I am not always sure how to check if a relative clause is : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC)
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 07 Dec 2016, 03:49

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# I am not always sure how to check if a relative clause is

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 12 Jan 2013
Posts: 58
Location: United States (NY)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V47
GPA: 3.89
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 13

I am not always sure how to check if a relative clause is [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2013, 21:19
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

I am not always sure how to check if a relative clause is essential (defining) or non-essential (non-defining).

Let's take this example from MGMAT's SC book, pages 93 and 97, 12th edition:
Well-informed people know that Bordeaux is a French region whose most famous export is the wine that bears its name.

I am interested in the underlined relative clause that modifies region. Is this clause essential or non-essential?

This clause can be considered non-essential because...
- because of the indefinite article "a" in "a French region". After all, the sentence could have said "the French region famous for its same=named wine".
- because even without this modifier it is still clear, which French region is meant.

This clause can be considered essential because...
- because there is no comma before whose. Do we need one?
- because if we remove the clause, the meaning of the sentence changes. Well-informed people know that Bordeaux is a French region. Now those people do not look that informed any more.
_________________

Sergey Orshanskiy, Ph.D.
I tutor in NYC: http://www.wyzant.com/Tutors/NY/New-York/7948121/#ref=1RKFOZ

If you have any questions
New!
Senior Manager
Status: Making every effort to create original content for you!!
Joined: 23 Dec 2010
Posts: 490
Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
Followers: 348

Kudos [?]: 1882 [0], given: 82

Re: Essential and non-essential relative clauses with "whose" [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2013, 07:43
SergeyOrshanskiy wrote:
I am not always sure how to check if a relative clause is essential (defining) or non-essential (non-defining).

Let's take this example from MGMAT's SC book, pages 93 and 97, 12th edition:
Well-informed people know that Bordeaux is a French region whose most famous export is the wine that bears its name.

I am interested in the underlined relative clause that modifies region. Is this clause essential or non-essential?

This clause can be considered non-essential because...
- because of the indefinite article "a" in "a French region". After all, the sentence could have said "the French region famous for its same=named wine".
- because even without this modifier it is still clear, which French region is meant.

This clause can be considered essential because...
- because there is no comma before whose. Do we need one?
- because if we remove the clause, the meaning of the sentence changes. Well-informed people know that Bordeaux is a French region. Now those people do not look that informed any more.

Hi Sergey,

The modifier could be essential as well as non-essential. You should use the one based on the meaning that you want to express. You can identify whether a relative clause is non-essential by the use of comma. In the example that you have used the relative clause would be considered an essential one as it does not contain comma.

For example.

The person, who is standing next to the white car, is my brother.

No emphasis is given to the fact that the person is standing next to a white car. Probably there is just one person, so, in this case we do not intend to differentiate the person. The sentence could be read as "The person is my brother", the relative clause is non-essential.

The person who is standing next to the white car is my brother.

In this case the author/ or the writer intends to express information about a particular person. Which person? The person standing next to the white car. Probably there may be other people around or many cars around. Emphasis is given to the person and his state (standing next to a white car.)

Hope that helps,

Vercules
_________________

Re: Essential and non-essential relative clauses with "whose"   [#permalink] 19 Feb 2013, 07:43
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
I am always confusing about when to use amount and when to 1 15 Jun 2012, 05:40
1 Correct usage of relative clauses using "When" 1 08 Jan 2011, 22:17
5 Participle Clause vs Relative Clause 12 06 Sep 2009, 14:55
I am sure many of you have come across the Brutal SCs word 0 26 Dec 2008, 12:19
Sentence Correction I am not sure which is a better option 7 15 Mar 2007, 21:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by