Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Sep 2014, 14:14

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

I am confused over these two questions, hence posting the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 341
Location: Washington DC
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 4

GMAT Tests User
I am confused over these two questions, hence posting the [#permalink] New post 11 May 2009, 20:37
I am confused over these two questions, hence posting the entire RC. Please answer with reasons so we can discuss..

Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the spell of the free market. Consequently, nothing seems good or normal that does not accord with the requirements of the free market. A price that is determined by the seller or, for that matter, established by anyone other than the aggregate of consumers seems pernicious. Accordingly, it requires a major act of will to think of price-fixing (the determination of prices by the seller) as both “normal” and having a valuable economic function. In fact, price-fixing is normal in all industrialized societies because the industrial system itself provides, as an effortless consequence of its own development, the price-fixing that it requires. Modern industrial planning requires and rewards great size. Hence, a comparatively small number of large firms will be competing for the same group of consumers. That each large firm will act with consideration of its own needs and thus avoid selling its products for more than its competitors charge is commonly recognized by advocates of free-market economic theories. But each large firm will also act with full consideration of the needs that it has in common with the other large firms competing for the same customers. Each large firm will thus avoid significant price-cutting, because price-cutting would be prejudicial to the common interest in a stable demand for products. Most economists do not see price-fixing when it occurs because they expect it to be brought about by a number of explicit agreements among large firms; it is not.
Moreover, those economists who argue that allowing the free market to operate without interference is the most efficient method of establishing prices have not considered the economies of non-socialist countries other than the United states. These economies employ intentional price-fixing, usually in an overt fashion. Formal price-fixing by cartel and informal price-fixing by agreements covering the members of an industry are commonplace. Were there something peculiarly efficient about the free market and inefficient about price-fixing, the countries that have avoided the first and used the second would have suffered drastically in their economic development. There is no indication that they have.
Socialist industry also works within a framework of controlled prices. In the early 1970’s, the Soviet Union began to give firms and industries some of the flexibility in adjusting prices that a more informal evolution has accorded the capitalist system. Economists in the United States have hailed the change as a return to the free market. But Soviet firms are no more subject to prices established by a free market over which they exercise little influence than are capitalist firms; rather, Soviet firms have been given the power to fix prices.


8. With which of the following statements regarding the behavior of large firms in industrialized societies would the author be most likely to agree?
(A) The directors of large firms will continue to anticipate the demand for products.
(B) The directors of large firms are less interested in achieving a predictable level of profit than in achieving a large profit.
(C) The directors of large firms will strive to reduce the costs of their products.
(D) Many directors of large firms believe that the government should establish the prices that will be charged for products.
(E) Many directors of large firms believe that the price charged for products is likely to increase annually.

9. In the passage, the author is primarily concerned with
(A) predicting the consequences of a practice
(B) criticizing a point of view
(C) calling attention to recent discoveries
(D) proposing a topic for research
(E) summarizing conflicting opinions
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 652
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 191 [0], given: 6

GMAT Tests User
Re: RC from 1000 RC [#permalink] New post 13 May 2009, 23:59
8. With which of the following statements regarding the behavior of large firms in industrialized societies would the author be most likely to agree?
(A) The directors of large firms will continue to anticipate the demand for products.
-this is the answer
(B) The directors of large firms are less interested in achieving a predictable level of profit than in achieving a large profit.
- this cannot be possible.
(C) The directors of large firms will strive to reduce the costs of their products.
- No because - "Each large firm will thus AVOID significant price-cutting, because price-cutting would be prejudicial to the common interest in a stable demand for products"
(D) Many directors of large firms believe that the government should establish the prices that will be charged for products.
- NO actually consumer does set prices
(E) Many directors of large firms believe that the price charged for products is likely to increase annually.
-- No intention is mentioned in passage

9. In the passage, the author is primarily concerned with
(A) predicting the consequences of a practice
- author is never analyzing consequences rather he is merely stating the FACT - what happens in US and in non-socialist countries
(B) criticizing a point of view
- answer
(C) calling attention to recent discoveries
(D) proposing a topic for research
(E) summarizing conflicting opinions

C,D and E are straight out. nothing is mentioned about discoveries, research or opinions.
_________________

If You're Not Living On The Edge, You're Taking Up Too Much Space

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1579
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 184 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: RC from 1000 RC [#permalink] New post 14 May 2009, 01:02
8-A, 9-B.
Re: RC from 1000 RC   [#permalink] 14 May 2009, 01:02
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Experts publish their posts in the topic I am confused between the following two sentences He crick20002002 4 06 Mar 2012, 18:52
1 I am confused about the usage of these two idioms. Say I had retro 4 03 May 2011, 21:22
I am posting this again as I see two different (OA) ashkrs 19 14 Aug 2007, 11:26
I am so confused....:( :) lhotseface 24 08 Mar 2007, 17:12
I AM CONFUSED blessingame 1 25 Oct 2005, 21:11
Display posts from previous: Sort by

I am confused over these two questions, hence posting the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.