HKUST > Yale, according to Financial Times? : Business School Reviews
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 20 Jan 2017, 06:04

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# HKUST > Yale, according to Financial Times?

Author Message
Intern
Joined: 29 May 2009
Posts: 31
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

HKUST > Yale, according to Financial Times? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 May 2010, 14:25
Hi all. I was looking at the Financial Times ranking and oddly, HKUST Business School is ranked 9th over Yale School of Management, which is 16th:

In fact, HKUST is ranked above Yale, Stern, and Oxford.

I went to HKUST's site and they claim that 80% range of their GMAT scores are between 580-730:

Compare this to Yale, where the middle 80% range of their GMAT scores are between 660 and 760 (2010 class):

http://mba.yale.edu/MBA/students/class_statistics.shtml

How does the Financial Times compose these rankings? Is it because the US economy has been hit harder than Hong Kong/China, and because of the lower employment rates by new grads, Yale is ranked that badly?
Manager
Joined: 22 Oct 2009
Posts: 242
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.88
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 87 [1] , given: 1

Re: HKUST > Yale, according to Financial Times? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 May 2010, 15:56
1
KUDOS
I'm no expert, but it seems like it's hard to calculate a school's value outside of the country it exists within. If you want to work in Asia, go to HKUST. If you want to work in the United States, go to Yale. Aside from a few worldwide brands (HBS, Stanford, Wharton, LBS, maybe a few more), a school's value drops significantly outside of the home country. Even these worldwide brands (HBS, Stanford, Wharton, LBS) won't carry as much weight abroad -- but the drop isn't quite as significant.

In short -- I ignore worldwide rankings because it's almost impossible to compare them. It's all about perspective
Intern
Joined: 29 May 2009
Posts: 31
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Re: HKUST > Yale, according to Financial Times? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 May 2010, 21:52
YourDreamTheater wrote:
I'm no expert, but it seems like it's hard to calculate a school's value outside of the country it exists within. If you want to work in Asia, go to HKUST. If you want to work in the United States, go to Yale. Aside from a few worldwide brands (HBS, Stanford, Wharton, LBS, maybe a few more), a school's value drops significantly outside of the home country. Even these worldwide brands (HBS, Stanford, Wharton, LBS) won't carry as much weight abroad -- but the drop isn't quite as significant.

In short -- I ignore worldwide rankings because it's almost impossible to compare them. It's all about perspective

Isn't Yale a worldwide brand? I thought Yale is known quite well world wide...
Manager
Joined: 22 Oct 2009
Posts: 242
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.88
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 87 [0], given: 1

Re: HKUST > Yale, according to Financial Times? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 May 2010, 22:08
gmattester123 wrote:
YourDreamTheater wrote:
I'm no expert, but it seems like it's hard to calculate a school's value outside of the country it exists within. If you want to work in Asia, go to HKUST. If you want to work in the United States, go to Yale. Aside from a few worldwide brands (HBS, Stanford, Wharton, LBS, maybe a few more), a school's value drops significantly outside of the home country. Even these worldwide brands (HBS, Stanford, Wharton, LBS) won't carry as much weight abroad -- but the drop isn't quite as significant.

In short -- I ignore worldwide rankings because it's almost impossible to compare them. It's all about perspective

Isn't Yale a worldwide brand? I thought Yale is known quite well world wide...

There's a difference between a university brand and a business school brand. Sure, Yale has a great university brand (undergrad, law. etc.), but the business school isn't the same caliber (yet) as the other parts of the university.

There are plenty of other examples of top schools with b-schools that aren't quite up to par. Cambridge and Oxford come to mind.

This entire concept holds much more weight if you want to go into a field full of MBAs where your potential employers will know about the business school you come from. If you're going into a field where business school isn't the normal path, then overall lay-person prestige may hold more importance.
Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2009
Posts: 685
Schools: Ross 2012
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 4

Re: HKUST > Yale, according to Financial Times? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 May 2010, 06:05
By BW forum standards, the only ranking that matters is the USN rankings.
_________________

Respect my Authoritaaah!

VP
Joined: 11 Dec 2006
Posts: 1430
Location: New York, NY
Schools: NYU Stern 2009
Followers: 41

Kudos [?]: 221 [0], given: 6

Re: HKUST > Yale, according to Financial Times? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 May 2010, 07:04
The FT rankings are heavily influenced by International salary adjustments for quality of life. I would expect HKUST gets a boost for that, as does ISB.

milias wrote:
By BW forum standards, the only ranking that matters is the USN rankings.

milias - I can only imagine the BW forum collectively laid an egg when they saw the BW article about some MBAs choosing to leave the US. Plus the absurd 'twenty job offers' blatant lie...
_________________
Intern
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Posts: 35
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: HKUST > Yale, according to Financial Times? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 May 2010, 07:15
FT rankings are based on purchasing power parity. Look at their methodology.
Manager
Joined: 15 Nov 2009
Posts: 51
Location: San Diego, CA
WE 1: 6 years - Telecom
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 11

Re: HKUST > Yale, according to Financial Times? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jan 2011, 12:53
milias wrote:
By BW forum standards, the only ranking that matters is the USN rankings.

BW ranking doesn't matter in the BW forum?
_________________

If you won't invest in yourself, why would anybody wants to invest in you?

Re: HKUST > Yale, according to Financial Times?   [#permalink] 10 Jan 2011, 12:53
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
HKUST opinions, please 2 13 Jan 2013, 18:05
Yale School of Management - Yale SOM 1 06 Oct 2012, 08:17
Masters in Finance post-experience 2011 - Financial Times 1 30 Jun 2011, 04:06
27 not many takers for Yale, why? 26 07 Jul 2010, 09:06
1 Financial Times Global MBA rankings 2010 16 24 Jan 2010, 22:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by