Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

How many people are directors of both Company K and Company [#permalink]

Show Tags

19 Mar 2010, 06:03

3

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

76% (01:41) correct
24% (00:40) wrong based on 260 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

How many people are directors of both Company K and Company R ?

(1) There were 17 directors present at a joint meeting of the directors of Company K and Company R, and no directors were absent. (2) Company K has 12 directors and Company R has 8 directors.

This isn't a difficult question, nor does it require calculations. But I still just don't get the answer.

How many people are directors of both Company K and Company R?

[1] There were 17 directors present at a joint meeting of the directors of Company K and Company R, and no directors were absent. [2] Company K has 12 directors and Company R has 8 directors.

I would think the answer is A. "...17 directors present at...meeting of the directors of Company K and Company R...none were absent."

But the answer is C.

Maybe I haven't had enough food today.

stmnt1 - total 17 directors of Company K and R. We dont know how many are directors of both K and R. hence insuff

stmnt2- again insuff. we just know the number of directors in K and R

taking together we have total 17 directors. Out of this 17, 12 are members of K which leaves only 5 members but company R has 8 members so 3 are members of both K and R. hence C

This isn't a difficult question, nor does it require calculations. But I still just don't get the answer.

How many people are directors of both Company K and Company R?

[1] There were 17 directors present at a joint meeting of the directors of Company K and Company R, and no directors were absent. [2] Company K has 12 directors and Company R has 8 directors.

I would think the answer is A. "...17 directors present at...meeting of the directors of Company K and Company R...none were absent."

But the answer is C.

Maybe I haven't had enough food today.

actually if u see they are asking for the union of company K and R's director, lets say its x then KUR = K+R - kr => 17 = 12 +8 -kr => kr = 3 we cannot deduce intersection from any one stmt but with both the stmts. so ans is C
_________________

This isn't a difficult question, nor does it require calculations. But I still just don't get the answer.

How many people are directors of both Company K and Company R?

[1] There were 17 directors present at a joint meeting of the directors of Company K and Company R, and no directors were absent. [2] Company K has 12 directors and Company R has 8 directors.

I would think the answer is A. "...17 directors present at...meeting of the directors of Company K and Company R...none were absent."

But the answer is C.

Maybe I haven't had enough food today.

I think where you got confused was the difference between 'How many people are directors of both Company K and Company R' and 'How many total directors are there in Company K and Company R'. The question asks how many people are directors of both companies.

There are some people who are directors of only Company K, some who are directors of only company R and some who are directors of both. Now think, is statement 1 sufficient? It only tells us the total number of directors, not the ones common to K and R. If statement 2 alone sufficient. It again tells us how many each company has, not how many they have in common. When you take both statements together, you find out that total there are 17 directors. Company K has 12 and company R has 8 which adds up to 20 so 3 directors must be common to them. Now we get the information we were looking for. Answer (C). Check out sets theory for more such questions.
_________________

MGMAT Double Set Matrix for this DS-problem [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Sep 2012, 12:39

Hi,

I usually use the Double Set Matrix MGMAT suggests when I have to solve OS-questions. Now I came across this problem in the OG (question 50 in DS section, 12th):

How many people are directors of both Company K and Company R ?

(1) There were 17 directors present at a joint meeting of the directors of Company K and Company R, and no directors were absent. (2) Company K has 12 directors and Company R has 8 directors.

Solution is pretty straightforward if you take a moment and think about it. But I was wondering if you can deduce the answer just by looking at the Double Set Matrix.

Re: MGMAT Double Set Matrix for this DS-problem [#permalink]

Show Tags

10 Sep 2012, 01:49

alex01 wrote:

Hi,

I usually use the Double Set Matrix MGMAT suggests when I have to solve OS-questions. Now I came across this problem in the OG (question 50 in DS section, 12th):

How many people are directors of both Company K and Company R ?

(1) There were 17 directors present at a joint meeting of the directors of Company K and Company R, and no directors were absent. (2) Company K has 12 directors and Company R has 8 directors.

Solution is pretty straightforward if you take a moment and think about it. But I was wondering if you can deduce the answer just by looking at the Double Set Matrix.

Its 'C' for me. as none of the sentence is self sufficient to answer the question.

I don't understand why any of the 17 directors couldn't be directors of the both Company X and Company Y. What am I missing?

20-17 = 3 doesn't make sense to me.

How many people are directors of both Company K and Company R ?

(1) There were 17 directors present at a joint meeting of the directors of Company K and Company R, and no directors were absent. Together Company K and Company R have 17 directors (total #). Not sufficient to say how many people out of those 17 are directors of both.

(2) Company K has 12 directors and Company R has 8 directors. We know how many directors has each company, but it's still not sufficient to to say how many are directors of both.

(1)+(2) Company K has 12 directors and Company R has 8 directors, which adds up to 12+8=20, since we know that there are total of 17 directors then 20-17=3 people must be directors of both Company K and Company R. Sufficient.

Re: How many people are directors of both Company K and Company [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Feb 2016, 20:40

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...

The words of John O’Donohue ring in my head every time I reflect on the transformative, euphoric, life-changing, demanding, emotional, and great year that 2016 was! The fourth to...