Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 07:41 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 07:41

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Difficulty: 705-805 Levelx   Long Passagex   Social Sciencex                           
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 4384
Own Kudos [?]: 32876 [42]
Given Kudos: 4455
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Director
Director
Joined: 20 Sep 2016
Posts: 560
Own Kudos [?]: 933 [12]
Given Kudos: 632
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GPA: 3.6
WE:Operations (Consumer Products)
Send PM
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 580
Own Kudos [?]: 4324 [6]
Given Kudos: 197
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
Send PM
General Discussion
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 May 2014
Posts: 59
Own Kudos [?]: 132 [2]
Given Kudos: 11
Send PM
Re: Historians of women’s labor in the United States at first largely disr [#permalink]
2
Kudos
We have to consider three sentences to answer the first question

... For instance, early textile-mill entrepreneurs in justifying women’s employment in wage labor, made much of the assumption that women were by nature skillful at detailed tasks and patient in carrying out repetitive chores... ... ... And employers, who assumed that women’s “real” aspirations were for marriage and family life, declined to pay women wages commensurate with those of men... ... ... More remarkable than the origin has been the persistence of such sex segregation in twentieth-century industry

1. According to the passage, job segregation by sex in the United States was
(B) perpetuated by those textile-mill owners who argued in favor of women’s employment in wage labor
The word persistence is equivalent to perpetuated.

Obviously the other answer choices are not even close to answering the first question
(A) greatly demyelinated by labor mobilization during the Second World War
contrary to the passage suggests - despite the urgent need of the United States during the Second World War to mobilize its human resources fully, job segregation by sex characterized even the most important war industries

(C) one means by which women achieved greater job security
contrary to the passage suggests - many lower-skilled, lower-paid, less secure jobs came to be perceived as ‘female.'

(D) reluctantly challenged by employers except when the economic advantages were obvious
contrary to the passage suggests - employers showed surprisingly little interest in changing that perception, even when higher profits beckoned

(E) a constant source of labor unrest in the young textile industry
there is no mention of labor unrest. In fact women accepted all the low-paying, less secured jobs in the textile industry.
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 03 Jan 2015
Posts: 65
Own Kudos [?]: 301 [0]
Given Kudos: 146
Send PM
Re: Historians of women’s labor in the United States at first largely disr [#permalink]
7 out of 8 correct. I got number 7 incorrect.

1. (B)
    "The mill owners thus imported into the new industrial order hoary stereotypes associated with the homemaking activities they presumed to have been the purview of women"

2. (C)
    "These historians focused instead on factory work, primarily because it seemed so different from traditional, unpaid “women’s work” in the home, and because the underlying economic forces of industrialism were presumed to be gender-blind and hence emancipatory in effect. Unfortunately, emancipation has been less profound than expected, for not even industrial wage labor has escaped continued sex segregation in the workplace."

3. (E)
    "Historians of women’s labor in the United States at first largely disregarded the story of female service workers — women earning wages in occupations such as salesclerk, domestic servant, and office secretary. These historians focused instead on factory work, primarily because it seemed so different from traditional, unpaid “women’s work” in the home, and because the underlying economic forces of industrialism were presumed to be gender-blind and hence emancipatory in effect."

4. (C)
    "The mill owners thus imported into the new industrial order hoary stereotypes associated with the homemaking activities they presumed to have been the purview of women"

5. (E)
    " Unfortunately, emancipation has been less profound than expected, for not even industrial wage labor has escaped continued sex segregation in the workplace."

6. (C)
    "Moreover, once the war ended, employers quickly returned to men most of the ‘male’ jobs that women had been permitted to master."

7. I got this question incorrect

8. (A)
    Central idea: Emancipation has been less profound than expected
    The last paragraph, especially the last sentence ..."Moreover, once the war ended, employers quickly returned to men most of the ‘male’ jobs that women had been permitted to master."... seems to reinforce the central idea of the passage.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2017
Posts: 457
Own Kudos [?]: 723 [0]
Given Kudos: 294
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
GPA: 4
Send PM
Re: Historians of women’s labor in the United States at first largely disr [#permalink]
Hey carcass GMATNinja GMATNinjaTwo

Can you explain for question 6 why C is correct?
6. The passage supports which of the following statements about hiring policies in the United States?
(A) After a crisis many formerly “male” jobs are reclassified as “female” jobs.
(B) Industrial employers generally prefer to hire women with previous experience as homemakers.
(C) Post-Second World War hiring policies caused women to lose many of their wartime gains in employment opportunity.
(D) Even war industries during the Second World War were reluctant to hire women for factory work.
(E) The service sector of the economy has proved more nearly gender-blind in its hiring policies than has the manufacturing sector.

I read through the complete thread but I am still not convinced. Below is my thought process
- C says wartime gains - this is not mentioned in the passage that women lost their wartime gains. The passage just says men were returned the "men jobs"
- Hence I selected D. D says that there was segregation even during war. Although D mentions factory work which is not mentioned in the passage as well but I feel this is the best choice

Can you explain your thoughts here? Thanks :-)
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 4384
Own Kudos [?]: 32876 [2]
Given Kudos: 4455
Send PM
Re: Historians of women’s labor in the United States at first largely disr [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Top Contributor
pikolo2510 wrote:
Hey carcass GMATNinja GMATNinjaTwo

Can you explain for question 6 why C is correct?
6. The passage supports which of the following statements about hiring policies in the United States?
(A) After a crisis many formerly “male” jobs are reclassified as “female” jobs.
(B) Industrial employers generally prefer to hire women with previous experience as homemakers.
(C) Post-Second World War hiring policies caused women to lose many of their wartime gains in employment opportunity.
(D) Even war industries during the Second World War were reluctant to hire women for factory work.
(E) The service sector of the economy has proved more nearly gender-blind in its hiring policies than has the manufacturing sector.

I read through the complete thread but I am still not convinced. Below is my thought process
- C says wartime gains - this is not mentioned in the passage that women lost their wartime gains. The passage just says men were returned the "men jobs"
- Hence I selected D. D says that there was segregation even during war. Although D mentions factory work which is not mentioned in the passage as well but I feel this is the best choice

Can you explain your thoughts here? Thanks :-)

This is a tough question that can attack in two ways: OR eliminating all but C answers because are not mentioned in the passage and/or are different from what is stated I.E in the passage X >> Y and the answers says Y>>X for instance A OR finding right away the right one.

In the second scenariop if you look at the last two sentences of the passage you are right: clearly is not mentioned but this is an inference question

Quote:
And despite the urgent need of the United States during the Second World War to mobilize its human resources fully, job segregation by sex characterized even the most important war industries. Moreover, once the war ended, employers quickly returned to men most of the ‘male’ jobs that women had been permitted to master.


Which means actually what C is saying: a lot of male jobs that during the WWII was given to the women, back up to men once again because the primary reason was the women labor segregation was still strong.

As aside note, the passage is really difficult in its meaning, not convoluted but profound.

Regards
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Dec 2016
Posts: 21
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Schools: NTU '22 (S)
Send PM
Re: Historians of women’s labor in the United States at first largely disr [#permalink]
Hello,

Can someone please explain Q7?

Thanks.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 19 Sep 2015
Posts: 13
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: Historians of women’s labor in the United States at first largely disr [#permalink]
Can anyone explain the fifth question?
5. It can be inferred from the passage that the “unfinished revolution” the author mentions in line 13 refers to the

(A) entry of women into the industrial labor market
(B) recognition that work done by women as homemakers should be compensated at rates comparable to those prevailing in the service sector of the economy
(C) development of a new definition of femininity unrelated to the economic forces of industrialism
(D) introduction of equal pay for equal work in all professions
(E) emancipation of women wage earners from gender-determined job allocation

I think unfinished revolution means that there was continued sex segregation and even factory work was not gender blind.
VP
VP
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Posts: 1115
Own Kudos [?]: 2163 [0]
Given Kudos: 368
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 600 Q38 V35
GMAT 6: 710 Q47 V41
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: Historians of women’s labor in the United States at first largely disr [#permalink]
NHasan19058 wrote:
Can anyone explain the fifth question?
5. It can be inferred from the passage that the “unfinished revolution” the author mentions in line 13 refers to the

(A) entry of women into the industrial labor market
(B) recognition that work done by women as homemakers should be compensated at rates comparable to those prevailing in the service sector of the economy
(C) development of a new definition of femininity unrelated to the economic forces of industrialism
(D) introduction of equal pay for equal work in all professions
(E) emancipation of women wage earners from gender-determined job allocation

I think unfinished revolution means that there was continued sex segregation and even factory work was not gender blind.



At the end of the first para. the author states "unfortunately" the "emancipation has been less profound"
By emancipation, he is referring to the assumption that industrialisation should have removed and thus liberated women of gender inequities in employment.

Have you got the gist of what the author refers to now?

With this in mind:

A is incorrect because it doesn't refer to the entry, it refers to the inequity
B is incorrect because this is no way inferred from this portion of the passage
C is incorrect as the lack of emancipation and thus "unfinished revolution"
D is incorrect the author makes no such reference to equal pay introduction
E is correct because the author clearly states that despite the assumption that industralisation would eliminate any pay gap, this is not the case, so the "unfinished resolution" clearly refers to the liberation/ emancipation of women from such inequities as gender-determined job allocation.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 May 2017
Posts: 179
Own Kudos [?]: 300 [1]
Given Kudos: 779
Location: Iran (Islamic Republic of)
GMAT 1: 430 Q39 V12
Send PM
Re: Historians of women’s labor in the United States at first largely disr [#permalink]
1
Kudos
official answer Q1

The best answer is B. Lines 13-17 state that sex segregation persisted in the workplace because “a
prevailing definition of femininity” dictated the kinds of tasks women performed. The passage
then provides an example of this phenomenon by citing early textile-mill entrepreneurs who, “in
justifying women’s employment in wage labor, made much of the assumption that women were by
nature skillful at detailed tasks and patient in carrying out repetitive chores” (lines 18-21). Thus,
job segregation by sex in the United States was perpetuated by those textile-mill owners. A is
incorrect because lines 36-40 state job segregation by sex was not diminished during World War II.
Choice C is wrong because lines 30-31 state that many “female” jobs were “less secure”. Choices
D and E are not supported by the passage
Intern
Intern
Joined: 27 Feb 2019
Status:Active
Affiliations: NA
Posts: 23
Own Kudos [?]: -3 [0]
Given Kudos: 229
Location: India
GPA: 3.8
WE:Business Development (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Re: Historians of women’s labor in the United States at first largely disr [#permalink]
pikolo2510 wrote:
Hey carcass GMATNinja GMATNinjaTwo

Can you explain for question 6 why C is correct?
6. The passage supports which of the following statements about hiring policies in the United States?
(A) After a crisis many formerly “male” jobs are reclassified as “female” jobs.
(B) Industrial employers generally prefer to hire women with previous experience as homemakers.
(C) Post-Second World War hiring policies caused women to lose many of their wartime gains in employment opportunity.
(D) Even war industries during the Second World War were reluctant to hire women for factory work.
(E) The service sector of the economy has proved more nearly gender-blind in its hiring policies than has the manufacturing sector.

I read through the complete thread but I am still not convinced. Below is my thought process
- C says wartime gains - this is not mentioned in the passage that women lost their wartime gains. The passage just says men were returned the "men jobs"
- Hence I selected D. D says that there was segregation even during war. Although D mentions factory work which is not mentioned in the passage as well but I feel this is the best choice

Can you explain your thoughts here? Thanks :-)



That implies that during war women got jobs of men and gained jobs that were otherwise not available to them, and after the war they lost it back. So, they gained some advantage due to war and lost back after the war. Hope it helps!
Manager
Manager
Joined: 13 Apr 2019
Posts: 129
Own Kudos [?]: 147 [0]
Given Kudos: 93
Location: Canada
Concentration: Marketing, Operations
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.5
WE:General Management (Retail)
Send PM
Re: Historians of women’s labor in the United States at first largely disr [#permalink]
Question no. 2 and 6 please. Not able to figure out the logic to arrive at the correct answer.
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13958
Own Kudos [?]: 32908 [3]
Given Kudos: 5778
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: Historians of women’s labor in the United States at first largely disr [#permalink]
3
Kudos
Expert Reply
Official Explanation


2. According to the passage, historians of women’s labor focused on factory work as a more promising area of research than service-sector work because factory work

Difficulty Level: 650

Explanation

The phrase according to the passage indicates that the answer is stated in the passage. Look at the first paragraph, which discusses historians of women’s labor. These historians disregarded service work in favor of factory work not only because factory work differed from traditional “women’s work,” but also because the forces of industrialism were presumed to be gender-blind.

a. The passage does not indicate that historians studied factory workers because of higher wages.

b. The passage gives no evidence that historians chose this research area for this reason.

c. Correct. The passage indicates that the historians chose this research area because they assumed that sex segregation was less prevalent in factory work than in service-sector work.

d. Although the passage states that women accepted factory work more readily than did men, this difference is not cited in the passage as the reason historians focused on factory work.

e. Factory work may have fit the dynamic of industrialism better, but this is not the reason the passage gives for the historians’ choice.

The correct answer is C.


6. The passage supports which of the following statements about hiring policies in the United States?

Difficulty Level: 600

Explanation

Review each answer choice to see if it is explicitly supported by information in the passage. The last sentence of the passage states that, once the Second World War was over, men returned to take the “male” jobs that women had been temporarily allowed to master. Thus, the gains women had been allowed to make during the war (despite continued job segregation) were lost to them after men returned to work.

a. The last paragraph shows that after the Second World War, “male” jobs that had been held by women during the war were returned to men.

b. The passage does not mention industrial employers’ preferences for women with homemaking experience.

c. Correct. After the Second World War, women lost many employment opportunities that had been available to them during the war.

d. The passage says that job segregation persisted during the Second World War, but it does not indicate that those industries were reluctant to hire women.

e. No comparison is made in the passage to support this conclusion.

The correct answer is C.


Hope it helps

azhrhasan wrote:
Question no. 2 and 6 please. Not able to figure out the logic to arrive at the correct answer.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 16 Jan 2020
Posts: 39
Own Kudos [?]: 36 [0]
Given Kudos: 30
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V28
Send PM
Re: Historians of women’s labor in the United States at first largely disr [#permalink]
blueseas wrote:
lucasITA wrote:
why isn't answer D, question 6 , correct??



6. The passage supports which of the following statements about hiring policies in the United States?

(C) Post-Second World War hiring policies caused women to lose many of their wartime gains in employment opportunity.
(D) Even war industries during the Second World War were reluctant to hire women for factory work.

last paragraph:
More remarkable than the origin has been the persistence of such sex segregation in twentieth-century industry. Once an occupation came to be perceived as ‘female,’ employers showed surprisingly little interest in changing that perception, even when higher profits beckoned. And despite the urgent need of the United States during the Second World War to mobilize its human resources fully, job segregation by sex characterized even the most important war industries.Moreover, once the war ended, employers quickly returned to men most of the ‘male’ jobs that women had been permitted to master.

in this para it is told that ...there was requirement for workers in war industries...but still there was job segragation by sex....NOWHERE IT WRITTEN REGARDING FACTORY WORK...so we cant infer specially for the factory work....

for option C last line clearly supports:
once the war ended, employers quickly returned to men most of the ‘male’ jobsthat women had been permitted to ===>means after war...male jobs was given back to men..hence caused women to lose many of their wartime gains in employment opportunity.(women was doing the male jobs...during the war..and that was the gain for women...which they lost post war.)

hope it helps


The trouble with this reasoning is that you have inferred that there were legitimate HIRING POLICIES that caused women to lose many of their wartime gains in employment opportunity. NOWHERE IS IT WRITTEN THAT THERE WERE HIRING POLICIES.

You could just as easily infer there were hiring policies as you could the reluctancy to hire women for factory work.

I'd be very happy to hear your response, hopefully can learn a thing or two. :)
VP
VP
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Posts: 1378
Own Kudos [?]: 846 [0]
Given Kudos: 381
Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GPA: 3.81
Send PM
Re: Historians of women’s labor in the United States at first largely disr [#permalink]
Cellchat wrote:
blueseas wrote:
lucasITA wrote:
why isn't answer D, question 6 , correct??



6. The passage supports which of the following statements about hiring policies in the United States?

(C) Post-Second World War hiring policies caused women to lose many of their wartime gains in employment opportunity.
(D) Even war industries during the Second World War were reluctant to hire women for factory work.

last paragraph:
More remarkable than the origin has been the persistence of such sex segregation in twentieth-century industry. Once an occupation came to be perceived as ‘female,’ employers showed surprisingly little interest in changing that perception, even when higher profits beckoned. And despite the urgent need of the United States during the Second World War to mobilize its human resources fully, job segregation by sex characterized even the most important war industries.Moreover, once the war ended, employers quickly returned to men most of the ‘male’ jobs that women had been permitted to master.

in this para it is told that ...there was requirement for workers in war industries...but still there was job segragation by sex....NOWHERE IT WRITTEN REGARDING FACTORY WORK...so we cant infer specially for the factory work....

for option C last line clearly supports:
once the war ended, employers quickly returned to men most of the ‘male’ jobsthat women had been permitted to ===>means after war...male jobs was given back to men..hence caused women to lose many of their wartime gains in employment opportunity.(women was doing the male jobs...during the war..and that was the gain for women...which they lost post war.)

hope it helps


The trouble with this reasoning is that you have inferred that there were legitimate HIRING POLICIES that caused women to lose many of their wartime gains in employment opportunity. NOWHERE IS IT WRITTEN THAT THERE WERE HIRING POLICIES.

You could just as easily infer there were hiring policies as you could the reluctancy to hire women for factory work.

I'd be very happy to hear your response, hopefully can learn a thing or two. :)



Quote:
6. The passage supports which of the following statements about hiring policies in the United States?

(A) After a crisis many formerly “male” jobs are reclassified as “female” jobs.
(B) Industrial employers generally prefer to hire women with previous experience as homemakers.
(C) Post-Second World War hiring policies caused women to lose many of their wartime gains in employment opportunity.
(D) Even war industries during the Second World War were reluctant to hire women for factory work.
(E) The service sector of the economy has proved more nearly gender-blind in its hiring policies than has the manufacturing sector.



More remarkable than the origin has been the persistence of such sex segregation in twentieth-century industry. Once an occupation came to be perceived as ‘female,’ employers showed surprisingly little interest in changing that perception, even when higher profits beckoned. And despite the urgent need of the United States during the Second World War to mobilize its human resources fully, job segregation by sex characterized even the most important war industries. Moreover, once the war ended, employers quickly returned to men most of the ‘male’ jobs that women had been permitted to master.

In Summary: Key point is Female lost opportunties of jobs that they gained during 2nd world war.
A is against the key point
B is again against the key point
C: tone is same as our key point
D: against the information given
E: no comparison is given

So I know C is the answer. Yes , nothing is mentioned directly about hiring policies
but we can related the objective of hiring policies with employers returned to men. It seems they changed their policies to offer jobs to men than women , those jobs what women were handling during 2nd world war.
So C is best answer. Other options are not even close.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 May 2020
Posts: 171
Own Kudos [?]: 235 [1]
Given Kudos: 143
Concentration: Statistics, Finance
GPA: 3.41
WE:Advertising (Advertising and PR)
Send PM
Re: Historians of women’s labor in the United States at first largely disr [#permalink]
1
Kudos
5. It can be inferred from the passage that the “unfinished revolution” the author mentions in line 13 refers to the
Scope: To explain this unfinished revolution in the status of women, historians have recently begun to emphasize the way a prevailing definition of femininity often determines the kinds of work allocated to women, even when such allocation is inappropriate to new conditions.
“this unfinished revolution” → “this” refer to sth mentioned before → trace back to: “Unfortunately, emancipation has been less profound than expected, for not even industrial wage labor has escaped continued sex segregation in the workplace.”


(A) entry of women into the industrial labor market
(B) recognition that work done by women as homemakers should be compensated at rates comparable to those prevailing in the service sector of the economy
(C) development of a new definition of femininity unrelated to the economic forces of industrialism
(D) introduction of equal pay for equal work in all professions
(E) emancipation of women wage earners from gender-determined job allocation
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 May 2020
Posts: 171
Own Kudos [?]: 235 [0]
Given Kudos: 143
Concentration: Statistics, Finance
GPA: 3.41
WE:Advertising (Advertising and PR)
Send PM
Re: Historians of women’s labor in the United States at first largely disr [#permalink]
2. According to the passage, historians of women’s labor focused on factory work as a more promising area of research than service-sector work because factory work
Scope: These historians focused instead on factory work, primarily because it seemed so different from traditional, unpaid “women’s work” in the home, and because the underlying economic forces of industrialism were presumed to be gender-blind and hence emancipatory in effect.

(A) involved the payment of higher wages --> not mentioned
(B) required skill in detailed tasks → OOS
(C) was assumed to be less characterized by sex segregation → wrong info
(D) was more readily accepted by women than by men --> wrong info
(E) fitted the economic dynamic of industrialism better
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 Mar 2019
Posts: 47
Own Kudos [?]: 16 [0]
Given Kudos: 217
Location: India
GMAT 1: 660 Q44 V40
GMAT 2: 650 Q45 V37
Send PM
Re: Historians of womens labor in the United States at first largely disr [#permalink]
1. service vs. factory - H disregarded 1st and over 2nd
Bcz -
service was non-traditional and the factory was traditional = home
industrialization to be empowering to all irrespective of gender

But 2nd not true - bcz wage jobs were made available to men only

Summary - Hist didn't regard women in wage jobs as the number of women was low bcz of gender bias in work available.


2. Shift in the focus of historians to understand how gender & work interplay despite industrialization. Eg - women in textile mill - activities reflect home chores.
Unequal pay - women have different aspirations

Summary - the shift in focus to understand this difference. Cites examples and pov of employers.

3. summary - Gender division & bias continued in 20th despite all the odds and the need to do otherwise.

Please correct me if my understanding is incorrect
Intern
Intern
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 17
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 8
Send PM
Re: Historians of womens labor in the United States at first largely disr [#permalink]
Hey, could you please post official reply for Q8?
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Historians of womens labor in the United States at first largely disr [#permalink]
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
13958 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne