How to get 6.0 AWA....my guide : Analytical Writing Assessment (AWA) - Page 3
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 19 Jan 2017, 12:36

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# How to get 6.0 AWA....my guide

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Feb 2008
Posts: 348
Schools: UCSD ($) , UCLA, USC ($), Stanford
Followers: 187

Kudos [?]: 2929 [1476] , given: 2

How to get 6.0 AWA....my guide [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 May 2008, 05:56
1476
KUDOS
1551
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Guide to Perfect 6.0 AWA GMAT Score

Related AWA Resources:

I took the GMAT twice and scored 6.0 each time. I did put a lot of time in it the first time....too much actually. Being a non-native speaker and having not written a damn essay (of any kind) in many many years, I was very scared of the AWA. So, I went through every guide that I could find and wrote nearly 25-30 essays. Even had a friend grade them for me.....Pathetic, huh?

Anyway, for my second time, I just looked over my templates I created and wrote one of each the day before test just to refresh my memory on faster typing without making too many typos......

So, here it is....Enjoy, and please do not blame me if the 6.0 percentile goes down to 80 soon

AWA GUIDE

by Chineseburned

1. General Structure

Intro - Restate argument, point out flaws or state intention to discuss them below
1st Para - First,...
3rd Para - Third/Finally,...
Conclusion - The argument is flawed/weak/unconvincing because of the above -mentioned...Ultimately, the argument can be strengthened if/by...

2. Structural Word (should be all over the essays)

1. Supporting examples - for example, to illustrate, for instance, because, specifically
2. Additional support - furthermore, in addition, similarly, just as, also, as a result, moreover
3. Importance - surely, truly, undoubtedly, clearly, in fact, most importantly
4. Contrast - on the contrary, yet, despite, rather, instead, however, although, while
5. Decide against - one cannot deny that, it could be argued that, granted, admittedly
6. Ying-yang - on the one hand/on the other hand
7. Concluding - therefore, in summary, consequently, hence, in conclusion, ultimately, in closing

3. Templates

Intro:
The argument claims that ....(restate)
Stated in this way the argument:
a) manipulates facts and conveys a distorted view of the situation
b) reveals examples of leap of faith, poor reasoning and ill-defined terminology
c) fails to mention several key factors, on the basis of which it could be evaluated
The conclusion of the argument relies on assumptions for which there is no clear evidence. Hence, the argument is weak/unconvincing and has several flaws.

1st Para:
First, the argument readily assumes that......
This statement is a stretch....
For example,...
Clearly,...
The argument could have been much clearer if it explicitly stated that...

2nd Para:
Second, the argument claims that....
This is again a very weak and unsupported claim as the argument does not demonstrate any correlation between....and...
To illustrate,...
While,...
However,....indeed....
In fact, it is not at all clear...rather....
If the argument had provided evidence that.....then the argument would have been a lot more convincing.

3rd Para:
Finally,...
(pose some questions for the argument).....Without convincing answers to these questions, one is left with the impression that the claim is more of a wishful thinking rather than substantive evidence.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, the argument is flawed for the above-mentioned reasons and is therefore unconvincing. It could be considerably strengthened if the author clearly mentioned all the relevant facts....
In order to assess the merits of a certain situation/decision, it is essential to have full knowledge of all contributing factors. In this particular case....
Without this information, the argument remains unsubstantiated and open to debate.

4. Going from the templates to full-fledged essays

ESSAY QUESTION:
The following appeared in the editorial section of a national news magazine:[/b]

"The rating system for electronic games is similar to the movie rating system in that it provides consumers with a quick reference so that they can determine if the subject matter and contents are appropriate. This electronic game rating system is not working because it is self regulated and the fines for violating the rating system are nominal. As a result an independent body should oversee the game industry and companies that knowingly violate the rating system should be prohibited from releasing a game for two years."

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. Point out flaws in the argument's logic and analyze the argument's underlying assumptions. In addition, evaluate how supporting evidence is used and what evidence might counter the argument's conclusion. You may also discuss what additional evidence could be used to strengthen the argument or what changes would make the argument more logically sound.

Quote:
The argument claims that the electronic games rating system, although similar to the movie rating system, is not working because it is self regulated and violation fines are nominal, Hence, the gaming rating system should be overseen by an independent body. Stated in this way the argument fails to mention several key factors, on the basis of which it could be evaluated. The conclusion relies on assumptions, for which there is no clear evidence. Therefore, the argument is rather weak, unconvincing, and has several flaws.

First, the argument readily assumes that because the electronic game rating system is self regulated, it is not working well. This statement is a stretch and not substantiated in any way. There are numerous examples in other areas of business or commerce, where the entities are self regulated and rather successful. For instance, FIA, the Formula1 racing organization is self regulated. Yet, the sport is very popular and successful, drawing millions of spectators around the world each year. Tickets are rather expensive, races are shown on pay-per-view, and nearly all drivers are paid very well. Another example is the paralleled movie rating system that the argument mentions. The author fails to clarify whether it is working well, but it is clear that the movie rating system is pretty well received by people, who often base their decisions to go see a movie with kids or not on the movie rating. It has never been a case when someone would feel cheated by the movie rating and express disappointment afterwards. Since the movie rating system is also self regulated, it follows that this regulatory method is working pretty well and it is not obvious how it can be the reason for the poor electronic game rating system. The argument would have been much clearer if it explicitly gave examples of how the self regulatory system led to bad ratings and customer dissatisfaction.

Second, the argument claims that any violation fees for bad electronic game ratings are nominal. It thus suggests that this is yet another reason for the rating system not working. This is again a very weak and unsupported claim as the argument does not demonstrate any correlation between the monetary amount of the fines and the quality of the electronic game rating system. In fact, the argument does not even draw a parallel with the mentioned movie rating system and its violation fines. If any such correlation had been shown for the movie rating system, which supposedly works well, then the author would have sounded a bit more convincing. In addition, if the argument provided evidence that low violation fines lead to electronic game manufacturers to ignore any regulations with respect to the game rating system, the argument could have been strengthened even further.

Finally, the argument concludes that an independent body should oversee the game industry and companies that violate the rating system, should be punished. From this statement again, it is not at all clear how an independent regulatory body can do a better job than a self regulated one. Without supporting evidence and examples from other businesses where independent regulatory bodies have done a great job, one is left with the impression that the claim is more of a wishful thinking rather than substantive evidence. As a result, this conclusion has no legs to stand on.

In summary, the argument is flawed and therefore unconvincing. It could be considerably strengthened if the author clearly mentioned all the relevant facts. In order to assess the merits of a certain situation, it is essential to have full knowledge of all contributing factors.

5. Final tips

• During the tutorial type in a few sentences in the mock essay window to get used to the keyboard.
• Again during the tutorial, jot down on your notebook the basic structure of your essays or the opening sentences in case you get too nervous and forget them when the clock starts ticking.
• Write as much as you can. Try to write at least 500 words per essay.
• Always have the e-rater in mind as your potential reviewer. Remember that the human rater will make every effort to grade just like the e-rater. In that sense, keep your structure and volume in mind over actual quality/content.
• Be careful of spelling mistakes. Double check words that you normally know you misspell (e.g. exercise). Try to finish 2-3 minutes before time is up so you can slowly re-read your essay for the purposes of spell checking. Do not reorganize/delete sentences/paragraphs with less than 2 min left.
• No matter how great you thought your essays went, try to stay humble and focused - remember this was just a warm-up and the real stuff hasn't started yet!

Good luck!

_________________

Best AWA guide here: http://gmatclub.com/forum/how-to-get-6-0-awa-my-guide-64327.html

Last edited by carcass on 26 Aug 2014, 10:26, edited 9 times in total.
Manager
Joined: 22 May 2013
Posts: 53
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V36
GPA: 3.7
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 8 [1] , given: 22

Re: How to get 6.0 AWA....my guide [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Aug 2013, 07:34
1
KUDOS
This thread is like golddust esp for non-natives..thanks a ton chineseburned!!!!
Intern
Joined: 23 Dec 2011
Posts: 39
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GPA: 3.83
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [1] , given: 26

Re: How to get 6.0 AWA....my guide [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jul 2014, 07:46
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
http://tips00.blogspot.in/2012/08/how-t ... -gmat.html

The argument that <restate argument> omits some very important considerations that are necessary to get a full 360-degree view of the described scenario. The argument does not provide substantive evidence to be able to prove or even support the main conclusion from the given premises.

First, the argument readily assumes that…

Second, the argument claims that…

Lastly, the argument fails to account for the fact that…

In summary, the argument is extremely flawed because of the above-mentioned reasons and hence comes across as weak and unconvincing to the reader. If the author had mentioned all the relevant facts that are essential to objectively assess the situation under consideration, the argument would have been much stronger. Without this information, the argument remains unsubstantiated and open to debate.

 Now that you’ve typed out your template, take 3-4 mins to read the question and JOT DOWN 3 loopholes. Write them down on your scratchpad, do not memorize.
 Fill in the <restate argument> part in the introduction.

The argument claims <restate argument> omits some very important considerations that are essential to get a full 360-degree view of the described scenario. The argument does not provide substantial evidence to be able to prove or even support the main conclusion from the given premises.

First, the argument readily assumes that…<The assumed cause-effect relationship>
There could be multiple reasons for...<The assumed blah blah...>. For example..... <for loophole 1> Another example..... <for loophole 2>. Hence, the argument fails to convince the reader that… <The assumed cause-effect relationship>

Second, the argument claims that… <Any secondary assumed cause-effect relationship>. <Discuss it again as loophole 3. Give example as well.> This is again a very weak and flimsy assertion as it does not portray any correlation between <cause> and <effect>

Lastly, the argument fails to account for…<negative effect of cause> Without backing evidences and examples from <any related area>, one is left with the impression that the claim is more of a wishful thinking rather than substantive evidence. As a consequence, this conclusion has no legs to stand on.

In a nutshell, the argument is extremely flawed because of the above-mentioned reasons and hence appear as fragile and questionable to the reader. If the author had come up with relevant facts necessary to objectively assess the situation under consideration, the argument would have been much credible. Without this information, the argument remains sceptical and open to debate.
Intern
Joined: 18 Mar 2014
Posts: 19
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
Schools: Yale '17
GMAT Date: 12-23-2014
GPA: 3.5
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 64 [1] , given: 91

Re: How to get 6.0 AWA....my guide [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Oct 2014, 06:26
1
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Here is Chineseburned AWA guide in pdf format.
Attachments

File comment: Chineseburned AWA guide pdf
Guide to Perfect 6.pdf [433.94 KiB]

_________________

If you don't go after what you want, you will never have it- Steve Jobs

Current Student
Joined: 06 Mar 2014
Posts: 277
Location: India
GMAT Date: 04-30-2015
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 73 [1] , given: 84

How to get 6.0 AWA....my guide [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Nov 2014, 07:53
1
KUDOS
chineseburned wrote:
Guide to Perfect 6.0 AWA GMAT Score

Related AWA Resources:

I took the GMAT twice and scored 6.0 each time. I did put a lot of time in it the first time....too much actually. Being a non-native speaker and having not written a damn essay (of any kind) in many many years, I was very scared of the AWA. So, I went through every guide that I could find and wrote nearly 25-30 essays. Even had a friend grade them for me.....Pathetic, huh?

Anyway, for my second time, I just looked over my templates I created and wrote one of each the day before test just to refresh my memory on faster typing without making too many typos......

So, here it is....Enjoy, and please do not blame me if the 6.0 percentile goes down to 80 soon

AWA GUIDE

by Chineseburned

1. General Structure

Intro - Restate argument, point out flaws or state intention to discuss them below
1st Para - First,...
3rd Para - Third/Finally,...
Conclusion - The argument is flawed/weak/unconvincing because of the above -mentioned...Ultimately, the argument can be strengthened if/by...

2. Structural Word (should be all over the essays)

1. Supporting examples - for example, to illustrate, for instance, because, specifically
2. Additional support - furthermore, in addition, similarly, just as, also, as a result, moreover
3. Importance - surely, truly, undoubtedly, clearly, in fact, most importantly
4. Contrast - on the contrary, yet, despite, rather, instead, however, although, while
5. Decide against - one cannot deny that, it could be argued that, granted, admittedly
6. Ying-yang - on the one hand/on the other hand
7. Concluding - therefore, in summary, consequently, hence, in conclusion, ultimately, in closing

3. Templates

Intro:
The argument claims that ....(restate)
Stated in this way the argument:
a) manipulates facts and conveys a distorted view of the situation
b) reveals examples of leap of faith, poor reasoning and ill-defined terminology
c) fails to mention several key factors, on the basis of which it could be evaluated
The conclusion of the argument relies on assumptions for which there is no clear evidence. Hence, the argument is weak/unconvincing and has several flaws.

1st Para:
First, the argument readily assumes that......
This statement is a stretch....
For example,...
Clearly,...
The argument could have been much clearer if it explicitly stated that...

2nd Para:
Second, the argument claims that....
This is again a very weak and unsupported claim as the argument does not demonstrate any correlation between....and...
To illustrate,...
While,...
However,....indeed....
In fact, it is not at all clear...rather....
If the argument had provided evidence that.....then the argument would have been a lot more convincing.

3rd Para:
Finally,...
(pose some questions for the argument).....Without convincing answers to these questions, one is left with the impression that the claim is more of a wishful thinking rather than substantive evidence.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, the argument is flawed for the above-mentioned reasons and is therefore unconvincing. It could be considerably strengthened if the author clearly mentioned all the relevant facts....
In order to assess the merits of a certain situation/decision, it is essential to have full knowledge of all contributing factors. In this particular case....
Without this information, the argument remains unsubstantiated and open to debate.

4. Going from the templates to full-fledged essays

ESSAY QUESTION:
The following appeared in the editorial section of a national news magazine:[/b]

"The rating system for electronic games is similar to the movie rating system in that it provides consumers with a quick reference so that they can determine if the subject matter and contents are appropriate. This electronic game rating system is not working because it is self regulated and the fines for violating the rating system are nominal. As a result an independent body should oversee the game industry and companies that knowingly violate the rating system should be prohibited from releasing a game for two years."

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. Point out flaws in the argument's logic and analyze the argument's underlying assumptions. In addition, evaluate how supporting evidence is used and what evidence might counter the argument's conclusion. You may also discuss what additional evidence could be used to strengthen the argument or what changes would make the argument more logically sound.

Quote:
The argument claims that the electronic games rating system, although similar to the movie rating system, is not working because it is self regulated and violation fines are nominal, Hence, the gaming rating system should be overseen by an independent body. Stated in this way the argument fails to mention several key factors, on the basis of which it could be evaluated. The conclusion relies on assumptions, for which there is no clear evidence. Therefore, the argument is rather weak, unconvincing, and has several flaws.

First, the argument readily assumes that because the electronic game rating system is self regulated, it is not working well. This statement is a stretch and not substantiated in any way. There are numerous examples in other areas of business or commerce, where the entities are self regulated and rather successful. For instance, FIA, the Formula1 racing organization is self regulated. Yet, the sport is very popular and successful, drawing millions of spectators around the world each year. Tickets are rather expensive, races are shown on pay-per-view, and nearly all drivers are paid very well. Another example is the paralleled movie rating system that the argument mentions. The author fails to clarify whether it is working well, but it is clear that the movie rating system is pretty well received by people, who often base their decisions to go see a movie with kids or not on the movie rating. It has never been a case when someone would feel cheated by the movie rating and express disappointment afterwards. Since the movie rating system is also self regulated, it follows that this regulatory method is working pretty well and it is not obvious how it can be the reason for the poor electronic game rating system. The argument would have been much clearer if it explicitly gave examples of how the self regulatory system led to bad ratings and customer dissatisfaction.

Second, the argument claims that any violation fees for bad electronic game ratings are nominal. It thus suggests that this is yet another reason for the rating system not working. This is again a very weak and unsupported claim as the argument does not demonstrate any correlation between the monetary amount of the fines and the quality of the electronic game rating system. In fact, the argument does not even draw a parallel with the mentioned movie rating system and its violation fines. If any such correlation had been shown for the movie rating system, which supposedly works well, then the author would have sounded a bit more convincing. In addition, if the argument provided evidence that low violation fines lead to electronic game manufacturers to ignore any regulations with respect to the game rating system, the argument could have been strengthened even further.

Finally, the argument concludes that an independent body should oversee the game industry and companies that violate the rating system, should be punished. From this statement again, it is not at all clear how an independent regulatory body can do a better job than a self regulated one. Without supporting evidence and examples from other businesses where independent regulatory bodies have done a great job, one is left with the impression that the claim is more of a wishful thinking rather than substantive evidence. As a result, this conclusion has no legs to stand on.

In summary, the argument is flawed and therefore unconvincing. It could be considerably strengthened if the author clearly mentioned all the relevant facts. In order to assess the merits of a certain situation, it is essential to have full knowledge of all contributing factors.

5. Final tips

• During the tutorial type in a few sentences in the mock essay window to get used to the keyboard.
• Again during the tutorial, jot down on your notebook the basic structure of your essays or the opening sentences in case you get too nervous and forget them when the clock starts ticking.
• Write as much as you can. Try to write at least 500 words per essay.
• Always have the e-rater in mind as your potential reviewer. Remember that the human rater will make every effort to grade just like the e-rater. In that sense, keep your structure and volume in mind over actual quality/content.
• Be careful of spelling mistakes. Double check words that you normally know you misspell (e.g. exercise). Try to finish 2-3 minutes before time is up so you can slowly re-read your essay for the purposes of spell checking. Do not reorganize/delete sentences/paragraphs with less than 2 min left.
• No matter how great you thought your essays went, try to stay humble and focused - remember this was just a warm-up and the real stuff hasn't started yet!

Good luck!

Great Job!

However, if i may, a small SC error that was kind of poking me, is mentioned below (highlighted above too)

"Therefore, the argument is rather weak, unconvincing, and has several flaws."

Parallelism error ( 'weak' 'convincing' not parallel with the phrase ' has several flaws' )

Nevermind

I would rather place the above template as an amazing art of work. ( No reverse causation for the last 4 words please )
Intern
Joined: 22 Feb 2014
Posts: 30
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [1] , given: 3

How to get 6.0 AWA....my guide [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Dec 2014, 15:34
1
KUDOS
Thanks so much for this. I scored a 6.0 on the AWA. I followed the template and totally ripped apart the argument.
Intern
Joined: 16 May 2011
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [1] , given: 1

How to get 6.0 AWA....my guide [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Jan 2015, 19:32
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Thank you so much chineseburned! I got a 6.0 on the essay! I followed your template but added the additional paragraph that Veritas recommended. For those studying for the exam, this is the breakdown of my essay on test day:

Introduction: Restated the argument and pointed out the flaws.

Para 2: The most serious and obvious flaw that I saw in the argument - CORRELATION DOES NOT EQUAL CAUSATION. (I agree with a previous post. If your argument doesn't have a correlation/causation flaw then don't force this issue)

Para 3: The 2nd obvious flaw - applying a general rule to the entire population.

Para 4: Other factors that the author did not take into account that could affect the result. (EX: Not just the company's expense will affect the bottom line....other factors includes competition, the sales team, marketing, social media, etc.)

Para 5: Stating the argument does have some merit...but the author needs to provide additional evidence to support this conclusion. This paragraph wasn't that long...maybe 3 sentences MAX.

Conclusion: My conclusion paragraph was only 2 sentences and I simply restated the intro but changed up the wording.

Some final thoughts:
-I wrote over 600 words. (Write until you are right!)
-I only had 3 minutes left for proof-reading, which wasn't enough time to go thru the entire essay (but apparently it didn't affect my grade).
-I heavily used COPY and PASTE on exam day. This definitely saved me some time. I didn't abbreviate any titles or phrases.
-I practiced writing at least 3 essays before game day. So don't spend too much time studying the essay. Just memorize the template and use your valuable time to study the verbal and quant.
-6.0 was 92% percentile
Intern
Joined: 14 Jun 2016
Posts: 6
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [1] , given: 3

Re: How to get 6.0 AWA....my guide [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jun 2016, 16:26
1
KUDOS
Best guide if you want to get 6 AWA score.
Thanks
Intern
Joined: 21 Jun 2016
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [1] , given: 0

How to get 6.0 AWA....my guide [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jul 2016, 15:00
1
KUDOS
manlog wrote:
*just hypothesizing*
Guys, don't you think that adcom could penalise for such "tricks" if they check out one's essay? Say a bunch of people applying to HBS; clearly, the majority took a look on this topic/forum. Then there is a high probability this applicants would follow the same template. So HBS would see a lot of similar essays, and that's not good IMO.

Good point! To me, the problem lies with the GMAT scoring system. There is no reason quality/content couldn't be scored in a fair manner; see APLAC's and AP Lit's 9 point scale as needed. From an ADCOM's/prospective student's perspective, it seems to be a student would be dumb to have known about a template that seemingly guarantees him or her a 6 and not use it. Thus, I don't think an ADCOM can see it in any other way than that the student was resourceful, which is probably good, but at worst I think they just call it a draw and it doesn't really help/hurt you. From my understanding, the main time they care about the AWA score is when they have questions about the authenticity of who wrote the application essays. If you write those genuinely, I doubt there will be any issue. Definitely a fair point to raise, though.

It is also probably worth noting that this template has been around for 8 years and there are no reports of it being an issue (to my knowledge).
Current Student
Joined: 09 Mar 2007
Posts: 192
Schools: Erb Institute: Ross | SNRE
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 341 [0], given: 1

Re: How to get 6.0 AWA....my guide [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jun 2008, 19:29
+1, if you can dig up more examples that would be greatly appreciated!
_________________

http://www.erb.umich.edu/
http://www.umsocialventure.com
http://gmatclub.com/forum/post558169.html#558169 - a compilation of b-school interview questions
http://gmatclub.com/forum/8-66345.html - my (detailed) gmat debrief

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Manager
Joined: 25 May 2008
Posts: 196
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Re: How to get 6.0 AWA....my guide [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2008, 22:31
Verry useful post. I hope that it will help me to improve my 4.5 score. You must be rewarded. Kudos
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 403
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

Re: How to get 6.0 AWA....my guide [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2008, 13:38

However, just wanted to note that 500 words is quite a bit! I think 450 words is still pretty good (enough to get a 6.0)
VP
Joined: 30 Jun 2008
Posts: 1043
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 567 [0], given: 1

Re: How to get 6.0 AWA....my guide [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2008, 09:48
Thank You chineseburned.. +1 (unfortunately the kudos feature is turned off for some reason)
_________________

"You have to find it. No one else can find it for you." - Bjorn Borg

Director
Joined: 18 Feb 2008
Posts: 798
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 119 [0], given: 25

Re: How to get 6.0 AWA....my guide [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Nov 2008, 13:31
wow, just wow
best guide!
Manager
Joined: 21 Dec 2008
Posts: 79
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

Re: How to get 6.0 AWA....my guide [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Jan 2009, 05:23
seems a wonderful AWA posting...i'll try it out
Intern
Joined: 18 Jun 2009
Posts: 21
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 1

Re: How to get 6.0 AWA....my guide [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jul 2009, 22:01
brilliant chineseburned..
helped a lot, i was actually scared of AWA, but ended up getting 5. this surely helped..
Intern
Joined: 28 Jul 2008
Posts: 14
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 5

Re: How to get 6.0 AWA....my guide [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2009, 20:19
Thanks very much~!
Manager
Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Posts: 158
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 11

Re: How to get 6.0 AWA....my guide [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2009, 21:24
Found my strategy for AWA, thanks.
Intern
Joined: 23 Jul 2009
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: How to get 6.0 AWA....my guide [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2009, 23:23
You mentioned to type at least 500 words per text. On the test it is shown the number of words or characters I typed or do I have to estimate that?
Intern
Joined: 13 Jul 2009
Posts: 21
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 3

Re: How to get 6.0 AWA....my guide [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2009, 11:11
How long after we write the GMAT do we receive the AWA mark?
Intern
Joined: 23 Jul 2009
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: How to get 6.0 AWA....my guide [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2009, 20:53
Can someone use the exact words of the example above, or a little modification must be made?
In other words, if 100 people put the same templates, is there some kind of constraint from GMAT to do this? Will the scores be low? Or at least If I create my own template, can I use it over and over the same if I retake the test? Will the later scores be low? How the raters see that?
Are my essays send to business schools? Or just the score?
Re: How to get 6.0 AWA....my guide   [#permalink] 31 Jul 2009, 20:53

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11  ...  21    Next  [ 409 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Aiming at 5.0 - 6.0. How do you find my awa? 0 20 Jul 2015, 07:25
How to move from 5.0 to 6.0 0 15 Sep 2014, 01:55
8 GMAT: How to score a 6.0 on your AWA. 6 27 Jun 2013, 06:22
4 Please Review my AWA.My first and non native.Thank you :) 6 31 Aug 2012, 22:54
HELP -- How can I get me essays reviewed and scored???? 0 02 May 2012, 12:41
Display posts from previous: Sort by