Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 16 Apr 2014, 00:00

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

He is not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
Joined: 19 Oct 2012
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [1] , given: 0

GMAT ToolKit User
He is not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and [#permalink] New post 07 Nov 2012, 15:57
1
This post received
KUDOS
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

53% (01:59) correct 46% (01:02) wrong based on 112 sessions
He is not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" than for his current show "Anger Management", Charles Sheen nevertheless left a successful legacy in the old show that continues to live on, and he gets honourable mentions, a feat very few stars of his era have been able to achieve.

A. He is not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" than for

B. Even though he is not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" as compared to

C. He has not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" as he is for

D. Not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" as he is for

E. Since he is not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" as he is for

Could you please solve this by Process of Elimination. Thanks in advance.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Jun 2011
Posts: 72
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 11

Re: He is not acclaimed as much for his old show [#permalink] New post 08 Nov 2012, 00:11
vivekv wrote:
Could you please solve this by Process of Elimination.

He is not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" than for his current show "Anger Management", Charles Sheen nevertheless left a successful legacy in the old show that continues to live on, and he gets honourable mentions, a feat very few stars of his era have been able to achieve.

A. He is not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" than for

B. Even though he is not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" as compared to

C. He has not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" as he is for

D. Not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" as he is for

E. Since he is not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" as he is for

Thanks in advance.


This question tests your knowledge on idiom. How did I get this? Well look at the underlined part, it has a comparison marker as much...so the correct idiom is as much as.
Elimination-A
B-the second as should be parallel and comparable to the 1st as which is a clause. [remember when as is used for comparison, it must be followed by a clause or prepositional phrase(eclipse)
C-has not....perfect tense not required. [ perfect tense usage in 4 scenarios 1. an action that started in past and continues to present 2. the effect is still true in present context 3. For indefinite period of time. 4. For Since and Within Phrases when used in respect of time]
D-Correct
E-Since usage is not correct [subordinator] connected with comparer "as". doesn't make sense. The second part of the sentence doesn't give any explanation.

Hope this helps. Lets Kudos
GMAT Pill Representative
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 346
Schools: LBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Followers: 114

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 4

Re: He is not acclaimed as much for his old show [#permalink] New post 08 Nov 2012, 04:29
Hi,

I will try and run through each side by side to help

He is not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" than for his current show "Anger Management", Charles Sheen nevertheless left a successful legacy in the old show that continues to live on, and he gets honourable mentions, a feat very few stars of his era have been able to achieve.

A. He is not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" than for. This is unidiomatic. The correct term is 'as much for.... as for'

B. Even though he is not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" as compared to. Again we have an unidiomatic phrase it should be 'as much for... as for'. The sentence is also clumsy and wordy.

C. He has not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" as he is for. Wrong tense, this is not an action in the past that is complete, here the acclaim is still happening

D. Not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" as he is for. Correct. Parralel and Idiomatic.

E. Since he is not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" as he is for. Since is odd here, it doesn't add anything and is actually incorrect. It makes the whole thing like a subordinate phrase, but here we have to ask subordinate for what?

Thanks in advance.
_________________

Former GMAT Pill student, now on staff. Used GMATPILL OG 12 and nothing else: 770 (48,48) & 6.0



... and more

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Dec 2011
Posts: 298
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 60 [0], given: 32

GMAT Tests User
Re: He is not acclaimed as much for his old show [#permalink] New post 08 Nov 2012, 04:34
plumber250 wrote:
Hi,

I will try and run through each side by side to help

He is not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" than for his current show "Anger Management", Charles Sheen nevertheless left a successful legacy in the old show that continues to live on, and he gets honourable mentions, a feat very few stars of his era have been able to achieve.

A. He is not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" than for. This is unidiomatic. The correct term is 'as much for.... as for'

B. Even though he is not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" as compared to. Again we have an unidiomatic phrase it should be 'as much for... as for'. The sentence is also clumsy and wordy.

C. He has not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" as he is for. This is not parallel, comparing him to his show

D. Not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" as he is for. Correct. Parralel and Idiomatic.

E. Since he is not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" as he is for. Since is odd here, it doesn't add anything and is actually incorrect. It makes the whole thing like a subordinate phrase, but here we have to ask subordinate for what?

Thanks in advance.


plumber250 - Can you please explain the parallelism in option C?

Not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" as he is for

here we have as much FOR HIS (a prep phrase) ..... as HE IS.... (clause)

Cheers
GMAT Pill Representative
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 346
Schools: LBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Followers: 114

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 4

Re: He is not acclaimed as much for his old show [#permalink] New post 08 Nov 2012, 04:39
Hi - you beat me to the edit, I pressed send too early - correct rationale now in my post.

Thanks
_________________

Former GMAT Pill student, now on staff. Used GMATPILL OG 12 and nothing else: 770 (48,48) & 6.0



... and more

Intern
Intern
Joined: 19 Oct 2012
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: He is not acclaimed as much for his old show [#permalink] New post 08 Nov 2012, 07:23
Thanks for your clarification,

FYI: E-gmat analysis.

A. He is not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" than for
Independent clauses connected using comma

B. Even though he is not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" as compared to
As much X as compared to Y - is incorrect idiom. Should be "as much X as Y"

C. He has not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" as he is for
Independent clauses connected using comma, as in A

D. Not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" as he is for
Open clause has been converted to a modifier, so connection issue is no longer present. :)

E. Since he is not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" as he is for
Changes the meaning of the sentence. Un-necessary and illogical causality has been introduced in the sentence.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Jul 2012
Posts: 165
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V28
GPA: 3.3
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 31

Re: He is not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and [#permalink] New post 09 Nov 2012, 07:38
He is not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" than for his current show "Anger Management", Charles Sheen nevertheless left a successful legacy in the old show that continues to live on, and he gets honourable mentions, a feat very few stars of his era have been able to achieve.

A. He is not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" than for : Incorrect. Idiom error. Correct Idiom is AS MUCH X AS Y

B. Even though he is not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" as compared to: Incorrect. Idiom error and even though is redundant as nevertheless in the non-underlined sentence communicates the contrast.

C. He has not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" as he is for: Incorrect. Parallelism error.

D. Not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" as he is for: Correct.

E. Since he is not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" as he is for: Incorrect. Since is not required and changes meaning.
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Status: Learning New Things.....
Affiliations: GmatClub
Joined: 21 Feb 2012
Posts: 875
Location: India
City: Pune
GPA: 3.4
WE: Business Development (Manufacturing)
Followers: 88

Kudos [?]: 527 [0], given: 697

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: He is not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and [#permalink] New post 02 Feb 2013, 10:21
Expert's post
A) Ungrammatical use as much …… than.. The first part of the sentence can not be an independent Clause since it is immediately followed by the main subject.

B) The first part of the sentence does not required the use of contrast word, as even though used in this case, because the second part has already created the contrast with the word nevertheless. Compared to is redundant and the structure as much for x as compared to y is awkward, wordy and perhaps ungrammatical.

C) he has incorrect because sentence does not require present perfect tense. The second part of the sentence starts with charles sheen ,the main subject, so the first part should be a modifying phrase and not an independent clause.

D) This choice correctly converts the the first part of the sentence in to a modifier. Other things fine, however the structure not acclaimed as much for x as he is for y does not satisfies the issue of concision. Experts, Please elaborate!

E) Since changes the intended meaning.
_________________

Articles Subject-Verb Agreement NEW!!

Practice Combinations and Probability | DS Combinations | PS Absolute Value and Modules | DS Absolute Value and Modules | Critical Combinatorics

Collection Critical Reasoning shortcuts and tips | OG Verbal Directory (OG 13 and OG Verbal 2)

Contributing to Each Other’s Learning!!!

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 1685
Followers: 388

Kudos [?]: 1526 [0], given: 25

GMAT Tests User
Re: He is not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and [#permalink] New post 11 Feb 2013, 10:55
Expert's post
NarentheIndian wrote:
D) This choice correctly converts the the first part of the sentence in to a modifier. Other things fine, however the structure not acclaimed as much for x as he is for y does not satisfies the issue of concision.[/b] Experts, Please elaborate!

Dear NarentheIndian,
I'm happy to help with this. :-)

Here is the correct OA version of the sentence:
(D) Not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" as he is for his current show "Anger Management", Charles Sheen nevertheless left a successful legacy in the old show that continues to live on, and he gets honourable mentions, a feat very few stars of his era have been able to achieve.

My friend, I would say --- concision is a tricky thing. In general, we would say a sentence lacks concision if there clearly is a shorter yet grammatically correct way to say the same thing. For example, if I were to say ---

Not having as much acclaim for being on his show that was older, namely "Two and a Half Men" ....

--- that CLEARLY lacks concision. It is very wordy, and the OA above is a much shorter and more elegant way to say it.

Just the fact that a sentence has many words doesn't mean that it lacks concision. You see, most GMAT SC sentences are very long sentences. Many of them, like this one, could easily be broken into two sentences -----

Charles Sheen is acclaimed not as much for his old show "Two and a Half Men" as for his current show "Anger Management". Nevertheless, he left a successful legacy in this old show that continues to live on, and he gets honourable mentions, a feat very few stars of his era have been able to achieve.

In real world writing, that's always an option, and for a sentence like this, the two-sentence solution might be the best. BUT, that's never an option within the constraints of GMAT SC --- one of the ground rules of GMAT SC is that we have to keep everything as a single sentence, and that makes for some very long sentences.

Once again, the fact that a sentence is long is no crime. It's only a problem, a violation of the principle of concision, if there's clearly another shorter and grammatically correct way to say the same thing. In other words, like so many other important GMAT ideas, "concision" is deeply contextual and not an absolute.

Does all this make sense?

Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Re: He is not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and   [#permalink] 11 Feb 2013, 10:55
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts By how much a trader mark his goods up if he has to make a venksune 3 09 Sep 2004, 00:21
New posts A has $20,000.00. He/she has two options to make his/her MA 9 26 Feb 2005, 17:22
New posts 2 If Jake loses 8 pounds, he will weigh twice as much as his sportypk 3 30 May 2008, 08:56
New posts Experts publish their posts in the topic If Jake loses 8 pounds, he will weigh twice as much as his Walkabout 1 07 Dec 2012, 04:08
New posts 5 The acclaimed writer said that his writing, which were power Zarrolou 7 12 Apr 2013, 00:17
Display posts from previous: Sort by

He is not acclaimed as much for his old show "Two and

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.