Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 12 Jul 2014, 16:14

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

High levels of fertilizer and pesticides, needed when

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 83
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

High levels of fertilizer and pesticides, needed when [#permalink] New post 04 Mar 2005, 22:50
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (low)

Question Stats:

80% (02:23) correct 20% (01:40) wrong based on 145 sessions
Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review, 2nd Edition

Practice Question
Question No.: 64
Page: 142
Difficulty:


High levels of fertilizer and pesticides, needed when farmers try to produce high yields of the same crop year after year, pollute water supplies. Experts therefore urge farmers to diversify their crops and to rotate their plantings yearly.

To receive governmental price-support benefits for a crop, farmers must have produced that same crop for the past several years.

The statement above, if true, best support which of the following conclusions?


A: The rules for governmental support of farm prices work against efforts to reduce water pollution.
B: The only solution to the problem of water pollution from fertilizers and pesticides is to take farmland out of production.
C: Farmers can continue to make a profit by rotating diverse crops, thus reducing costs for chemicals, but not by planting the same crop each year.
D: New farming techniques will be developed to make it possible for farmers to reduce the application of fertilizers and pesticides.
E: Governmental price supports for farm products are set at levels that are not high enough to allow farmers to get out of debt.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Best regards,

Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesKnewton GMAT Discount CodesManhattan GMAT Discount Codes
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 1493
Location: Germany
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 05 Mar 2005, 00:46
how can you deduce D ? the conclusion bases on the evidence. in the argument there is no hint that new farming techniques will be developed. in fact there are two kinds of evidence that support the conclusion. a important rule is that you sticky close to the argument and that you dont infer or deduce too much.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 83
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 05 Mar 2005, 21:19
Hello Christoph,
Thank you for your response. I now see why (A) is correct, but let me respond to you the reason why I initially picked up (D).

In order to continue to receive the price-support benefits from the government, you need to keep producing the same crop. However, you will then conflict the water pollution.

Therefore, in order to achive both objectives(receive the governmental price-support & deal with less water pollution), the conclusion I took was to develop new farming techniques which is Choice (D).

What do you think of? Thank you for your kind response.


christoph wrote:
how can you deduce D ? the conclusion bases on the evidence. in the argument there is no hint that new farming techniques will be developed. in fact there are two kinds of evidence that support the conclusion. a important rule is that you sticky close to the argument and that you dont infer or deduce too much.

_________________

Best regards,

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 854
Location: Hyderabad
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 05 Mar 2005, 23:45
but...A also assumes that "several years" would mean..several past continuous years!..but is probably the best of the lot!

(I picked C..but then, there is nothing mentioned abt. revenues etc...as given in the OG explanation..)
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Posts: 728
Location: Milwaukee
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 06 Mar 2005, 10:05
A: The rules for governmental support of farm prices work against efforts to reduce water pollution.
Correctly concludes based on info given

B: The only solution to the problem of water pollution from fertilizers and pesticides is to take farmland out of production.

only solution is too extreme and is not mentioned in the arguement

C: Farmers can continue to make a profit by rotating diverse crops, thus reducing costs for chemicals, but not by planting the same crop each year.

Infact farmers profit can be reduced because they can no longer plant to get "high yields of the same crop". Hence this is wrong

D: New farming techniques will be developed to make it possible for farmers to reduce the application of fertilizers and pesticides.
- Just a wishful thinking. Wishful thinkings are not allowed in CR

E: Governmental price supports for farm products are set at levels that are not high enough to allow farmers to get out of debt.
There is no mention of farmers debt anywhere. Hence out of context
_________________

Praveen

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jun 2006
Posts: 113
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Fertilizers n Pesticides [#permalink] New post 08 Nov 2006, 19:27
High levels of fertilizer and pesticides, needed when farmers try to produce high yield of the same crop year after year, pollute water supplies. Experts therefore urge farmers to diversify their crops and to rotate their plantings yearly.
To receive governmental price-support benefits for a crop, farmers must have produced that same crop for the past several years.
The statements above, if true, best support which of the following conclusions?
(A) The rules for governmental support of farm prices work against efforts to reduce water pollution.
(B) The only solution to the problem of water pollution from fertilizers and pesticides is to take farmland out of production.
(C) Farmers can continue to make a profit by rotating diverse crops, thus reducing costs for chemicals, but not by planting the same crop each year.
(D) New farming techniques will be developed to make it possible for farmers to reduce the application of fertilizers and pesticides.
(E) Governmental price supports for farm products are set at levels that are not high enough to allow farmers to get out of debt.
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5253
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 120 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
 [#permalink] New post 08 Nov 2006, 19:30
Looks like a straightforward (A) here. There is an inherent contradiction in the needs of the farmers and the pollution levels caused by pesticides.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1136
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 08 Nov 2006, 19:31
A is the only that is ALWAYS true. The others need not be true.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 439
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 09 Nov 2006, 03:20
A....
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 148
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 09 Nov 2006, 03:25
without doubt A
_________________

Neelabh Mahesh

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Aug 2005
Posts: 415
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 09 Nov 2006, 10:28
A ....
All other are out of scope....or not supported
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Posts: 139
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 09 Nov 2006, 12:42
A is what must be true from only the paragraph
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Sep 2011
Posts: 206
GMAT 1: Q V
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 5

GMAT Tests User
Re: Fertilizers n Pesticides [#permalink] New post 24 Mar 2012, 14:45
I have chosen A for this question:

The passage has 2 paragraphs. The first states the need to diversify crops to reduce water pollution and the second states the rules for government support. The two statements clash because in order to receive government support, the farmers must produce the same crop for several years, but by doing so, there is water pollution.

A. This statement is a combination of both paragraphs and is the correct answer.

B. We don't know that "the only solution..." is true. It could be that there are many different solutions, so this may or may not be true. Therefore, it is incorrect.

C. How can we be sure that farmers will still be making a profit? It could be that the government support is the only thing that allows farmers to profit and without it, they are losing money even if we include the reduction in chemical costs. Therefore, this statement cannot be proven from the passage and is incorrect.

D. This statement brings in outside information - this is incorrect.

E. Again, this statement cannot be proven from the passage. It may or may not be true, therefore this statement is incorrect.
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Posts: 20
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V29
GMAT 2: 710 Q51 V34
GPA: 3.9
WE: Project Management (Computer Software)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 8

Re: Fertilizers n Pesticides [#permalink] New post 11 Aug 2012, 03:33
How can the solution be A!!?

The first paragraph says that water pollution occurs when farmers try to produce 'high' yields of crop year after year.
In second paragraph, though the rules for governmental support says farmer must have produced the same crop for several years, they never say farmer must have produced them in high yields!
Putting the two together, the governmental support rules do not work against efforts to reduce water pollution. A farmer can produce same crop, year after year, in normal yields and can get the support benefit without increasing any pollution. Option 'A' doesnt seem correct.

Can someone provide their comments...

Thanks.
Expert Post
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jun 2012
Posts: 73
Location: United States
Schools: UCSD (Rady) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 181

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 3

Re: Fertilizers n Pesticides [#permalink] New post 11 Aug 2012, 07:50
Expert's post
koolpaari wrote:
How can the solution be A!!?

The first paragraph says that water pollution occurs when farmers try to produce 'high' yields of crop year after year.
In second paragraph, though the rules for governmental support says farmer must have produced the same crop for several years, they never say farmer must have produced them in high yields!
Putting the two together, the governmental support rules do not work against efforts to reduce water pollution. A farmer can produce same crop, year after year, in normal yields and can get the support benefit without increasing any pollution. Option 'A' doesnt seem correct.

Can someone provide their comments...

Thanks.


Interesting point! However, we also need to consider the second sentence in the context of the first. Let me rephrase the argument:

Experts urge farmers to diversify their crops and to rotate their plantings yearly because some farmers pollute the water when they plant the same crop every year. To receive governmental price-support benefits for a crop, farmers must have produced that same crop for the past several years.

See how I've combined two sentences into one here? Now it's clear why (A) is correct.

The trick I used, though, is that I didn't assume that all farmers try and produce high yield crops. And in fact, we don't need to assume that to arrive at conclusion (A). We just need to assume that some farmers try and produce high yield crops, which I would consider safe even if unstated. The "high yield" stipulation is, therefore, just a distraction.
_________________

Ryan Jacobs | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | San Francisco

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Posts: 20
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V29
GMAT 2: 710 Q51 V34
GPA: 3.9
WE: Project Management (Computer Software)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 8

Re: Fertilizers n Pesticides [#permalink] New post 11 Aug 2012, 10:58
rjacobsMGMAT wrote:
koolpaari wrote:
How can the solution be A!!?

The first paragraph says that water pollution occurs when farmers try to produce 'high' yields of crop year after year.
In second paragraph, though the rules for governmental support says farmer must have produced the same crop for several years, they never say farmer must have produced them in high yields!
Putting the two together, the governmental support rules do not work against efforts to reduce water pollution. A farmer can produce same crop, year after year, in normal yields and can get the support benefit without increasing any pollution. Option 'A' doesnt seem correct.

Can someone provide their comments...

Thanks.


Interesting point! However, we also need to consider the second sentence in the context of the first. Let me rephrase the argument:

Experts urge farmers to diversify their crops and to rotate their plantings yearly because some farmers pollute the water when they plant the same crop every year. To receive governmental price-support benefits for a crop, farmers must have produced that same crop for the past several years.

See how I've combined two sentences into one here? Now it's clear why (A) is correct.

The trick I used, though, is that I didn't assume that all farmers try and produce high yield crops. And in fact, we don't need to assume that to arrive at conclusion (A). We just need to assume that some farmers try and produce high yield crops, which I would consider safe even if unstated. The "high yield" stipulation is, therefore, just a distraction.


Thanks Ryan. The modified argument makes complete sense.
My exam is now less than 10 days away and I am still struggling a lot with inference questions. Distraction, like the one above, is the last thing I will need during the exam. :(
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Apr 2013
Posts: 8
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

Interesting CR Prob from Official Verbal Review (Modified) [#permalink] New post 19 Jan 2014, 23:34
High levels of fertilizer and pesticides, needed when farmers try to produce high yields of the same crop year after year, pollute water supplies. Experts therefore urge farmers to diversify their crops and to rotate their plantings yearly.
To receive governmental price-supportbenefits for a crop, farmers must have produced that same crop for the past several years.
The statements above, if true, best support which of the following conclusions?

(Al The rules for governmental support of farm prices work against efforts to reduce water pollution.
(B) The only solution to the problemof water pollution from fertilizers and pesticides is to take farmland out of production.
(C) Farmers can continue to make a profit by rotating diverse crops, thus reducing costs for chemicals, but by planting the same crop each year.
(D) New farming techniques will be developed to make it possible for farmers to reduce the application of
fertilizers and pesticides.
(E) Governmental price supports for farm products are set at levels that are not high enough to allowfarmers
to get out of debt.

Please note that I have done a little modification in the answer choice C, in this case please provide your opinion can we consider C as correct answer.

Reasoning:
One may thing that farmers could have more than one crop and they can rotate the diversified "set of crops" that they have and in turn reduce fertiliser/pesticides. Because it is not mentioned that a farmer can only procure one crop/field, it may be possible that he may have a large area and where multiple crops caould be grown. By doing this they can still continue to grow a crop for more than 05 years and earn the government incentive too.

Last edited by vikasbansal227 on 20 Jan 2014, 23:02, edited 1 time in total.
Expert Post
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 2289
Followers: 230

Kudos [?]: 1972 [0], given: 669

Re: High levels of fertilizer and pesticides, needed when [#permalink] New post 20 Jan 2014, 07:35
Expert's post
Re: High levels of fertilizer and pesticides, needed when   [#permalink] 20 Jan 2014, 07:35
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Experts publish their posts in the topic Kaplan High level questions Alchemist123 2 27 Dec 2012, 19:37
The use of pesticides containing high levels of toxins is ExecMBA2010 16 20 Feb 2010, 19:57
Fertilizers n Pesticides girikorat 0 11 Aug 2012, 10:58
Pesticides nischalb 14 03 Nov 2006, 21:43
pesticide praveen_rao7 17 17 Mar 2005, 10:28
Display posts from previous: Sort by

High levels of fertilizer and pesticides, needed when

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.