Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

KS, why wouldn't the prob of the thousands digit be 5/9 ? Because 0 cannot be chosen here. I've seen this applied to other problems as well. Thoughts?

Thanks

If N=10,000 then the P for the thousands digit is 5/10 , since 00001 is a valid number (equal to 1).

If N=5000 then you don't need the P of the thousands digit at all (since its equal to 1).

Can you give me an example for other the problems you saw ?

I'm still lost...i still dont understand why n=10,000 with working out the problem with the thousandth digit. Killer Squirrel, you said If N=10,000 then the P for the thousands digit is 5/10 but i thought N=5000 with the 5/10.

Sorry mate! if you dont mind could you (or anyone else for that matter) spell this out nice and easy for a poor fool like myself?

In a set of numbers from 100 to 1000 inclusive, how many integers are odd and do not contain the digit "5"?

a. 180 b. 196 c. 286 d. 288 e. 324 --------- My solution, using the probability method:

N = 1000 - 100 = 900 P = (8/9)*(9/10)*(4/10) = 288/900

N*P = 900*(288/900) = 288 D. ----------

For the hundreds digit I've used 8/9. Wouldn't you use the same thinking for this question and use 5/9 ?

This problem can be solved in this way :

N = 1000

P = 8/10*9/10*4/10 = 288/1000

N*P = 288

or it can be solve as you solved it.

The main difference in this problem from the problem we discussed earlier is that in this case you cannot use P = 1 for the hundreds digit since this problem don't allow you to use five in the hundreds digit.

If you could use five then the P for the hundreds digit was 9/9 = 1 and you could just ignore it (the only number you can't choose is 0).

Last edited by KillerSquirrel on 15 Nov 2007, 11:55, edited 2 times in total.

KS, why wouldn't the prob of the thousands digit be 5/9 ? Because 0 cannot be chosen here. I've seen this applied to other problems as well. Thoughts?

Thanks

If N=10,000 then the P for the thousands digit is 5/10 , since 00001 is a valid number (equal to 1).

If N=5000 then you don't need the P of the thousands digit at all (since its equal to 1).

Can you give me an example for other the problems you saw ?

I'm still lost...i still dont understand why n=10,000 with working out the problem with the thousandth digit. Killer Squirrel, you said If N=10,000 then the P for the thousands digit is 5/10 but i thought N=5000 with the 5/10.

Sorry mate! if you dont mind could you (or anyone else for that matter) spell this out nice and easy for a poor fool like myself?

thanks!

Read the following attachment - If you are still lost PM me.

Harvard asks you to write a post interview reflection (PIR) within 24 hours of your interview. Many have said that there is little you can do in this...