|
Author |
Message |
|
Director
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 661
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
47
[0], given: 7
|
As the housing affordability gap widens, middle-income families are especially hard-hit, and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and rising rental rates force them to use far more than the standard 25 percent of their incomes for housing, leaving them with no equity or tax write-offs to offset the expenditures.
(A) and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and
(B) since these families can no longer afford to buy homes, furthermore
(C) for these families can no longer afford to buy homes, yet
(D) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes; however,
(E) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes, for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 806
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
66
[0], given: 0
|
rao_1857 wrote: As the housing affordability gap widens, middle-income families are especially hard-hit, and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and rising rental rates force them to use far more than the standard 25 percent of their incomes for housing, leaving them with no equity or tax write-offs to offset the expenditures.
(A) and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and
(B) since these families can no longer afford to buy homes, furthermore
(C) for these families can no longer afford to buy homes, yet
(D) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes; however,
(E) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes, for B
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2530
Followers: 41
Kudos [?]:
358
[0], given: 19
|
rao_1857 wrote: As the housing affordability gap widens, middle-income families are especially hard-hit, and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and rising rental rates force them to use far more than the standard 25 percent of their incomes for housing, leaving them with no equity or tax write-offs to offset the expenditures.
(A) and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and
(B) since these families can no longer afford to buy homes, furthermore
(C) for these families can no longer afford to buy homes, yet
(D) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes; however,
(E) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes, for i take on C.
_________________
Verbal: new-to-the-verbal-forum-please-read-this-first-77546.html
Math: new-to-the-math-forum-please-read-this-first-77764.html
Gmat: everything-you-need-to-prepare-for-the-gmat-revised-77983.html
GT
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 661
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
47
[0], given: 7
|
GMAT TIGER wrote: rao_1857 wrote: As the housing affordability gap widens, middle-income families are especially hard-hit, and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and rising rental rates force them to use far more than the standard 25 percent of their incomes for housing, leaving them with no equity or tax write-offs to offset the expenditures.
(A) and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and
(B) since these families can no longer afford to buy homes, furthermore
(C) for these families can no longer afford to buy homes, yet
(D) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes; however,
(E) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes, for i take on C. Isn't "for" is a little awakward construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 246
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
18
[0], given: 0
|
I will vote for C.
Its between B and C . I picked C because if we try the sentence after removing the modifying phrase 'since these ..' it becomes like : middle-income families are especially hard-hit, furthermore rising rental rates force => which is awkward. middle-income families are especially hard-hit, yet rising rental rates force => sounds better
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Mar 2008
Posts: 351
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
33
[0], given: 0
|
I agree with ssandeepan, "yet" construction is required here rather than furthermore.
_________________
To find what you seek in the road of life, the best proverb of all is that which says:
"Leave no stone unturned."
-Edward Bulwer Lytton
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1593
Followers: 7
Kudos [?]:
131
[0], given: 0
|
Between B and E, I will go for B. "since" introduces the beginning of subordinate clause for "middle-income families are especially hard-hit". Also, "furthermore" introduces another sub-ordinate clause.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 661
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
47
[0], given: 7
|
OA is C.
Thanks everyone ..
Thanks ssandeepan for your explanation!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Posts: 309
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
12
[0], given: 0
|
can anybody please explain why B is not right ? (i saw sandeep's post but still if somebody can throw some more light on this wud be great !)
yet : though , still (meaning)
do you really think this construction will make sense in C ?
i thought the later clause goes ahead in explaining why middle families are hard-hit
please explain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 243
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
12
[0], given: 0
|
rao_1857 wrote: As the housing affordability gap widens, middle-income families are especially hard-hit, and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and rising rental rates force them to use far more than the standard 25 percent of their incomes for housing, leaving them with no equity or tax write-offs to offset the expenditures.
(A) and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and
(B) since these families can no longer afford to buy homes, furthermore
(C) for these families can no longer afford to buy homes, yet
(D) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes; however,
(E) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes, for C. Because buying homes is contrasted with renting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, Zarrolou, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab
|
close
