Shrikunj wrote:
Hey Mike,
Thank you for your reply.
Yes, I have tried to analyse the pattern of my mistakes in both quant and verbal. Most mistakes in verbal stem from a lack of attention to detail, but as I have improved my stamina with time and practice, I have been able to get a higher proportion of questions correct, the odd errors coming in genuinely dicey CR questions. Hope to further improve in that area.
As far as quant is concerned, I have watched the VE of every incorrect answer. Most errors have occurred in Number Properties and Geometry, especially in DS questions of these categories. My personal assessment was to review these concepts using the Manhattan study guides for these particular areas, and also reviewing the
Magoosh video lectures. Would that be the most efficient way to minimise further mistakes?
Dear
Shrikunj,
My friend, that sounds like a good start, but I would say: don't be so self-reliant. Ask for help.
You see, if there is something subtle about a math problem that you don't see, you may be apt to overlook this again when it passes in a VE or in the
MGMAT book or in a related lesson. If you ask an expert to explain it to you, then that expert is likely to go to the heart of the concept you overlooked and make it explicit to you. In the learning process, it very important to understand that, like any other person, you are limited by your own limits, which are often invisible to you, and you need the perspective of someone else who can point out what is just beyond your current reach.
I would say, with every math question you got wrong --- yes, use the
MGMAT guides, which are excellent; yes, review the
Magoosh video lectures. All good, but also, search for the question here on GMAT Club (many
Magoosh questions are posted here already). If you find, read the questions & explanations in that thread. If nothing in the discussion addresses your question, add your question to the thread. If you can't find the question posted anywhere already, then start a new thread. Post the question, and then in your question, be extremely detailed about your approach, about what you thought you should do, what you tried, what you know you couldn't go, etc. Make as much of your thinking process as explicit as possible, giving experts the chance to correct subtle misunderstandings and suggest subtle shifts in approaches. In any of those, feel free to enlist my aid if you would like my feedback.
Does all this make sense?
Mike