|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1714
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
17
[0], given: 0
|
How many integers from 0 to 50, inclusive, have a remainder [#permalink]
28 Jan 2006, 11:20
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
How many integers from 0 to 50, inclusive, have a remainder of 1 when divided by 3?
A) 15
B) 16
C) 17
D) 18
E) 19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Posts: 559
Location: Germany
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
50/3= 16,...
The number infront of the comma is the answer; never round up!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 21 Sep 2003
Posts: 1079
Location: USA
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
17
[0], given: 0
|
Is it C =17?
There are 16 multiples of 3 and hence there are 16 numbers that leave reminder of 1 (Note checked 48+1 = 49 <50)
1 also leaves a remainder 1 when divided by 3!
Hence 16+1 = 17
_________________
"To dream anything that you want to dream, that is the beauty of the human mind. To do anything that you want to do, that is the strength of the human will. To trust yourself, to test your limits, that is the courage to succeed."
- Bernard Edmonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Posts: 559
Location: Germany
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 339
Location: London
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
4
[0], given: 0
|
is it 16.
first number is 4, the last number is 49, which gives remainder 1 if divided by 3.
49-4 = 45, 45/3 =15
15+1 =16
the number below 4, and 50 is of no use here
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 06 Jun 2004
Posts: 1068
Location: CA
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
12
[0], given: 0
|
TeHCM wrote: 3X + 1 = 50
x = 16.3333..
16 it is
I forgot to count 1
17 it is
_________________
Don't be afraid to take a flying leap of faith.. If you risk nothing, than you gain nothing...
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5134
Location: Singapore
Followers: 9
Kudos [?]:
87
[0], given: 0
|
I see it as an A.P with 4 as the first term.
1,4,7,10,13,16.......
Last number in this series = 49
Therefore total number of numbers = (49-1)/3 + 1 = 17
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1714
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
17
[0], given: 0
|
Well, the OA is 17.
3x+1 = 50
x = 16.333...
need to count a '1', so answer is 17.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 395
Location: Boston, MA
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
sorry, I know this post is dead but I would like to know how 1 divided by 3 has a remainder of 1? I thought the numerator had to be greater than the denom. in order to have an integer plus an integer remainder. What am I missing?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 30 Jan 2006
Posts: 148
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Good question buckkitty... can somebody please clarify, step-by-step?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 395
Location: Boston, MA
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
I think I may have answered my own question. (1/3) will have a remainder of 1 when the quotient is 0. (x/y)=q+r ......x=y(q) + r , for integers x and y, with the remainder r. Therefore, 1=3(0) + 1. Is this correctly stated?
I always forget about zero and the tricky roles it plays in questions....
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5134
Location: Singapore
Followers: 9
Kudos [?]:
87
[0], given: 0
|
Remainder 1:
1,4,7,10 ... 49
Number of integers = (49-1/3) + 1 = 17
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5289
Followers: 17
Kudos [?]:
91
[0], given: 0
|
The trick to this question is in the wording. 1 divided by three does have a remainder of 1, but NOT an integer remainder of 1.
Only the geeks at Pearson would brainstorm a trick question like this...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 395
Location: Boston, MA
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
I thought that a remainder had to be an integer, is that an incorrect assumption?
Grrrrrr!!! I hate these tricky questions!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 30 Jan 2006
Posts: 148
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Let me give it a shot (checking my own understanding in the process)...
Formula for Arithmetic Progression:
an = a1 + (n-1)d
where an = nth term; a1 = first term; n = number of terms; d = difference of succesive numbers
using 4 (which leaves a remainder of 1) as the first term and 49 (which leaves a remainder of 1) as the last term, we can solve for n
49 = 4 + (n-1)3 ---> n = 16
HOWEVER, n = 16 when the first term, i.e. the first number leaving a remainder of 1, is 4. But we have to remember that zero is an integer as well. Therefore, the number 1, when divided by 3 leaves a remainder of 1 as well. The expression would look like this:
3x + 1 = 1
3(0) + 1 = 1
Hence, the answer is 16 + 1 = 17
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Posts: 58
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Can somebody explain
the logic of 3x+1 = 50??
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1714
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
17
[0], given: 0
|
Nayan wrote: Can somebody explain the logic of 3x+1 = 50??
Find 'x' for which above equation is true or appox true
your will get x = 17 (giving answer 51)
In other words, just remember table of three & check which position gives you number below/equal to 50. 3*16 = 48. So, 16 numbers, but table of 3 doesn't include '1'. So include '1', 16+1 = 17.
Now, why tables of 3? Because each element has remainder of 0 when divided by 3?
This is a trick, each element + 1, will give remainder of 1. This can be used for any such problem
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar topics |
Author |
Replies |
Last post |
|
Similar Topics:
|
|
|
|
How many integers from 0 to 50, inclusive, have a remainder
|
M8 |
7 |
30 Apr 2006, 08:05 |
|
|
|
How many integers from 0 to 50, inclusive, have a remainder
|
Stormgal |
9 |
22 Mar 2007, 12:19 |
|
|
|
How many integers from 0 to 50, inclusive, have a remainder
|
GK_Gmat |
6 |
27 Jun 2007, 04:00 |
|
|
|
How many integers from 0 to 50 inclusive have a remainder of
|
puma |
14 |
12 May 2008, 08:46 |
|
3
|
|
How many integers from 0 to 50, inclusive, have a remainder
|
Economist |
25 |
24 Mar 2009, 23:51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|