### Kellogg (no $$) vs Fuqua (half-tuition$$$) vs Darden (full-tuition $$) • 28% [116] • 13% [55] • 57% [231] Author Message TAGS: ### Hide Tags Intern Joined: 01 Feb 2012 Posts: 6 Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0 HELP: Kellogg (no$$) vs Fuqua (half $$) vs Darden (full$$) [#permalink] ### Show Tags 02 Mar 2012, 03:25 Hey guys, now that the business school application process is over, I happen to have some really fortunate school choices on the table. I was admitted to Darden (full-tuition scholarship), Fuqua (half-tuition scholarship), and Kellogg (no scholarship). Kellogg has long been my top choice program because I believe it provides me with the best career placement opportunities. Also, among the schools I was admitted to, it has the best brand reputation, and the best alumni network reach. However, with the significant scholarship awards I received from Fuqua and Darden I am incredibly torn as to what school to attend. I am not convinced that the benefits of attending Kellogg over Fuqua and Darden is what$60K - $100K. I am very worried about my ROI post-MBA. My background: I work for a non-management consulting firm and would love to break into a top management consulting firm post-MBA. Hopefully, one of the M/B/B's. From my research, it appears that Kellogg offers me the best opportunities to land an M/B/B job compared to the other schools, but there are really no guarantees. Overall, in my opinion, Kellogg has a meaningful edge in career placement across all industries. However, I know Fuqua and Darden do place a number of students at top management companies and some in M/B/B albeit to a much lesser degree. In addition, I am also interested in exploring other industries and seeing what else is out there while earning my MBA. In other words, I am not 100% set on only recruiting for management consulting jobs. From a cultural fit perspective, Kellogg and Fuqua will be perfect for me, less so at Darden. I found myself really fitting in well at both Kellogg and Fuqua. I loved the community vibes when I visited both schools, and the student community at both schools seemed to be a lot more fun and vibrant compared to Darden. Teaching style - I love the case method, but also will be perfectly fine with a mix of teaching styles. I would love to hear from you guys what you would do in this case. Please vote! I am so torn so an insights you can provide will be really helpful to me. Your perspectives will really help me. Many thanks! Intern Status: Who Dares Wins -SAS Joined: 17 May 2010 Posts: 31 Schools: NYU, Ross, GSB Chicago, Darden, Tuck Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 3 [2] , given: 16 Re: HELP: Kellogg (no $$) vs Fuqua (half$$) vs Darden (full $$) [#permalink] ### Show Tags 08 Mar 2012, 13:40 2 This post received KUDOS First of all, many many congrats! I hope, one day, to duplicate your success. Kellogg is my dream school now having said that, I would have to recommend Darden because of the full ride and and here's why: 1) You are attending a top tier school for free. The Ranking difference between Darden and Kellogg is trivial IMHO. The important point is that they belong to the same tier of the top 10-15 schools. Had the choice been between a full ride at a tier 2 school vs no money at a tier 1 school I would have recommended the tier 1 school. Moreover, the big guns come and recruit in both places. Darden has smaller classes therefore you have a better chance at standing out amongst your classmates. So what really matters is the b school debt and that difference can be pretty big. Remember 100k invested well in your early 30s will go much further than the investment you do later. Also, who knows you might find a more rewarding career that does not pay as much but is something you want to pursue. If that is the case then graduating with no debt will be a big big factor. Furthermore, I don't know if you are married but if your significant other finds a job in a town where you make slightly less vs a town where you make more but he or she does not get his or her dream job, Then you always have the option to shift since you wont be worried about the debt. I say this because I have seen this happen to more than one set of people. 2) The quality of professors is marginally better at Darden than Kellogg 3) I spent 4 years at Michigan and am well versed with the winters of the midwest. Chicago is as bad if not worse than Ann Arbor. The winters arent pretty and can make you miserable. Besides if you end up working for an M/B/B then you will more likely than not wind up in a big city like Boston, NYC, CHI etc. Ofcourse these are from my point of view. You may be a polar bear or an eskimo who is not deterred by the winters and want the big city life of Chicago (which is a fantastic city when the temperature is above freezing) which will be markedly different than the life in the more rural C-ville. I hope this helps and once again many congrats! _________________ Champions aren't made in the gyms. Champions are made from something they have deep inside them -- a desire, a dream, a vision. Last edited by TandooriKnight on 08 Mar 2012, 13:54, edited 2 times in total. Manager Affiliations: CFA Joined: 03 Sep 2009 Posts: 61 Location: United States Concentration: Economics, Finance GMAT 1: 760 Q V GPA: 3.8 Followers: 2 Kudos [?]: 17 [2] , given: 7 Re: HELP: Kellogg (no$$) vs Fuqua (half $$) vs Darden (full$$) [#permalink] ### Show Tags 29 Mar 2012, 11:10 2 This post received KUDOS maki04q wrote: 100K is nothing down the road... I've heard this argument many times and it drives me crazy. Anyone with a financial calculator could argue that far enough down the road, any amount of money is virtually nothing. But you're not talking about incurring a$100,000 expense "down the road", you're talking about incurring it now, along with the opportunity cost of 2 years out of the workforce. Thinking practically, it will have a major impact on your lifestyle, possibly delaying major personal goals like owning a home or starting a family. That will be true even if you get a lucrative job after graduation. And consider the risk you're exposed to if things don't go as planned and you don't get that lucrative job. Remember student debt can't be shed in bankruptcy.
Manager
Joined: 17 Oct 2011
Posts: 241
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 720 Q51 V36
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 92 [1] , given: 36

### Show Tags

02 Mar 2012, 21:28
At the end of the day it is your decision.

However, I feel that business school is a financial matter as well as a professional aspiration. Given that UVA gave you a full tuition scholarship, that should be motivation for you to go there and consider it. It is a top rated program like Duke and Kellogg.

In regards to student culture, I don't think there is that drastic of a difference between one place and another. The guys you bump into in a class visit may or may not be your type but you want to at least observe some guys elsewhere and see how they interact, etc., which is what I did in my visits.

In regards to employer choice, if you are dead set on mgmt consulting, then maybe you should consider Kellogg if you feel that going there will open that door much wider for you. However, at the end of the day, all these employers are going to go to Chicago, Durham, and C-Ville, and if you kick butt in the on-campus interviews, then you will ultimately get an offer. All three schools are elite, though yes Kellogg is the best of the three. However, the full tuition scholarship at UVA is something you just can't turn down easily.

(For whatever reason, I just can't call UVA Darden like it's second nature. It's easier for me to say UVA.)
Intern
Joined: 05 Dec 2011
Posts: 49
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 4

### Show Tags

05 Mar 2012, 00:54
A full-scholarship to Darden would be really tough to turn down...although it seems like Fuqua provides a good compromise (less debt than Kellogg, better fit than Darden).
Founder
Affiliations: AS - Gold, HH-Diamond
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 14235
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.5
Followers: 3652

Kudos [?]: 22434 [0], given: 4450

### Show Tags

07 Mar 2012, 12:21
Congrats!

Additionally, if you go to Darden, you'll stand-out more, so it may be easier for you in interviews, classes, etc. Plus you can always say that you got in Kellogg but then rejected them because you decided to save $100k (+ interest) and take the full-ride you got to Darden! I'm facing a similar decision right now with different schools. Full ride is a full ride. Intern Joined: 14 Mar 2012 Posts: 5 Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1 Re: HELP: Kellogg (no $$) vs Fuqua (half$$) vs Darden (full $$) [#permalink] ### Show Tags 20 Mar 2012, 21:16 it sounds like you want to work for M/B/B, is that right? If so, than Kellogg is best of the three. That's practically unarguable. However, 100,000 is probably better tradeoff and you can still end up at one of those but they just don't back up the truck like they do at Kellogg. You are blessed. I'd say Darden. It's amazing school and the gen. mgmt education is top in world. Director Status: Go Blue! Joined: 03 Jun 2010 Posts: 685 Location: United States (MO) Concentration: Nonprofit, General Management Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2015 GMAT 1: 740 Q47 V45 GRE 1: 336 Q169 V167 GPA: 3.22 WE: Information Technology (Manufacturing) Followers: 16 Kudos [?]: 147 [0], given: 249 Re: HELP: Kellogg (no$$) vs Fuqua (half $$) vs Darden (full$$) [#permalink] ### Show Tags 21 Mar 2012, 05:57 I voted Darden too! I could see an argument for Kellogg, but I don't understand any of the votes for Fuqua in this situation. Intern Joined: 05 Feb 2007 Posts: 15 Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship Schools: Booth '14 (M) GMAT 1: 740 Q V GPA: 3.9 WE: Consulting (Consulting) Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0 Re: HELP: Kellogg (no $$) vs Fuqua (half$$) vs Darden (full $$) [#permalink] ### Show Tags 29 Mar 2012, 11:28 Congratulations on these offers! I would choose Kellogg because I believe the MBA is an important personal investment that will pay dividends over one's entire career. While the short-term monetary incentives may look enticing now, I would take a longer-term perspective. For the most part, Kellogg has the better brand, better networks, location, alumni relations, education etc. Senior Manager Joined: 12 Jan 2012 Posts: 273 Location: In Limbo Concentration: Finance GMAT 1: 760 Q48 V46 GPA: 3.72 WE: Consulting (Consulting) Followers: 3 Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 10 Re: HELP: Kellogg (no$$) vs Fuqua (half $$) vs Darden (full$$) [#permalink] ### Show Tags 11 Apr 2012, 14:11 Kellogg is a great school, but I'm not really sure I agree with the argument that it is head and shoulders above Darden for recruiting. Kellogg places more people at M/B/B because the class size is twice as big. I also would say that Kellogg and Darden's alumni networks are similarly strong (as our career services). Both schools are quite similar culturally in that students generally have great experiences and as such are very active alumni. Again, Kellogg has more alumni but on a person for person basis both groups are very strong. Upon acceptance, I spoke with a Darden second year who has an offer from McKinsey (in Chicago no less) and she said the school recruited very well at M/B/B this year. Go to Kellogg if you think it's the best fit, but there is no way Kellogg is worth$100k more than Darden based on job prospects. As has been said Darden is solidly a top 15 school (and top 10 according to some). Kellogg likewise is a top 10 school (and top 5 according to some). I'm not sure the difference this far up the ladder (when one school involved is not Harvard or Stanford) means much.

I would also note that as has been said a degree from a top school does not guarantee anything. Look at the law school bubble to see that.

Plus It's not like a company looks at every Kellogg student before moving onto Darden. If you are good enough to get a final round interview from M/B/B you will be on equal ground with other candidates. The big difference may be that more K students get these final round interviews, but of course there also are more people applying for these spots.

I personally have an admit from Darden with a half ride and am wait listed 3 other places. It will be a tough choice for me at all these places if I get in off a wait list (and with a full ride the choice would be a lot simpler).

In either case I think your choice is K vs Darden. I wouldn't even consider Duke at this point (of course I prefered Darden to Duke from day 1).
Manager
Joined: 05 Nov 2009
Posts: 128
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
GMAT 1: 700 Q V
WE: Management Consulting (Consulting)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 67

Re: HELP: Kellogg (no $$) vs Fuqua (half$$) vs Darden (full $$) [#permalink] ### Show Tags 21 Oct 2012, 06:19 fs007, what a nice problem to have. Congrats. So which school did you end up deciding to attend? Re: HELP: Kellogg (no$$) vs Fuqua (half $$) vs Darden (full$$)   [#permalink] 21 Oct 2012, 06:19

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 23 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
McCombs ($) vs Owen (FULL) vs Darden ($) and Fuqua 0 21 Dec 2015, 14:24
Fuqua vs. Darden vs. Ross 6 24 Mar 2015, 13:18