Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 May 2013, 18:10
Customize  |  Hide

High School Principal: There is little doubt that

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2012
Posts: 188
GMAT Date: 11-18-2012
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 23

High School Principal: There is little doubt that [#permalink] New post 30 Dec 2012, 08:08
00:00

Question Stats:

50% (02:34) correct 50% (02:25) wrong based on 12 sessions
High School Principal: There is little doubt that extra-curricular activities such as sports teams waste the time students could better spend on academics. Close to half the students in this school barely passed the math and science portions of the graduation exam. Clearly, our attention needs to be refocused. In order to improve our school’s performance on the graduation exam, I propose that we discontinue all school sports beginning next year.

EACH of the following, if true, casts doubt on the principal’s conclusion that discontinuing school sports will improve academics EXCEPT

A)A surplus in last year’s school budget was spent on transportation for the football team rather than on buying a new available edition of the school’s science textbook.

B)Most members of school sports teams were in the half of students that easily passed the graduation exam.
C)The principal does not have a specific plan for re-focusing the school’s resources on academics.
D)The school’s math and science textbooks have been outdated for two years.
E)Even though the principal claims that half the school’s students “barely passed” the graduation exam, they did meet the state’s minimum requirements for graduation.


'C' states book is outdated for two years therefore we need to work on academic more to improve perfomance.
Hence 'C' strengthen the argument rather weaken.
Correct if my reasoning for option 'C' is wrong.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA After discussion

_________________

Thriving for CHANGE

Intern
Intern
Status: Winning is not everything, but wanting to win is
Joined: 10 Nov 2010
Posts: 34
WE 1: IT Consultant (6Yr)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 4

GMAT Tests User
Re: High School Principal: There is little doubt that extra-curr [#permalink] New post 30 Dec 2012, 08:40
Aristocrat wrote:
High School Principal: There is little doubt that extra-curricular activities such as sports teams waste the time students could better spend on academics. Close to half the students in this school barely passed the math and science portions of the graduation exam. Clearly, our attention needs to be refocused. In order to improve our school’s performance on the graduation exam, I propose that we discontinue all school sports beginning next year.

EACH of the following, if true, casts doubt on the principal’s conclusion that discontinuing school sports will improve academics EXCEPT

A)A surplus in last year’s school budget was spent on transportation for the football team rather than on buying a new available edition of the school’s science textbook.

B)Most members of school sports teams were in the half of students that easily passed the graduation exam.
C)The principal does not have a specific plan for re-focusing the school’s resources on academics.
D)The school’s math and science textbooks have been outdated for two years.
E)Even though the principal claims that half the school’s students “barely passed” the graduation exam, they did meet the state’s minimum requirements for graduation.


'C' states book is outdated for two years therefore we need to work on academic more to improve perfomance.
Hence 'C' strengthen the argument rather weaken.
Correct if my reasoning for option 'C' is wrong.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA After discussion



Hi Aristotle,

I feel A should be the answer for this one.Though a slight doubt on E.

Thanks
Jatin
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Dec 2012
Posts: 15
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 2
WE: Sales (Consumer Products)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: High School Principal: There is little doubt that extra-curr [#permalink] New post 31 Dec 2012, 03:36
IMO B. The stem is talking about the relationship of sports and low passing exam rate. The principle based his plan of discontinueing the sports on that sports is the cause of low acadamic performance. Only B, most sports members are among the half who pass the exams, suggests that extracurricular programs don't result in bad exam perfromance.

C is out of scope.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 22 Oct 2012
Posts: 6
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: High School Principal: There is little doubt that extra-curr [#permalink] New post 01 Jan 2013, 02:40
Aristocrat wrote:
High School Principal: There is little doubt that extra-curricular activities such as sports teams waste the time students could better spend on academics. Close to half the students in this school barely passed the math and science portions of the graduation exam. Clearly, our attention needs to be refocused. In order to improve our school’s performance on the graduation exam, I propose that we discontinue all school sports beginning next year.

EACH of the following, if true, casts doubt on the principal’s conclusion that discontinuing school sports will improve academics EXCEPT

A)A surplus in last year’s school budget was spent on transportation for the football team rather than on buying a new available edition of the school’s science textbook.

B)Most members of school sports teams were in the half of students that easily passed the graduation exam.
C)The principal does not have a specific plan for re-focusing the school’s resources on academics.
D)The school’s math and science textbooks have been outdated for two years.
E)Even though the principal claims that half the school’s students “barely passed” the graduation exam, they did meet the state’s minimum requirements for graduation.


'C' states book is outdated for two years therefore we need to work on academic more to improve perfomance.
Hence 'C' strengthen the argument rather weaken.
Correct if my reasoning for option 'C' is wrong.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA After discussion


IMO A

B)As most of the members are already performing well,net effect won't be much
C)Principal has the idea but no planning ,this can hamper the chances of the plan being a success
D)As text books are outdated,even if sports members are made to study them,net effect won't be as desired
E)Poses a threat to the argument.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Posts: 15
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 9

Re: High School Principal: There is little doubt that extra-curr [#permalink] New post 17 Jan 2013, 17:29
abctongji wrote:
IMO B. The stem is talking about the relationship of sports and low passing exam rate. The principle based his plan of discontinueing the sports on that sports is the cause of low acadamic performance. Only B, most sports members are among the half who pass the exams, suggests that extracurricular programs don't result in bad exam perfromance.

C is out of scope.


That means B weakens the principals conclusion. The questions asks which option does not. I choose A because if more funds are allocated towards sports than books, and test scores are low, the principals findings are supported.
Intern
Intern
Status: pursuing a dream
Joined: 02 Jun 2011
Posts: 46
Schools: MIT Sloan (LGO)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 7

CAT Tests
Re: High School Principal: There is little doubt that extra-curr [#permalink] New post 27 Jan 2013, 04:19
bugzor wrote:
abctongji wrote:
IMO B. The stem is talking about the relationship of sports and low passing exam rate. The principle based his plan of discontinueing the sports on that sports is the cause of low acadamic performance. Only B, most sports members are among the half who pass the exams, suggests that extracurricular programs don't result in bad exam perfromance.

C is out of scope.


That means B weakens the principals conclusion. The questions asks which option does not. I choose A because if more funds are allocated towards sports than books, and test scores are low, the principals findings are supported.


The principal supports that "our attention" (from School pov) needs to be refocused.

A) If the money spent on sports was a surplus, it was not affecting academics. Casts doubt.
B) The principal complains that half of the students did bad because of sports, but this premise clearly contradicts it. Casts doubt.
C) Without a plan, refocusing would serve to no avail. Casts doubt.
D) Correct. The math and science textbooks may be outdated because not enough attention has been put in updating them.
E) Are the Principal's standards different to those of the State? Who is right? Casts doubt.

Almost one month has passed. OA please.
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 07 May 2012
Posts: 39
Location: United States
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 12

CAT Tests
Re: High School Principal: There is little doubt that [#permalink] New post 18 May 2013, 07:01
Aristocrat wrote:
High School Principal: There is little doubt that extra-curricular activities such as sports teams waste the time students could better spend on academics. Close to half the students in this school barely passed the math and science portions of the graduation exam. Clearly, our attention needs to be refocused. In order to improve our school’s performance on the graduation exam, I propose that we discontinue all school sports beginning next year.

EACH of the following, if true, casts doubt on the principal’s conclusion that discontinuing school sports will improve academics EXCEPT

A)A surplus in last year’s school budget was spent on transportation for the football team rather than on buying a new available edition of the school’s science textbook.

B)Most members of school sports teams were in the half of students that easily passed the graduation exam.
C)The principal does not have a specific plan for re-focusing the school’s resources on academics.
D)The school’s math and science textbooks have been outdated for two years.
E)Even though the principal claims that half the school’s students “barely passed” the graduation exam, they did meet the state’s minimum requirements for graduation.


'C' states book is outdated for two years therefore we need to work on academic more to improve perfomance.
Hence 'C' strengthen the argument rather weaken.
Correct if my reasoning for option 'C' is wrong.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA After discussion



Appreciate a GREAT DEAL , if you can post the OA , for the benefit of others.
Re: High School Principal: There is little doubt that   [#permalink] 18 May 2013, 07:01
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts The school principal insisted that student failures are chiragr 8 01 May 2006, 10:21
New posts High School Principal: There is little doubt that ISB2011 8 01 May 2010, 23:49
Popular new posts 3 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC The school principal noboru 25 22 Oct 2010, 10:13
New posts The principal of a public elementary school complained bschool83 5 09 Jul 2011, 13:41
New posts 1 The school principal insisted that student failures are joylive 2 04 Nov 2012, 09:05
Display posts from previous: Sort by

High School Principal: There is little doubt that

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.