Historian: In the Drindian Empire, censuses were conducted : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 20 Jan 2017, 14:49

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Historian: In the Drindian Empire, censuses were conducted

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 751
Location: Dallas, Texas
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 145 [0], given: 0

Historian: In the Drindian Empire, censuses were conducted [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2006, 17:17
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Historian: In the Drindian Empire, censuses were conducted annually to determine the population of each village. Village census records for the last half of the 1600â€™s are remarkably complete. This very completeness makes one point stand out; in five different years, villages overwhelmingly reported significant population declines. Tellingly, each of those five years immediately followed an increase in a certain Drindian tax. This tax, which was assessed on villages, was computed by the central government using the annual census figures. Obviously, whenever the tax went up, villages had an especially powerful economic incentive to minimize the number of people they recorded; and concealing the size of a villageâ€™s population from government census takers would have been easy. Therefore, it is reasonable to think that the reported declines did not happen.

In the historianâ€™s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first supplies a context for the historianâ€™s argument; the second acknowledges a consideration that has been used to argue against the position the historian seeks to establish.

B. The first presents evidence to support the position that the historian seeks to establish; the second acknowledges a consideration that has been used to argue against that position.

C. The first provides a context for certain evidence that supports the position that the historian seeks to establish; the second is that position.

D. The first is a position for which the historian argues; the second is an assumption that serves as the basis of that argument.

E. The first is an assumption that the historian explicitly makes in arguing for a certain position; the second acknowledges a consideration that calls that assumption into question.
_________________

"Education is what remains when one has forgotten everything he learned in school."

If you have any questions
New!
Intern
Joined: 25 Jul 2006
Posts: 44
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2006, 21:20
Its either B or D!!

I go for D thgh...OA?
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2006
Posts: 366
Schools: Kellogg School of Management
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 3

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2006, 21:39
I would go for C.

The historian is using the fact that the census is complete to come to the conclusion that the reported decline in population might not have happened
Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2006
Posts: 244
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2006, 21:41
I think it is E
VP
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1172
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 148 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Dec 2006, 00:38
for me, C.

the first certainly is a context that the historian used.

2nd one is his conclusion: the villages fooled the census takers.
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 438
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Dec 2006, 00:55
C...
Senior Manager
Joined: 01 Oct 2006
Posts: 497
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Dec 2006, 01:27
C..
VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1025
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Dec 2006, 04:43
Swagatalakshmi wrote:
Historian: In the Drindian Empire, censuses were conducted annually to determine the population of each village. Village census records for the last half of the 1600â€™s are remarkably complete. This very completeness makes one point stand out; in five different years, villages overwhelmingly reported significant population declines. Tellingly, each of those five years immediately followed an increase in a certain Drindian tax. This tax, which was assessed on villages, was computed by the central government using the annual census figures. Obviously, whenever the tax went up, villages had an especially powerful economic incentive to minimize the number of people they recorded; and concealing the size of a villageâ€™s population from government census takers would have been easy. Therefore, it is reasonable to think that the reported declines did not happen.

In the historianâ€™s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first supplies a context for the historianâ€™s argument; the second acknowledges a consideration that has been used to argue against the position the historian seeks to establish.

B. The first presents evidence to support the position that the historian seeks to establish; the second acknowledges a consideration that has been used to argue against that position.

C. The first provides a context for certain evidence (in five different years, villages overwhelmingly reported significant population declines) that supports the position that the historian seeks to establish; the second is that position.

D. The first is a position for which the historian argues; the second is an assumption that serves as the basis of that argument.

E. The first is an assumption that the historian explicitly makes in arguing for a certain position; the second acknowledges a consideration that calls that assumption into question.

One more C.
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Jul 2006
Posts: 361
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Dec 2006, 08:08
C ( ..Therefore, it is reasonable to think that the reported declines did not happen. .... this the conclusion or position )
Director
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 751
Location: Dallas, Texas
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 145 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Dec 2006, 18:26
OA=C
_________________

"Education is what remains when one has forgotten everything he learned in school."

03 Dec 2006, 18:26
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Historian: In the Drindian Empire, censuses were conducted 3 0 27 Mar 2014, 08:19
Historian: In the Drindian Empire, censuses were conducted 8 13 Oct 2009, 10:57
Historian: In the Drindian Empire, censuses were conducted 3 27 Jan 2008, 01:56
17 Historian: In the Drindian Empire, censuses were conducted 21 03 Jan 2008, 13:29
Historian: In the Drindian Empire, censuses were conducted 3 29 Sep 2007, 11:06
Display posts from previous: Sort by