Here goes... Let's say you take the Quant section of the : Quant Question Archive [LOCKED]
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 17 Jan 2017, 12:35

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Here goes... Let's say you take the Quant section of the

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 10 Jun 2003
Posts: 210
Location: Maryland
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Here goes... Let's say you take the Quant section of the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Aug 2003, 07:59
This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

Here goes...

Let's say you take the Quant section of the GMAT and get 33/37 correct. Now after the test is done, you find out that 5 of the 37 are "trial questions" that do not count. What are the chances that you got a perfect score on this section?
SVP
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1603
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 245 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Aug 2003, 22:35
A cool problem. I have thought half an hour what to do.
You score perfect if all your wrong answers (4) are not counted (5).
In other words, for 5 noncounted units, 4 should be wrong plus one correct.

favorable outcomes: 4C4 (4 wrong answers)*33С1 (1 correct)
total 37C5

33/37C5=33*32!*5!/37!=1/17*7*3*37=1/13209

a sanity check: the smallest probability to score perfect is the case when 4 questions are not counted, we have 5, so the probability should be very small

When such a probability is any seizable? Let us imagine that 15 questions are not counted. Answering 33/37, we should have far more chances to score perfect. 4C4*33C11/37C15=0.02

GMAT Instructor
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 770
Location: New York NY 10024
Schools: Haas, MFE; Anderson, MBA; USC, MSEE
Followers: 25

Kudos [?]: 205 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Aug 2003, 22:49
stolyar wrote:
A cool problem. I have thought half an hour what to do.
You score perfect if all your wrong answers (4) are not counted (5).
In other words, for 5 noncounted units, 4 should be wrong plus one correct.

favorable outcomes: 4C4 (4 wrong answers)*33С1 (1 correct)
total 37C5

33/37C5=33*32!*5!/37!=1/17*7*3*37=1/13209

a sanity check: the smallest probability to score perfect is the case when 4 questions are not counted, we have 5, so the probability should be very small

When such a probability is any seizable? Let us imagine that 15 questions are not counted. Answering 33/37, we should have far more chances to score perfect. 4C4*33C11/37C15=0.02

This question is a little ambiguous. Your answer assumes that it is equally likely that you will miss an experimental question as a real one. But is that really true? I would think that the experimental question are somewhat more difficult, hence ETS needs to test them to determine whether they are fair, unambiguous, solvable, etc.... If the chance that you will miss an experimental question is significantly higher than a real one, it would raise the probability of increasing your score. However, since we have no data regarding the relative difficulty of real vs. experimental questions, I don't think you can calculate an answer.
_________________

Best,

AkamaiBrah
Former Senior Instructor, Manhattan GMAT and VeritasPrep
Vice President, Midtown NYC Investment Bank, Structured Finance IT
MFE, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley, Class of 2005
MBA, Anderson School of Management, UCLA, Class of 1993

SVP
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1603
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 245 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Aug 2003, 23:17
I felt the same ambiguity. Yet, I hope the approach is relevant, at least partly.
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 770
Location: New York NY 10024
Schools: Haas, MFE; Anderson, MBA; USC, MSEE
Followers: 25

Kudos [?]: 205 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2003, 00:30
stolyar wrote:
I felt the same ambiguity. Yet, I hope the approach is relevant, at least partly.

As I stated, your approach is exactly correct under the given assumption. However, bad assumption is almost always equal to bad result.
_________________

Best,

AkamaiBrah
Former Senior Instructor, Manhattan GMAT and VeritasPrep
Vice President, Midtown NYC Investment Bank, Structured Finance IT
MFE, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley, Class of 2005
MBA, Anderson School of Management, UCLA, Class of 1993

Intern
Joined: 19 Aug 2003
Posts: 1
Location: Upstate New York
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Herez my 2 cents worth [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2003, 20:14
Herez my 2 cents worth. I think the probability of getting a perfect score is 25%.
Reason? Total chances for scoring 33/37

Excuse my abbreviations
OTCS -- Outside trial correct score
TCS -- Trial correct score x/5
TWS -- Trial wrong score y/5
OTWS -- Outside trial wrong score

OTCS -- TCS -- TWS -- OTWS
1) 32--1--4--0
2) 31--1--3--1
3) 30--1--2--2
4) 29--1--3--4

So there are 4 possibilities that YOUr score is distrubuted among the Trial and non-Trials.

Case 1 only yieds a perfect score. Meaning no one can score above 32/37.

Therefore the chances of YOU getting a perfect score despite the trial questions are 25%.

Let me know if I was ignorant of any fact that was obvious.
Thanks
Chaitram
Manager
Joined: 10 Jun 2003
Posts: 210
Location: Maryland
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Re: Herez my 2 cents worth [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2003, 07:16
chaitramasam wrote:
Herez my 2 cents worth. I think the probability of getting a perfect score is 25%.
Reason? Total chances for scoring 33/37

Excuse my abbreviations
OTCS -- Outside trial correct score
TCS -- Trial correct score x/5
TWS -- Trial wrong score y/5
OTWS -- Outside trial wrong score

OTCS -- TCS -- TWS -- OTWS
1) 32--1--4--0
2) 31--1--3--1
3) 30--1--2--2
4) 29--1--3--4

So there are 4 possibilities that YOUr score is distrubuted among the Trial and non-Trials.

Case 1 only yieds a perfect score. Meaning no one can score above 32/37.

Therefore the chances of YOU getting a perfect score despite the trial questions are 25%.

Let me know if I was ignorant of any fact that was obvious.
Thanks
Chaitram

My take on this (AkBrah, let's assume all prob is equal)..

There are 37C5 ways that the "trial questions" can be distributed.

33C1 of them will include the four that you got wrong.

Prob is 33C1/37C5.
Intern
Joined: 19 Aug 2003
Posts: 6
Location: Pittsburgh
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2003, 22:45
As mentioned by AkamaiBrah, the difficulty level of the trial question will influence the outcome of answering a trial question right, in reality. Ignoring this fact for a moment,

We have 33 correct answers out of 37. 4 incorrect answers. 5 of those 37 questions are trial questions.

We can approach the problem in two ways, first (as stolyar approached),

33 correct answers, 4 wrong answers - choose 5 trial questions among them. Lets find out the probability of all 4 wrong answers being that of the trial questions.

p = (4 wrong being trial * one correct being trial )/ (choosing 5 trial from 37)
p = 4C4 * 33C1/37C5 = 1 *33/435893 = 1/13209

Second approach is,

32 real questions, 5 trial questions; find the probability of 4 wrong answers being that of the trial questions. [32 red balls, 5 blue balls - find the probability of 4 balls chosen being blue]

p = 5C4/37C4 = 5/66045 = 1/13209
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 770
Location: New York NY 10024
Schools: Haas, MFE; Anderson, MBA; USC, MSEE
Followers: 25

Kudos [?]: 205 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Aug 2003, 00:56
bnagasub wrote:
As mentioned by AkamaiBrah, the difficulty level of the trial question will influence the outcome of answering a trial question right, in reality. Ignoring this fact for a moment,

We have 33 correct answers out of 37. 4 incorrect answers. 5 of those 37 questions are trial questions.

We can approach the problem in two ways, first (as stolyar approached),

33 correct answers, 4 wrong answers - choose 5 trial questions among them. Lets find out the probability of all 4 wrong answers being that of the trial questions.

p = (4 wrong being trial * one correct being trial )/ (choosing 5 trial from 37)
p = 4C4 * 33C1/37C5 = 1 *33/435893 = 1/13209

Second approach is,

32 real questions, 5 trial questions; find the probability of 4 wrong answers being that of the trial questions. [32 red balls, 5 blue balls - find the probability of 4 balls chosen being blue]

p = 5C4/37C4 = 5/66045 = 1/13209

Consider this simple approach:

He got four wrong. The chances of him getting any particular four questions wrong are the same so we can focus on just these four questions. He needs to match all four wrong answers with experimental questions, of which there are 5 in 37.

p = 5/37 * 4/36 * 3/35 * 2/34 = 1/13209
_________________

Best,

AkamaiBrah
Former Senior Instructor, Manhattan GMAT and VeritasPrep
Vice President, Midtown NYC Investment Bank, Structured Finance IT
MFE, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley, Class of 2005
MBA, Anderson School of Management, UCLA, Class of 1993

Manager
Joined: 10 Jun 2003
Posts: 210
Location: Maryland
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Re: Herez my 2 cents worth [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Aug 2003, 05:24
mciatto wrote:
My take on this (AkBrah, let's assume all prob is equal)..

There are 37C5 ways that the "trial questions" can be distributed.

33C1 of them will include the four that you got wrong.

Prob is 33C1/37C5.

Just for the record, 33C1/37C5 = 1/13209.

Love finding more than one way to do a problem!!
Re: Herez my 2 cents worth   [#permalink] 21 Aug 2003, 05:24
Display posts from previous: Sort by