Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

divide series in rational and irrational no's since sum of rational is always rational and irrational is always irrational that means in the above series 120=3+9+27+81....4 terms 121*(3^1/2)=(1+3+9+27+81)*(3^1/2).... 5 terms so ans is 9....E

divide series in rational and irrational no's since sum of rational is always rational and irrational is always irrational

That's true in this question, but not in general. The sum of two rational numbers is always rational, but the sum of two irrational numbers does not need to be irrational. For example, √2 and 2 - √2 are both irrational, but their sum is 2, a rational number. That's not the kind of thing the GMAT ever tests, however.
_________________

GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

How many terms of the series r 3^(1/2) + 3 + 3*(3^(1/2)) +.... will form 120 + 121*(3^(1/2))?

A. 3 B. 4 C. 5 D. 6 E. 9

We have a following sequence: \(\sqrt{3}\), \(3\), \(3\sqrt{3}\), \(9\), ...

Notice that this sequence is a geometric progression with first term equal to \(\sqrt{3}\) and common ratio also equal to \(\sqrt{3}\).

The question asks: the sum of how many terms of this sequence adds up to \(120+121\sqrt{3}\).

The sum of the first \(n\) terms of geometric progression is given by: \(sum=\frac{b*(r^{n}-1)}{r-1}\), (where \(b\) is the first term, \(n\) # of terms and \(r\) is a common ratio \(\neq{1}\)).

Shortcut solution: Alternately you can spot that every second term (which also form a geometric progression), 3, 9, 27, ... should add up to 120: \(\frac{3(3^k-1)}{3-1}=120\) --> \(3^k-1=80\) --> \(3^k=81\) --> \(k=4\), so the number of terms must be either \(2k=8\) (if there are equal number of irrational and rational terms) or \(2k+1=9\) (if # of irrational terms, with \(\sqrt{3}\), is one more than # rational terms), since only 9 is present among options then it must be a correct answers.

Sum of first 2 terms\(= 3 + \sqrt{3}\) Sum of first 3 terms \(= 3 + (\sqrt{3} + 3\sqrt{3})\) Sum of first 4 terms\(= (3+9) + 4\sqrt{3}\) Sum of first 5 terms \(= 12 + (4 + 9)\sqrt{3}\) etc

You want a sum of \(120 + 121\sqrt{3}\)

You will obtain 120 by adding 3 + 9 + 27 + 81 (4 terms) and \(121\sqrt{3}\) by adding \((1 + 3 + 9 + 27 + 81)\sqrt{3}\) (i.e. 5 terms)

So you need to add a total of 9 terms.
_________________

Re: How many terms of the series r 3^(1/2) + 3 + 3*(3^(1/2)) +.. [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Jun 2013, 06:26

My method is not very sophisticated and most probably not the best but in some cases it works. The most crucial part here is to understand the question. Basically we have a sequesnce \sqrt{3}+3+3\sqrt{3}+ .... which is the same as: \sqrt{3}+\sqrt{3}*\sqrt{3}+\sqrt{3}*\sqrt{3}*\sqrt{3}+\sqrt{3}*\sqrt{3}*\sqrt{3}*\sqrt{3}+....

As it could be seen each time next term is multiplied by \sqrt{3}.

Now the questions asks us to find how many numbers this sequence should consists of in order to be equal of 120 + 121*\sqrt{3}.

What i did, i have just tried to make the calculation easier and tried to simplify the 120 + 121*\sqrt{3}=40*\sqrt{3}*\sqrt{3}+121*\sqrt{3}=\sqrt{3}(40\sqrt{3}+121)

Now go back to our sequence, if we take the common \sqrt{3} out of the brackets we have \sqrt{3}(1+\sqrt{3}+3+3\sqrt{3}+9+9\sqrt{3}) ---> \sqrt{3}(13+13\sqrt{3}) This is the sum of 6 terms in the sequence, which is clearly less than \sqrt{3}(40\sqrt{3}+121). We can go and check whether 9 (next possible choice) will fit, but considering that 9 is the only choice left it should be it. The answer is E.
_________________

If you found my post useful and/or interesting - you are welcome to give kudos!

My method is not very sophisticated and most probably not the best but in some cases it works. The most crucial part here is to understand the question. Basically we have a sequesnce \sqrt{3}+3+3\sqrt{3}+ .... which is the same as: \sqrt{3}+\sqrt{3}*\sqrt{3}+\sqrt{3}*\sqrt{3}*\sqrt{3}+\sqrt{3}*\sqrt{3}*\sqrt{3}*\sqrt{3}+....

As it could be seen each time next term is multiplied by \sqrt{3}.

Now the questions asks us to find how many numbers this sequence should consists of in order to be equal of 120 + 121*\sqrt{3}.

What i did, i have just tried to make the calculation easier and tried to simplify the 120 + 121*\sqrt{3}=40*\sqrt{3}*\sqrt{3}+121*\sqrt{3}=\sqrt{3}(40\sqrt{3}+121)

Now go back to our sequence, if we take the common \sqrt{3} out of the brackets we have \sqrt{3}(1+\sqrt{3}+3+3\sqrt{3}+9+9\sqrt{3}) ---> \sqrt{3}(13+13\sqrt{3}) This is the sum of 6 terms in the sequence, which is clearly less than \sqrt{3}(40\sqrt{3}+121). We can go and check whether 9 (next possible choice) will fit, but considering that 9 is the only choice left it should be it. The answer is E.

Re: How many terms of the series r 3^(1/2) + 3 + 3*(3^(1/2)) +.. [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Mar 2014, 21:31

Is the original question missing a "+9" in the portion describing the sequence? It was hard to know what the series would with just 3 terms (as the question currently is). For example, if we only know 3^(1/2), 3, 3*3^(1/2), one could interpret that the series is defined as every input starting from the 3rd is the product of the previous 2. Hope this makes sense. Please edit the question stem because I see a +9 in the answer explanations but not the question itself.

Is the original question missing a "+9" in the portion describing the sequence? It was hard to know what the series would with just 3 terms (as the question currently is). For example, if we only know 3^(1/2), 3, 3*3^(1/2), one could interpret that the series is defined as every input starting from the 3rd is the product of the previous 2. Hope this makes sense. Please edit the question stem because I see a +9 in the answer explanations but not the question itself.

Re: How many terms of the series r 3^(1/2) + 3 + 3*(3^(1/2)) + 9 [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Jul 2014, 12:01

Bunuel wrote:

Anasthaesium wrote:

How many terms of the series r 3^(1/2) + 3 + 3*(3^(1/2)) +.... will form 120 + 121*(3^(1/2))?

A. 3 B. 4 C. 5 D. 6 E. 9

We have a following sequence: \(\sqrt{3}\), \(3\), \(3\sqrt{3}\), \(9\), ...

Notice that this sequence is a geometric progression with first term equal to \(\sqrt{3}\) and common ratio also equal to \(\sqrt{3}\).

The question asks: the sum of how many terms of this sequence adds up to \(120+121\sqrt{3}\).

The sum of the first \(n\) terms of geometric progression is given by: \(sum=\frac{b*(r^{n}-1)}{r-1}\), (where \(b\) is the first term, \(n\) # of terms and \(r\) is a common ratio \(\neq{1}\)).

Shortcut solution: Alternately you can spot that every second term (which also form a geometric progression), 3, 9, 27, ... should add up to 120: \(\frac{3(3^k-1)}{3-1}=120\) --> \(3^k-1=80\) --> \(3^k=81\) --> \(k=4\), so the number of terms must be either \(2k=8\) (if there are equal number of irrational and rational terms) or \(2k+1=9\) (if # of irrational terms, with \(\sqrt{3}\), is one more than # rational terms), since only 9 is present among options then it must be a correct answers.

Hope it's clear.

I got confused on how you got from \(\frac{\sqrt{3}(\sqrt{3}^n-1)}{\sqrt{3}-1}=120+121\sqrt{3}\) --> \(\sqrt{3}(\sqrt{3}^n-1)=120\sqrt{3}+121*3-120-121\sqrt{3}\) to --> \(\sqrt{3}*\sqrt{3}^n-\sqrt{3}=243-\sqrt{3}\) --> \(\sqrt{3}*\sqrt{3}^n=243\) --> \(3^{\frac{1+n}{2}}=3^5\) --> \(\frac{1+n}{2}=5\) --> \(n=9\).

So the part after the cross multiplication, can you break it down further for me? Like what happened to the 121 *3 ?

How many terms of the series r 3^(1/2) + 3 + 3*(3^(1/2)) +.... will form 120 + 121*(3^(1/2))?

A. 3 B. 4 C. 5 D. 6 E. 9

We have a following sequence: \(\sqrt{3}\), \(3\), \(3\sqrt{3}\), \(9\), ...

Notice that this sequence is a geometric progression with first term equal to \(\sqrt{3}\) and common ratio also equal to \(\sqrt{3}\).

The question asks: the sum of how many terms of this sequence adds up to \(120+121\sqrt{3}\).

The sum of the first \(n\) terms of geometric progression is given by: \(sum=\frac{b*(r^{n}-1)}{r-1}\), (where \(b\) is the first term, \(n\) # of terms and \(r\) is a common ratio \(\neq{1}\)).

Shortcut solution: Alternately you can spot that every second term (which also form a geometric progression), 3, 9, 27, ... should add up to 120: \(\frac{3(3^k-1)}{3-1}=120\) --> \(3^k-1=80\) --> \(3^k=81\) --> \(k=4\), so the number of terms must be either \(2k=8\) (if there are equal number of irrational and rational terms) or \(2k+1=9\) (if # of irrational terms, with \(\sqrt{3}\), is one more than # rational terms), since only 9 is present among options then it must be a correct answers.

Hope it's clear.

I got confused on how you got from \(\frac{\sqrt{3}(\sqrt{3}^n-1)}{\sqrt{3}-1}=120+121\sqrt{3}\) --> \(\sqrt{3}(\sqrt{3}^n-1)=120\sqrt{3}+121*3-120-121\sqrt{3}\) to --> \(\sqrt{3}*\sqrt{3}^n-\sqrt{3}=243-\sqrt{3}\) --> \(\sqrt{3}*\sqrt{3}^n=243\) --> \(3^{\frac{1+n}{2}}=3^5\) --> \(\frac{1+n}{2}=5\) --> \(n=9\).

So the part after the cross multiplication, can you break it down further for me? Like what happened to the 121 *3 ?

How many terms of the series r 3^(1/2) + 3 + 3*(3^(1/2)) + 9 [#permalink]

Show Tags

10 Sep 2014, 02:10

Anasthaesium wrote:

How many terms of the series r 3^(1/2) + 3 + 3*(3^(1/2)) + 9 + ... will form 120 + 121*(3^(1/2))?

A. 3 B. 4 C. 5 D. 6 E. 9

Since four of the of the terms are provided and is = 12 +4*3^(1/2) approx 18, A & B eliminated add 9*3^(1/2) approx 15 so sum approx 33 eliminated once more and D eliminated , leaving E as the correct answer

Re: How many terms of the series r 3^(1/2) + 3 + 3*(3^(1/2)) + 9 [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Oct 2015, 13:43

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Re: How many terms of the series r 3^(1/2) + 3 + 3*(3^(1/2)) + 9 [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Jan 2017, 19:18

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...