Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 19 Sep 2014, 09:57

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Historian: Newton developed mathematical concepts and

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 331
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 142 [0], given: 18

GMAT Tests User
Historian: Newton developed mathematical concepts and [#permalink] New post 15 Apr 2012, 14:59
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  85% (hard)

Question Stats:

55% (02:36) correct 45% (02:16) wrong based on 106 sessions
Historian: Newton developed mathematical concepts and techniques that are fundamental to modern calculus. Leibniz developed closely analogous concepts and techniques. It has traditionally been thought that these discoveries were independent. Researchers have, however, recently discovered notes of Leibniz’ that discuss one of Newton’s books on mathematics. Several scholars have argued that since the book includes a presentation of Newton’s calculus concepts and techniques, and since the notes were written before Leibniz’ own development of calculus concepts and techniques, it is virtually certain that the traditional view is false. A more cautious conclusion than this is called for, however. Leibniz’ notes are limited to early sections of Newton’s book, sections that precede the ones in which Newton’s calculus concepts and techniques are presented. In the historian’s reasoning, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first provides evidence in support of the overall position that the historian defends; the second is evidence that has been used to support an opposing position.

B. The first provides evidence in support of the overall position that the historian defends; the second is that position.

C. The first provides evidence in support of an intermediate conclusion that is drawn to provide support for the overall position that the historian defends; the second provides evidence against that intermediate conclusion.

D. The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the historian criticizes; the second is evidence offered in support of the historian’s own position.

E. The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the historian criticizes; the second is further information that substantiates that evidence.


I will post my reasoning in the reply section. Please tell me what's wrong with my reasoning.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by eybrj2 on 15 Apr 2012, 15:12, edited 1 time in total.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 331
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 142 [0], given: 18

GMAT Tests User
Re: GWD #5 V16 [#permalink] New post 15 Apr 2012, 15:10
Historian: Newton developed mathematical concepts and techniques that are fundamental to modern calculus. Leibniz developed closely analogous concepts and techniques. It has traditionally been thought that these discoveries were independent. Researchers have, however, recently discovered notes of Leibniz’ that discuss one of Newton’s books on mathematics. Several scholars have argued that since the book includes a presentation of Newton’s calculus concepts and techniques, and since the notes were written before Leibniz’ own development of calculus concepts and techniques, it is virtually certain that the traditional view is false. A more cautious conclusion than this is called for, however. Leibniz’ notes are limited to early sections of Newton’s book, sections that precede the ones in which Newton’s calculus concepts and techniques are presented.


Assetion 1
Evidence to support assertion 1

Assertion 2 that attacks assertion 1
Evidence to support assertion 2

I narrowed my choice down to C and D and picked c eventually, although I doubted about some parts in C.

C. The first provides evidence in support of an intermediate conclusion that is drawn to provide support for the overall position that the historian defends; the second provides evidence against that intermediate conclusion. ---> overall position ???

D. The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the historian criticizes; the second is evidence offered in support of the historian’s own position.

The reason why I didn't pick D is "the historians". I think that the passage didn't clearly state that who attacks the asserion 1.

Please, tell me what's wrong with my reasong and state your reasoning.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 370
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 31

Re: GWD #5 V16 [#permalink] New post 15 Apr 2012, 23:23
you may want to see a previous discussion :

historian-newton-developed-mathematical-concepts-and-100382.html


hope this helps..!!
_________________

Practice Practice and practice...!!

If my reply /analysis is helpful-->please press KUDOS
If there's a loophole in my analysis--> suggest measures to make it airtight.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 31
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V36
GPA: 3.59
WE: Accounting (Accounting)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 13

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: GWD #5 V16 [#permalink] New post 20 May 2012, 08:18
D. The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the historian criticizes; the second is evidence offered in support of the historian’s own position.

1) reasons why common belief is false = mood is a bit critical

2) But historian then presents his own position in contrary to other scientists

Thus, D it is!
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 201
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 22

GMAT Tests User
Re: GWD #5 V16 [#permalink] New post 21 May 2012, 00:52
Arguement:
Leibniz might have copied the calculus concepts from Newton.

Conclusion:
Leibniz did not copy the Newton's concepts and Leibniz's reference to the newton's material is limited to first few chapters at most which do not include calculus.

First Bold face statement argues against the conclusion.
Second bold face statement is in favor of the conclusion.

D points this one out.
Re: GWD #5 V16   [#permalink] 21 May 2012, 00:52
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Historian: Newton developed mathematical concepts and priyankur_saha@ml.com 16 15 Apr 2009, 07:25
2 Historian: Newton developed mathematical concepts and Nihit 6 25 Sep 2008, 06:56
Historian: Newton developed mathematical concepts and x97agarwal 1 03 Aug 2008, 11:32
Historian: Newton developed mathematical concepts and mymba99 12 14 May 2008, 10:43
Historian: Newton developed mathematical concepts and nakib77 18 19 Dec 2005, 03:57
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Historian: Newton developed mathematical concepts and

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.