Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

Hello everyone.

For years, everyone's been talking about plugging in numbers for algebra problems. You pick a number for the variable, plug it in, get an answer, and then find that answer in the answer choices.

I think this is dangerous, because it only works sometimes, and I think that algebra or some other trick is always important as a backup. Plugging in should be done by people who understand it and when not to use it.

Sorry for waxing on about that, but I ran across a problem today that would be very difficult to plug numbers into, but is also very time consuming using straightforward algebra. You might expect it to work out well with substitution, but you'll see that it doesn't. So I thought I'd post it here and see what everyone thought about it, and if there's some clever thing that I'm not seeing.

--------------
If 2x + 3y = 1, what is (x/2) + (y/3) in terms of y?

A) y/5

B) (1 - 3y)/2

C) (1 - 3y)/4

D) (3y + 4)/15

E) (3 - 5y)/12

Last edited by ian7777 on 25 Aug 2004, 17:56, edited 1 time in total.

(E). 20 secs. I think good old substitution is still very fast in this case. If you note that you'll end up with 2 and 3 as denominator, you can work two steps ahead while substituting by adjusting the integer value of y as you work throuhg the problem.