Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Historian: In the Drindian Empire, censuses were conducted [#permalink]
20 Sep 2004, 06:55
0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Historian: In the Drindian Empire, censuses were conducted annually to determine the population of each village. Village census records for the last half of the 1600â€™s are remarkably complete. This very completeness makes one point stand out; in five different years, villages overwhelmingly reported significant population declines. Tellingly, each of those five years immediately followed an increase in a certain Drindian tax. This tax, which was assessed on villages, was computed by the central government using the annual census figures. Obviously, whenever the tax went up, villages had an especially powerful economic incentive to minimize the number of people they recorded; and concealing the size of a villageâ€™s population from government census takers would have been easy. Therefore, it is reasonable to think that the reported declines did not happen. In the historianâ€™s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
K. The first supplies a context for the historianâ€™s argument; the second acknowledges a consideration that has been used to argue against the position the historian seeks to establish.
L. The first presents evidence to support the position that the historian seeks to establish; the second acknowledges a consideration that has been used to argue against that position.
M. The first provides a context for certain evidence that supports the position that the historian seeks to establish; the second is that position.
N. The first is a position for which the historian argues; the second is an assumption that serves as the basis of that argument.
O. The first is an assumption that the historian explicitly makes in arguing for a certain position; the second acknowledges a consideration that calls that assumption into question.
M it is
historian position: it is not true that population increased(historian's position as mentioned by 2nd BF) despite given evidence(remarkable accuracy of 1600's census records) because of the reasons given _________________
M it is historian position: it is not true that population increased(historian's position as mentioned by 2nd BF) despite given evidence(remarkable accuracy of 1600's census records) because of the reasons given
Although I also chose "M"...as none other was a better option, still option "M" says "certain evidence that supports the position"....on the contrary the evidence doesn't support the author's position...it contradicts it ?
Hence POE => L or M
Second one is the position historian is trying to come at.
M wins. _________________
"Forums are meant to benefit all. No one is interested in knowing what your guesses are. Please explain the reasoning behind the answer you chose. This will also help you organize your thoughts quickly during the exam."
Check out this awesome article about Anderson on Poets Quants, http://poetsandquants.com/2015/01/02/uclas-anderson-school-morphs-into-a-friendly-tech-hub/ . Anderson is a great place! Sorry for the lack of updates recently. I...