
B) supply a definition -- so i dont think B is the answer
C) cast doubt on the value of formal logic.
D) present an argument for the protection of American buffalo.
E) show the precise relationship between the premises and the conclusion of his example.
I’ve two questions,
1. What is the meaning of “there is no statement he may not assert with compete confidenceâ€
_________________
If not now WHEN !!
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1744
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
12
[0], given: 0
|
Will go with B here. The author is defining what logic is by giving examples and in conclusion saying its easy to apply in evry situation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 10 May 2006
Posts: 126
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 0
|
Re: Logic Instructor CR [#permalink]
22 May 2006, 08:20
[quote="kpadma"]Having just completed Introductory Logic 9, I feel competent to instruct others in the intricacies of this wonderful discipline. Logic is concerned with correct reasoning in the form of syllogisms. A syllogism consists of three statements, two of which are premises, the third of which is the conclusion. Here is an example.
MAJOR PREMISE: The American buffalo is disappearing.
MINOR PREMISE: The Animal is an American buffalo.
CONCLUSION: Therefore, this animal is disappearing.
Once one has been indoctrinated into the mysteries of this arcane science, there is no statement he may not assert with complete confidence.
The main purpose of the author's argument is to
A) provide instruction in logic
B) supply a definition
C) cast doubt on the value of formal logic.
D) present an argument for the protection of American buffalo.
E) show the precise relationship between the premises and the conclusion of his example.
I’ve two questions,
1. What is the meaning of “there is no statement he may not assert with compete confidenceâ€
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Logic Instructor CR
[#permalink]
22 May 2006, 08:20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|
close
